Saturday, February 13, 2016

Big banks say: We'll replace Fannie Mae

But don't take away our taxpayer guarantees, a boss of Wells Fargo's giant mortgage business tells Congress

Big banks say: We'll replace Fannie Mae


The US Government should split up ailing housing-finance giants Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac and turn over their work to several lender-financed Mortgage Securities Insurance Companies set up by groups of banks - while still guaranteeing home-loan bonds, says Michael Heid, boss of Wells Fargo's giant home mortgage loan arm and a spokesman for the 30-bank Financial Services Roundtable, in testimony before the US House banking committee. More testimony here.

The housing industry needs "a government backstop" to keep money flowing, Heid said. But it should be privately-run: Four to eight "MSICs" - enough to compete, but not to confuse - would buy loans from lenders, and charge lenders fees to provide government insurance on mortgage bonds sold to investors to raise more cash for new loans.

There would still be a "federal guarantee" on those mortgage bonds. But "standing before the federal guarantee would be: the down payment on a mortgage made by the homebuyer; any private mortgage insurance (bought by the homebuyer); the shareholder's equity" in the MSIC; and the insurance reserve," all of which would have to go broke before taxpayers went on the hook, Heid told Congress.

"The system we propose would operate much like the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund does today," he added. Except, of course, that FDIC is a government agency, with its own staff of bank examiners who hold life-and-death power over errant lenders. Instead, Heid wants to set up a new "World Class Regulator" to oversee the privately-run MSICs, set tough loan and bond standards, refuse bad loans, and make sure MSICs don't speculate on their own securities, like Fannie and Freddie did, to taxpayers' loss.

MSICs would also set aside 0.0004 (four-one-hundredths of one percent) of the value of the mortgages they buy for very-low-income home and rental projects.

If the MSICs charge enough, but not too much, for mortgage-bond insurance, "the federal guarantee would be budget-neutral" to taxpayers, Heid concluded.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

PhillyDeals posts interviews, drafts and updates that Joseph N. DiStefano writes alongside his Sunday and Monday columns and ongoing articles about Philadelphia-area business.

DiStefano studied economics, history and a little engineering at Penn. He taught writing and research at St. Joe’s. He has written for the Inquirer since 1989, except when he left a few times to work at Bloomberg and elsewhere. He wrote the book Comcasted, and raised six kids with his wife, who is a saint.

Reach Joseph N. at, 215.854.5194, @PhillyJoeD. Read his blog posts at and his Inquirer columns at Bloomberg posts his items at NH BLG_PHILLYDEAL.

Reach Joseph N. at or 215 854 5194.

Joseph N. DiStefano
Also on
letter icon Newsletter