Whooping cough. The name is downright Victorian — like “cow pox,” “the grippe” and other old-fashioned afflictions that have been wiped out by modern vaccines. But this bacterial infection is making a dangerous comeback.
Last week, a fourth suburban Philadelphia school district confirmed an outbreak of whooping cough, also known as pertussis. As of Friday, there were eight confirmed cases in the Quakertown School District, two at Hillsdale Elementary School in the West Chester Area School District, two at Great Valley High School in Malvern, and one at Saucon Valley High School in Hellertown.
Pertussis “starts with mild cold symptoms like a runny nose and mild cough,” says Kristen Feemster, MD, MPH, MSHP, of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Then come episodes of rapid-fire coughing. “The episodes can be so severe that the lungs run out of air, resulting in a forced inhalation that sounds like a ‘whoop,’ " she says.
Whooping cough’s real danger is to babies younger than six months old who have not yet been fully vaccinated. (Infants should receive a vaccine against pertussis at 2, 4 and 6 months, according to the CDC.) “It is estimated that one-fourth of infants younger than 6 months old [with pertussis] develop complications like pneumonia or seizures and 1 percent of infants younger than 2 months old with pertussis may die,” Feemster says. “The Philadelphia Department of Health released a health alert in January indicating an increase in the number of reported pertussis cases, including one that resulted in an infant death.”
CHOP usually sees one to two cases a month, she says, but has diagnosed 14 in the last two months. And pertussis has been on the rise across Pennsylvania and the nation in recent years.
Why are older kids coming down with pertussis — and passing it around? It turns out that the whooping-cough vaccine isn’t 100 percent effective, and immunity wanes with time, Feemster says. That means older kids and adults who’ve been vaccinated can still pick it up. And passing this infection along couldn’t be easier. Pertussis is highly contagious. An unvaccinated person has a 90 percent chance of catching it from an infected family member and a 50 percent to 80 percent chance of picking it up if it’s going around at school or daycare. That’s why kids with pertussis and their families receive antibiotics to shut down transmission. And why new mothers and their immediate families are sometimes given pertussis vaccine booster shots to “cocoon” infants.
Now, there’s a better way to protect little babies. In late January, an advisory panel for the CDC recommended pregnant women get a pertussis vaccine booster shot after their 20th week of pregnancy. It’s a “two-fer,” protecting moms and passing antibodies along to their babies in the womb, for earlier protection in the first months of life.
What do you think? Is there whooping cough in your school? If you’re pregnant, will you get this important booster shot? Let us know what’s happening where you live.
Those of us who almost died as a result of being given the pertussis inoculation in the 60's and early 70's are none to eager to
A)have our kids inoculated & possibly kill them for a vaccine that is NOT 100% effective. or
B)try the new improved inoculation.
Many of us are simply not convinced there is no link between vaccines and autism and refuse to take the chance with the vaccine. Yes, we realize we are taking a chance with catching the disease, we each weigh our own odds.
I had whooping cough as an infant. Yes, it almost killed me. I got the disease from the vaccine. I've got scars from both the vaccine (4 prong injections, remember those?) and the disease, where my umbilical cord blew out & hemorrhaged from the force of the coughing. I for one, will not be running out to get a whooping cough booster shot anytime soon, and really, can you blame me?
Gypsy gypsy_jo
actually, we don't "each weigh our own odds." A decision not to vaccinate affects other people besides yourself tavril
Beam me up, Scotty. There is no intelligent life here. Philly Born
Tavril- should I have sacrificed my children's health and life to insure other children wont contract this disease? Please don't misunderstand, I do see and fully understand your argument, and yes, it makes sense, until you look into your newborns eyes and your heart makes the choice for you. I don't know that either of us are "right" in our stances, but it bears discussion.
-Gypsy gypsy_jo
Moderate risks associated with DTaP vaccine:
Seizure (about 1 child out of 14,000)
Non-stop crying, for 3 hours or more (up to about 1 child out of 1,000)
High fever, 105 degrees Fahrenheit or higher (about 1 child out of 16,000)
Fewer than 1 out a million cases will suffer from severe allergic reaction and these cases are so rare it is not clear whether the vaccine is the cause.
(above statistics from the CDC website)
Given the 25% risk of death in infants younger than 6 months and the infection rates stated in the article it seems very hard to justify not vaccinating young children.
blee357
The bottom line is there is evidence that this vaccine is dangerous, there is evidence that this vaccine isn't completely effective. Also statistically all diseases that there are vaccinations for were historically on the decline before the vaccine was introduced. Meaning that our immune systems work believe it or not ! Not to mention there are toxins and carcinogens in every vaccine. Plus it's a known fact that the only way the pharmaceutical companies can make a profit on vaccinations is by selling large amounts of the vaccines. Our elected officials pockets are lined with big pharma money, is it a coincidence that they attempt to make vaccinations a government mandate ? Superskunk
thank you, superskunk, well said, unfortunately, someone will jump on you as a conspiracy theorist...the politics of medicine. gypsy_jo
Diseases were statistically declining before vaccines due to an unfortunate process known as natural selection. Those with "better" immune systems were either not getting these diseases or surviving them long enough to pass the genetic advantage on to the next generation. Those with "worse" immune systems were not living long enough. To the intellectually challenged conspiracy theorists, the risks of dying from any of these diseases far outweighs any risks from the vaccines themselves. And, the supposed link to autism, has been debunked over and over and over. I thank god every day for stupid naive people because it makes me seem smarter than I actually am. 23- The stupid naive people are a mixed blessing, though, because they and their unvaccinated children serve as a breeding reservoir diseases.
Also, do you have a citation for your claim that "diseases were declining before vaccines"? It seems doubtful. Your claim that it's caused by natural selection makes no sense; natural selection has been at work all along, even back when (you claim) the rates were higher. {citation needed}
For those of you who shun a vaccine that is not 100% effective, that includes nearly every vaccine available.
Superskunk - I'm not sure what "evidence" you are referencing regarding the pertussis vaccine being dangerous, but before you spread misinformation, please cofirm that you are talking about the vaccine currently on the market and that you have scientifically reliable evidence. If you consider something having side effects (like those mentioned by blee357) as being "dangerous" then that would include any vaccine and any prescription medicine. This is why they are only available through a health care professional. BTW, if you had any knowledge of pharmaceutical companies at all, you would know that vaccines are not very profitable at all. Instead, those vaccines, which often are the childhood standard vaccines, continue to be manufactured and sold as a public health benefit. While I won't turn this into a discussion about big pharma, you should spend some time learning about how long it takes to develop one pharamaceutical product from compound to FDA-approved product and how much money must be invested by the company to get to that point, including all the money spent on developing, researching and conducting studies on the compounds that don't ultimately become an approved product. While I'm sure it would not change your mind about big pharma, it might give you a slightly different perspective on the importance of what they do. If you think private industry making a profit is a problem, then maybe you should advocate the government taking over the development of new medications--but I guarantee you that the government wouldn't (and wouldn't be able to) spend the kind of money on research and development that the current pharma companies do and you wouldn't have half of the live-saving/life-changing medications that you do today. Julie22
Yes, why bother with years of exhaustive scientific research, done by people with extensive schooling and vast knowledge of disease, when we can just 'have a discussion' in the comments section and decide how we all 'feel' about vaccinations. Michele Pasquarello
I smell a rat. Why doesn't this article talk about how people should be consuming all 90-some-odd vitamins, minerals and amino acids in order to attain/retain their health? What about the consumption of live enzymes? What about getting plenty of sleep? What about reducing stress? What about getting exercise? What about breast feeding? What about the avoidance toxins and/or detoxing the body? What about the avoidance of Cokes and Count Chocula? Why is it always about vaccines, vaccines and more vaccines?
Health does NOT come from the end of a needle Patrick Thomas
As a pediatric nurse I investigated the literature and found no credible evidence to support withholding vaccines to my children. Our immune system creates vaccines when exposed to antigens. Vaccines give a small amount of either a dead or weakened organism, or just an outside portion of it, to stimulate the production of antibodies. Statistically, the risks of injury from the disease is far greater than risk of the vaccine. Just like there could be an instance wearing a seat belt was more dangerous than wearing one, the overwhelming evidence is that in most cases you are safer with the seat belt. It's a risk-benefit decision but people are making the decision with incorrect or incomplete information.
Vaccines don't always work because a person may not create enough antibodies to defend against the disease. The more people in a population that are protected then the risk to those who do not have the antibodies is lessened. This is why it is important to get as many kids vaccinated as possible.
Please don't put your child, and your neighbor's children, at risk due to those who propagate conspiracy theories, anecdotes as fact, or just plain pure lies. brentrn







