PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
comments
4
options
 
Wednesday, February 3, 2010

One of the editors here gave me a hard time for not getting more agitated in my Oscars nominations story about some of the slights, snubs and outright omissions on the list of candidates for the 82nd Academy Awards.

As the guy who said Fantastic Mr. Fox was not only the best animated film of the year, but the best cussin’ any-kind-of-film of the year, one would think I’d be peeved that the only recognition Wes Anderson’s stop-motion gem managed to get from the Academy was nods for best animated feature and best original score. No best adapted screenplay nomination (from the Roald Dahl book), no best actor for George Clooney, nor actress for Meryl Streep (they had to be satisfied with their respective salutes for the lesser endeavors, Up In the Air and Julie & Julia, instead).

Well, what can I say? After months of championing this brilliant existential caper movie and its portrait of a marriage, its trenchant examination of our innate animal instincts - and not to mention its compelling use of tweed and corduroy – I’ve resigned myself to the fact that Fantastic Mr. Fox is not a mass appeal  thing. Maybe if Sandra Bullock had been in it, and the sport depicted was football and not whack-bat, Anderson’s ingenious and charming classic would have been recognized as THE INSIPRED WORK OF ARTISTRY IT IS!
(Deep breath.)
Other neglected films/performances/contributions in -- or not in -- the roster announced Tuesday, as far as I’m concerned:
Nothing but a costume kudo for Jane Campion’s exquisite Romantic poet romance, Bright Star (Abbie Cornish over Sandra Bullock, I say).
No props for Michael Stuhlbarg, who stars as the tormented 1960s college prof in the Coen Brothers’ best picture nominee, A Serious Man (not to be confused with Colin Firth, who was accorded an Oscar nomination for his role as a tormented 1960s college prof in A Single Man).
And In the Loop for best adapted screenplay? (Insert your colorful Armando Iannucci Britspeak expletive here.) What should have gotten that slot: Scott Cooper’s adaptation of the Thomas Cobb novel, Crazy Heart. Or, hey, have I mentioned Wes Anderson and co-writer Noah Baumbach’s brilliant reexamination of the Roald Dahl children’s book about a fox on the prowl for chickens and high-alcohol apple cider?
Posted by Steven Rea @ 11:46 AM  Permalink | 4 comments
Comments   
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:41 PM, 02/04/2010
    Crude: The Movie for best documentary. See it and you'll never buy Chevron products again.
    brio
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:37 PM, 02/05/2010
    I really enjoyed reading this. Oh, Oscars..'When a child was just a child' (me), it (I) revered them as having a sort of objective finality in the conclusion of a movie's goodness. A symbol for the most perfect recommendation. It was a child, and now as it grows older, it sees the oscars as an entertaining bit of inanity, but the best kind of inanity that there ever was - that is, the inanity which is absolutely transparent but remains celebrated and relevant. Why? Why doesn't the student see through the forest of those golden human-like trees and walk right past (in his mental avenues)? Because I lovne movies and I love talkin about movies. I'll wear the inane, transparent dress if it means that I can expose my taste, naked. If all art presupposes an expression of geist, or freedom, then might the reflective (<- right word? - "'objectively'; from the future") celebration of the best art presuppose a sort of self-aware analytical free mind. If we free ourselves through the arts (or any expression) then what are we doing when we judge the expression, when we celebrate it? Looking over our shoulder (which is the present), waving and applauding at our freedom, feeling the warmth of its radiance beaming on our waving hands and maybe wondering - as we turn our backs into another year, another decade - how long they will burn and perhaps whether even they burn at all should there not be any living creature to perceive its glory - Oh, oscars. Poor, Mr. Fox. Maybe if he could just dig a hole and sneak into Pricewaterhousecoopers and prank the names just for the heck of it - oh, I'm pleasure-writing again. Peace, Ian
    IanJW
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:08 AM, 02/17/2010
    I was surprised that Nicolas Cage did not get a best actor nomination for his role in Bad Lieutenant. While by no means a perfect film, I enjoyed it immensely, and thought that Cage delivered one of his best and most exuberantly eccentric performances in years. See it if you haven't!
    Alice215


4 comments
About Steven Rea
Steven Rea has been an Inquirer movie critic since 1992. He was born in London, raised in New York City, and has lived in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Iowa City, Iowa. His column, "On Movies," appears Sundays in Arts & Entertainment, his reviews appear in the Weekend section on Fridays, and his blog, On Movies Online, can be found here. He is a member of the National Society of Film Critics.

Steven Rea's previous blog posts can be found here. Read his most recent columns and reviews, here. He also curates the movie stars and bicycling photo blog, Rides A Bike.