Thursday, May 28, 2015

The 'Drunkometer' and its descendants: Tools of public health

Drunk driving laws wouldn't be very effective if scientists hadn't figured out an efficient and effective way to measure drunkenness. A brief history.

The 'Drunkometer' and its descendants: Tools of public health

Demonstration of “Drunkometer,” a predecessor of the Breathalyzer, in  1950. (AP/Carl Nesensohn)
Demonstration of “Drunkometer,” a predecessor of the Breathalyzer, in 1950. (AP/Carl Nesensohn)

A law is only as good as the ability to enforce it. Drunk driving is major cause of disability and premature mortality in the U.S., with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimating that alcohol-impaired driving is responsible for about 10,000 deaths annually. For this reason, driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 or higher is illegal throughout the country, with laws and penalties varying from state to state. All states, for example, have laws requiring judges to mandate that some or all convicted drunk drivers install in their vehicles ignition interlocks, which analyze a driver's breath and disables the engine if alcohol is detected. Pennsylvania mandates them for repeat convictions; New Jersey does the same, and adds drivers with high blood alcohol content (0.15 and above).

These laws would be of little value, however—and ignition interlocks wouldn’t exist— if there wasn’t an efficient and effective way to measure drunkenness. Enter a brief history of the Breathalyzer—a tool of public health.

While the observation that people carry alcohol on their breath is probably as old as booze itself, the scientific study of how to detect intoxication in the U.S. appears to have developed out of necessity: how to enforce prohibition laws during the roaring 20s, when moonshine flowed and fast cars were cheap.

A 1927 paper by Emil Bogen, "The diagnosis of drunkenness—A quantitative study of acute alcoholic intoxication,” for example, described the emergent problem of drunk driving and proposed that physicians could use science to develop enforcement strategies. That same year, a brief piece in Popular Science (note the image, the dapper gentleman is looking suspiciously sloshed) described an invention by chemist W.D. McNally that purportedly could detect drunkenness using chemicals that would change color when the suspect breathed into a tube that passed air through them. As the article notes about the device’s utility, “police might test auto drivers suspected of drunken driving” or “doubtful wives might test their errant husbands before admitting them late in the evening.”

Stopping the nocturnal admission of errant husbands never grew into a significant area of research. In the labs of Indiana University, however, scientists Rolla Harger and Robert Borkenstein focused on developing a device that would help police enforce drunk driving laws. As Barron Lerner—professor of medicine at New York University’s Langone School of Medicine and author of One For the Road: Drunk Driving Since 1900 –described in an interview on public radio, the “Drunkometer” was invented by Harger and Borkenstein and first used New Year’s Eve 1938 on the roads of Indianapolis. The Drunkometer involved having the suspect inflate a balloon with air and then passing that air through a mixture of chemicals to estimate the amount of alcohol in the blood. The Drunkometer was portable and effective, and eventually was mass marketed by the Stephenson Corp. in Red Bank, N.J.

Borkenstein went on to develop the Breathalyzer (breath + analyzer), which was even more portable and more effective, in 1954.

Harger passed away in 1983, Borkenstein in 2002. The fruits of their efforts, however, continue to save lives today. For these reasons, the breathalyzer has made its way into Oxford’s Dictionary of Public Health.


Read more about The Public's Health.

About this blog

What is public health — and why does it matter?

Through prevention, education, and intervention, public health practitioners - epidemiologists, health policy experts, municipal workers, environmental health scientists - work to keep us healthy.

It’s not always easy. Michael Yudell, Jonathan Purtle, and other contributors tell you why.

Michael Yudell, PhD, MPH Associate Professor, Drexel University School of Public Health
Jonathan Purtle, DrPH, MSc Assistant Professor, Drexel University School of Public Health
Janet Golden, PhD Professor of history, Rutgers University-Camden
Latest Health Videos
Also on Philly.com:
letter icon Newsletter