Saturday, May 25, 2013
Saturday, May 25, 2013

Can football exist without concussions?

In the wake of the Eagles' injuries and a new report on the death of former Penn player Owen Thomas, local college football coaches share their thoughts on the risk of injury from hard hits.

24 comments

Can football exist without concussions?

POSTED: Thursday, September 16, 2010, 9:31 AM
Filed Under: Football | Penn | Riffs

There's been a lot of news this week about concussions in football, and in particular the impact brain injuries have had on football teams in our region.

By now, you've probably seen Mike Jensen and Bob Moran's report on the autopsy of former Penn football player Owen Thomas in Tuesday's Inquirer. There was also Eagles offensive tackle Winston Justice's terrific column about how NFL players hide injuries in yesterday's Daily News. 

When Thomas' autopsy was published, a number of people asked me for my opinion on the report. I wasn't sure what to say at the time, but Justice's viewpoint really got me thinking.

Not long after reading that column, I went to Franklin Field for the weekly local college football coaches' luncheon. I figured it would be a good way to bring more voices into the conversation. By the time I had left 33rd Street, I felt like I had learned enough to be able to write something.

So here's my view first, followed by the views of the coaches who were at yesterday's luncheon. I hope you'll share your thoughts in the comments at the end.

I've never played football in any kind of organized way. I've probably put on a football helmet once or twice as a Halloween costume, but as far back as I can remember I've never put on a set of shoulder pads. The most football I've ever played is pickup games of touch or flag football with friends.

Like you, though, I'm a fan of the sport. We all know how big a role football plays in society, from high school games on Fridays to college games on Saturdays and the NFL on Sundays and Mondays. When we aren't watching games, we're talking about them at the office or on Twitter or here on Philly.com.

So we all get plenty of exposure to the sport. And we know that if there is one fundamental principle of how football is played, it is this: you hit hard, and you get hit. When one play ends, you get right back up and get ready for the next one.

There is a certain glory in that mentality, especially among defensive players. Much of the time, quarterbacks and wide receivers get the biggest headlines. So do running backs, at least in cities whose NFL teams' coaches understand how to use them effectively.

(In case Andy Reid is wondering, I'm not naming anyone specific. I'm just saying.)

But we also lavish praise on defenses. We revel in big hits by safeties on wide receivers. We mimic the best sack celebrations performed by defensive linemen.

Every so often, though, we witness the kinds of events that we've seen this week. On Sunday, Eagles linebacker Stewart Bradley was hit, went down, got back up, and fell over again before the medical staff could attend to him. It was clear right away that Bradley had suffered a concussion.

Not long before Bradley's injury, quarterback Kevin Kolb was slammed to the Lincoln Financial Field turf, and also suffered a concussion. But both players, as well their coaches, were determined to get the duo back on to the field. So after a quick examination, Bradley and Kolb returned to the fray during the second quarter. Only at halftime were they officially removed from the game.

It apparently did not occur to anyone associated with the Eagles at the time that they may have violated NFL rules by allowing Bradley and Kolb to keep playing. While I will defer to my Philly.com colleague Sheil Kapadia on matters relating to NFL rules, allow me to stick my neck out there and make an assertion about what we saw:

The rules aren't always of paramount importance when there's a sporting event to win.

That statement doesn't apply to any specific person or organization, or even specific sport (and this time I mean it). It is more a reflection on the psychology of sport as a whole, though it seems at times to be especially prevalent in football. And it may well have serious consequences.

It is terrifying to think that the depression which led Owen Thomas to take his own life may have been caused in some form by hits taken and delivered while playing football. Even scarier is the possibility that countless football players whose names we'll never know might suffer the same fate.

As was noted in yesterday's Inquirer, Boston University researcher Robert Stern has concluded that more than 20 deceased NFL players, including former Eagles star Andre Waters, suffered from the same illiness as Thomas. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy may sound like a complicated phrase, but it has a simple cause: repeated blows to the head.

Now comes the real question: do we need to change the way football is played? There may not be an easy answer. If we are willing to live with the physical and psychological costs that the sport incurs, then we can go right ahead as things are. But if not, then society has a lot of thinking to do.

There were five coaches at yesterday's luncheon, and I asked them all for their views. Let's start with Penn coach Al Bagnoli, who's been right in the middle of this maelstrom.

"I think we've got to be careful about what we draw in terms of conclusions until we get a comprehensive look at everything, but obviously it's an issue with everybody from the NFL down," Bagnoli said. "They're leading the charge, and I think colleges, and high schools, and Pop Warner are trying to folow suit."

Villanova coach Andy Talley has seen plenty of big hits in his decades in charge on the Main Line. He told me that his team, like many others, doesn't hit in practice after the preseason. Talley and his assistants also make sure to drill their players on proper tackling form.

"We're always talking about having your face up," he said. "Most of the things happen when your head comes down."

Talley admitted, though, that "when those bodies are flying, it's pretty hard to keep your head out of there."

Delaware Valley coach Jim Clements oversees one of the top programs in Division III. Yet as with many other programs at that level, Clements has financial constraints when it comes to making sure his team has the safest equipment.

"I believe that helmets that are out there are state of the art," Clements said. "Does everyone have state of the art equipment? No, but it's just a part of the game and athletics in general. Obviously you've got to take every single step necessary to make sure that the safety of our players is first and foremost."

Ursinus coach Pete Gallagher got a $5,500 boost in his equipment budget this year to get new helmets.

"I think the biggest responsibility for anybody is to make sure that you've got the right head gear on your kids, and then teach them how to block and tackle," Gallagher said. "A lot of the concussions you see don't come from direct hits. A lot of the concussions you see come from [side hits to] the jaw area, and I think with the new headgear that's available, that's a big deal."

New Widener coach Isaac Collins played running back at another Division III school, the University of Rochester. He admitted that he suffered his fair share of concussions during his playing career.

"When I played, smelling salt was the cure for a concussion," Collins quipped.

Collins noted how rules about head-to-head hits have changed in recent years, in part because of increased public understanding of brain injuries. Now a player who forces a head-to-head collision can be ejected from a game. Collins said he hopes that will help change players' mentalities.

"I think our kids understand that it's a safety issue for them first, but it's also going to penalize your team," he said. "So the big hit, leading with your head, then jumping up and celebrating, could get you ejected or could get you injured."

Now I turn to you all, and ask for your views. Is there an inherent conflict between the nature of football and our dislike of injury? To put things even more bluntly, is it an expresssion of weakness of character in some form if a person is concerned about the damage done by phyiscal violence in football?

We can say that changes need to be made, or we can say that serious injuries are just a part of the sport's nature. Either way, there are significant consequences. Not just for the sport, but potentially for our society as a whole.

24 comments
Comments  (24)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:59 AM, 09/16/2010
    I love watching football. I also work in a brain and spinal cord injury clinic where I have seen some unfortunate cases of football injuries that have left the players in pretty bad shape. There of course is an inherent conflict between our desire to watch football played at its highest level with its full complement of bone crushing hits and the potential tragic sequela that may ensue. In my opinion it really is up to the players to calculate their own risk and make that decision for themselves. It's an issue where you don't want to take away another's man way of making a living by paternalistically telling that that you know better and that not playing is the way to go.
    flyersfan13
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:08 AM, 09/16/2010
    i have to go out drinking 3-4 nights per week trying to entertain potential clients. i make way way less than the lowest nfl'er and my prospects are worse than a cut practice squad guy ... ill trade places with anyone -- anyone want to trade spots with poor little ol me ?? boo hoo hoo
    daveH
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:22 AM, 09/16/2010
    Quarterbacks and kickers get to have a career and their mental faculties. But for the men on the line, on either side of the ball, it's basically one or the other. Those guys are gladiators; they win glory and wealth, but they sacrifice everything for it. And if you're a fan, you're supporting it and, in the end, you're responsible. People who denounced Michael Vick for torturing and murdering dogs were right, but if they're football fans, they're also hypocrites.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:35 AM, 09/16/2010
    Can cars exist without accidents?
    -not bob levy
    remyy
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:43 AM, 09/16/2010
    bob levy the golfer ??
    daveH
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:59 AM, 09/16/2010
    Still don't understand why the NFL doesn't invest in better helmets. Most people dont know that with motorcylce helmets, the preeminant product for head saftey, a helmet can only sustain 1 hit, then its ruined. Even simply dropping a motorcyle helmet from a few feet off the ground ruins it by reducing its protection by nearly 50%. The NFL should be working the motorcycle helmet manufactures to ensure better equipment and more protection for the players.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:18 PM, 09/16/2010
    Football "protective" gear is hard-shelled armor and I think it worsens the injury problem. Why can't helmets be made of a rubberlike substance that deforms on impact and dissipates the force of a hit?
    paolibulldog
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:21 PM, 09/16/2010
    Lefty Grove, what are you talking about? Ever hear of Troy Aikman? John Elway? How about more recent qb's. Ben Roethlisberger? Kevin Kolb? QB's get concussions all the time.
    carlosbeltran
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:25 PM, 09/16/2010
    SPL, You should do a story about whether it's possible for people with helmet-hair like yourself to get a concussion. Maybe the NFL should start mandating that players see your barber before games.
    19124
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:43 PM, 09/16/2010
    The current research shows that concussions are not necessary to cause brain damage. In fact, it is the repeated small blows to the head that lead to CTE. Anyone who has played the sport of football at a high level and is truly honest about this issue knows that those blows are inseparable from the sport, just like boxing. People who focus on the quality of the helmets are either unaware of the most current research or just burying their heads in the sand. Let's start telling people the truth -- you cannot play football without incurring significant risk of brain damage -- then let parents and players make an informed decision. As a former player who loves the game, it brings me no pleasure to reach this conclusion, but the facts are the facts and the NFL is deliberately OBSCURING the true facts with it's disingenuous focus on concussions and helmets.
    Dutchmen
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:39 PM, 09/16/2010
    I remember a few years ago, OT Bubba Franks of the 49ers wore a rubberized sheath over his helmet, it matched the color and logo of the helmet and it helped cushion the constant blows he was taking to the head. Steve Young would not put one on his helmet despite the fact it worked for Franks. So in Young's case, as for other players perhaps, there is a 'vanity' factor it the precautions are less than pretty.
    Joe_From_Vegas
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:54 PM, 09/16/2010
    No football stories from the guy who covers soccer please. This issue is too important. Write an article about how they're banning "headers" in the French Premier League or something, you Mary.
    dragoon6
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:50 PM, 09/16/2010
    Just a note: Winston Justice is an offensive tackle. Bradley's concussion occurred AFTER Kolb's hit. (Trainers were attending to Kolb when Bradley's hit happened.)
    rodnougat
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:52 PM, 09/16/2010
    Take away the helmets and then see how many players lead with their head down. As long as players 'think' the helmets are protecting them, these injuries will continue.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:32 PM, 09/16/2010
    Good point, carlosbeltran. I was wrong to say that quarterbacks don't get brain damage. I was focusing on how bad things are for the guys on the line. My point is that football is immoral. A lot of fans will denounce me as a wimp for not wanting to see people injure themselves. You have to make your own decisions, and decide for yourself what's right and what's wrong. But if you're in for a penny, you're in for a pound. Don't come back later with some BS about how you care about Ricky Waters or that young defenseman from Penn. That's football.


View comments: 1  |  2
About this blog
Soft Pretzel Logic is Philly.com's college sports blog, with a primary focus on the University of Pennsylvania. You'll also see coverage of the Big 5, other major college sports events in the region, and the annual Penn Relays track and field meet.

Reach Jonathan at jtannenwald@phillynews.com or 215-854-2330.

Jonathan Tannenwald Philly.com
Philly.com Sports Videos
Blog archives:
Past Archives: