FactCheck: Clinton's misleading email narrative
Hillary Clinton's campaign and the State Department have provided incomplete and misleading accounts of when and why the department requested copies of work-related emails that she maintained on a private server.
Marie Harf, a former department spokeswoman, was asked at a press briefing on March 3 if there was a connection between the department's request for Clinton's emails and the House Select Committee on Benghazi's request for documents related to the deadly Sept. 11, 2012, attacks in Libya. Harf said the department in October 2014 sent letters to Clinton and three other secretaries "as part of our records maintenance upgrading."
Harf noted the department's October letter preceded the committee's request in November. "So the letter actually went before we got the request from the select committee," she said.
Clinton and her campaign have stuck to that timeline and narrative. Clinton repeatedly has said she was "asked to help the State Department" with "their record-keeping." She stressed that it was "not just me" but four other secretaries of state who received the October letter asking for copies of work-related emails. She did so most recently on Sept. 20 during an appearance on CBS' "Face the Nation."
We now learn, however, from the Washington Post that the State Department in the summer of 2014 contacted Clinton's representatives to discuss her emails and her personal computer server, and that those conversations were prompted by the House committee on Benghazi and resulted in the letters that went out in October 2014.
State Department spokesman John Kirby essentially confirmed what unnamed sources told the New York Times in a story on March 5. (A day after that article appeared, Harf acknowledged the committee requests were "a factor," but did not go as far as Kirby did in his email to the Post.)
It makes sense that the State Department would have contacted Clinton's representatives in the summer of 2014, because the State Department has said that on Aug. 11, 2014, it gave the House Benghazi committee 15,000 pages of documents related to the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi that resulted in the deaths of four Americans. But those documents included only about eight emails from Clinton, according to the committee's interim report, and some of them showed Clinton "used a private email account to communicate about official government business."
The Des Moines Register asked Clinton about the Post story and the discrepancy between her account and the revised department version offered by Kirby. "I don't know that. I can't answer that," Clinton told the Register. "All I know is that they sent the same letter to everybody. That's my understanding."
We leave it to readers to decide the importance of this discrepancy.
The fact is, though, Clinton and her campaign — with the initial help of the State Department — provided an incomplete and misleading account when asked a fundamental question about the email controversy. Clinton described the request for her emails as a routine record-keeping request that was made to several former secretaries, just as she has inaccurately described her unusual email arrangement as common because previous "secretaries of state" did the "same thing." In fact only one, Colin Powell, used personal emails for government business, and he didn't have a personal server.
Below are some of the statements made by Clinton, her office and her campaign about when and why the State Department requested her emails, beginning with the press conference she held on March 10, when she first addressed the New York Times story that said she exclusively used a personal email account to conduct official government business.
Her office that day provided a Q&A on her emails that made no reference to the discussions about Clinton's emails in the summer of 2014 or the fact that those conversations were prompted by the House Benghazi committee.
After Clinton formally entered the race, her campaign posted a second, undated Q&A called "Updated: The Facts About Hillary Clinton's Emails" that repeated the question and answer about why the department asked for her emails. That Q&A also addressed why Clinton did not turn over her emails until December 2014 — 21 months after she left office in February 2013.
Likewise, Clinton told MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell that she turned over her emails to help the department "with their record-keeping," and mentioned that the October letter went out to "previous secretaries of state" but not what prompted the letter or the conversations that preceded it.
Most recently, there was Clinton's appearance on "Face the Nation" that we mentioned above.
FactCheck.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit "consumer advocate" for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics. Based in Philadelphia, FactCheck monitors the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews and news releases. Its goal is to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding. Find a list of FactCheck.org funders here.