Posted: Thursday, November 20, 2008, 7:08 AM | 20 comments |
 
options
 

In a game that could -- no, should -- have put the Sixers (5-6) above .500 for the first time this season, the Sixers defense looked weaker than the Eagles running game.

Last night, the Sixers lost 102-96 to one of the NBA's worst teams: The Minnesota Timberwolves (2-8). If you watched the game, or took a gander at the numbers, it's clear this game was lost on three fronts: The defensive end of the floor, free throw shooting, and outside shooting. The Sixers shot 47.1 percent from the floor, outrebounded the Timberwolves 40-33, and commited only 15 turnovers (we say 'only' because the Sixers recorded 27 turnovers in a loss at the Miami Heat two weeks ago). Decent numbers. Numbers that should have been good enough to beat a Minnesota team that earlier this season lost to the Oklahoma City Thunder. If you attended the Sixers most recent home game (against said Thunder), you'd realize what an accomplishment that is.

*But let's look at what the Timberwolves did. Or, rather, what the Sixers allowed them to do: 51.4 percent from the floor, and 25 killer points from forward Al Jefferson.

*And the outside shooting thing. This is tough because during some games this season, the Sixers have shot the ball very well from the 3-point line. But then they produce nights like last night (and like the opening-night 5 for 20 vs. the Toronto Raptors) that leave you shaking your head and wondering if the Sixers have the shooters to keep defenses honest on a nightly basis. Last night the Sixers were 1 for 11 from beyond the arc. Andre Iguodala was 1 for 6, with two of those misses coming in the final minutes of the game.

The Timberwolves made the Sixers' glaring absence of a consistent outside shooter apparant in the game's final minute when they pushed a one-point lead (95-94) to a four-point lead (98-94) by finding their shooter -- Mike Miller -- for a 3-pointer.

The Sixers went with their starting lineup -- Andre Miller, Andre Iguodala, Thaddeus Young, Elton Brand, Samuel Dalembert -- for much of the fourth quarter. And to be fair, this is the unit that brought the Sixers from a 10-point deficit, to down only one. But in the final possessions, the Sixers needed an outside shooter, and Iguodala tried to fill this role. After the game, I asked Cheeks if he considered getting a shooter on the floor -- i.e. Kareem Rush or Donyell Marshall -- at the end of the game. Cheeks response was that he went small for a few of the last possessions: subbing in Willie Green for Dalembert.

* The free throw thing. The Sixers were 15 for 23 (let me do the math for you ... or rather let me look at the stat sheet and copy the math already done: 65.2 percent) from the line. Andre Iguodala was a glaring 4 for 9, including a key miss late in the game that would have pulled the Sixers within one (instead it remained 94-92) with 1:30 left. Again, to be fair, Iguodala did a lot down the stretch. He tried to carry the team by slashing to the hoop, drawing fouls, and finishing a couple of tough drives.

Back to the defense, which was the Sixers main deficiency.

Once again, the Sixers struggled to stop the pick-and-roll. There were one or two possessions in the fourth quarter, when Cheeks had a lineup of Lou Williams, Willie Green, Kareem Rush, Reggie Evans, and Marreese Speights on the floor where they executed the defense of the pick and roll. Evans jumped out hard on the ball handler, forcing him to retreat. Williams and Evans then put an effective double team on the ball handler, giving him only one option: a harmless pass to the left -- nothing gained.

(When Cheeks subbed Elton Brand for Evans with 9 minutes, 42 seconds left in the game, Evans seemed to think that unit had a good thing going. He made a traveling motion with his hands as if telling Cheeks he should have let that unit get in a flow.)

But aside from those one or two possessions in the fourth quarter, with that second unit, the Sixers could not handle the pick-and-roll. And the Timberwolves are hardly Stockton and Malone. 

The guard's defender continually struggled to get over the screen, and the post defender jumped out half-heartedly on the ball handler, barely forcing him to slow down. This left the Sixers trailing a penetrating guard. On most occasions, the ball handler got into the paint before being forced to make a decision.

Here's what came out of the Sixers (tiny) visitor's locker room after the game.

"It's unfortunate we lost that game," said Cheeks. "I thought their bench did a great job tonight."

(Yes, Craig Smith -- who? -- came off the bench to score 21 points on 7 of 9 shooting.)

Elton Brand on Jefferson: "They find him in spots, and he scores." <-- a classic assessment if there ever was one.

"We have our ups and downs," Brand said of the Sixers. "We're learning a lot. We have a lead, but we have to step on the gas. We can't step off the gas."

(Brand was referring to the 11-point lead -- 21-10 -- the Sixers held for about three minutes in the first quarter. By the end of the quarter, the game was back to a one-point/three-point game.)

On the relatively easier stretch the Sixers are facing (Clippers, Warriors, Bobcats), and what this game could have meant to a productive stretch: "Yeah, it could have been. We wanted this game. We wanted to get this going."

Willie Green on the same topic: "Definitely, I think this was a key game. It would have put us over .500 and we had won three-straight. It's tough to let a game like this slip away."

Thad Young on the same topic: "At the beginning of the fourth quarter we were saying, 'Come on, let's go, we need this game.' We wanted to get above .500."

Instead the Sixers return to Philly 5-6, and leave everyone wondering which team the Sixers are: The one that won three games last week, or the one that couldn't beat a struggling Minnesota team.

--Kate

p.s. Yes, Dala, you were right about Jefferson.

Posted by Kate Fagan @ 7:08 AM  Permalink | 20 comments
20
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:07 AM, 11/20/2008
    kate: i could only follow the game via computer and saw a few "highlights". if the sixers aren't going to play agressive trapping defense on a regular basis, does it seem worthwhile to try a zone. clearly, zones have weaknesses but based on last year and this year to date, our defense is more swiss cheese. when a team as ineffective from the outside as we were, either don't keep taking these shots or insert marshall/rush. sure, iguodala did many good things but expecting him to make critical 3 pt shots is living far too dangerously. and how many layups did we miss...? hopefully the inconsistency will smooth out but there is a real need for some smart playing/coaching here.
    127sixer59
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:32 AM, 11/20/2008
    Mo has me in a fog of confusion. Is he really that lost as a coach? 1. Thad gets two easy post baskets being guarded by Mike Miller in the first quarter. Like taking candy from the baby. And then they never go back to the match-up- never as in not once. In fact they let Mike Miller guard a guy standing in the weak side corner all game (Thad's "role" in this offense), effectively letting the Wolves hide their weakest defender- while wasting the Sixer's most naturally gifted scorer at the same time! That's like the trifecta of poor coaching right there. 2. E-V-A-N-S. I can understand a few minutes to try to get the energy level up, but beyond that, Why? He cost the team so many TO's in the late 3rd and early 4th, it was painful to watch him out there. You can't send that rodeo clown out there for so many key minutes. 3. You let the Wolves kill you all day in the post, and then when you finally decide to send a double team you send the strong side defender to leave Mike Miller? Has Mo never heard of the concept of sending a double from the weak side? 4. I'm not convinced this team has been taught any strategy against the pic and roll. I realize that some of the players lack BB IQ, but seriously, this has been a problem for Mo's entire tenure. I will leave it at 4, I'm sure you can probably bring up a few more issues.
    tktk
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:13 AM, 11/20/2008
    127: I just don't think being in a zone can produce the transition offense that this team needs to survive. Your right, expecting Iguodala to make 3-pointers to keep you in a game is a recipe for disaster/losing. Like we have been saying (both of us) the growing pains are far from over. tktk: You bring up a great point about not going back to Thad after he scored six quick points early in the game. (You bring up other good points, but I'll leave it at that.)
    Kfagan
  • Comment removed.
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:05 PM, 11/20/2008
    To expand on the Thad point, does anyone else wonder why he is always the first guy to get pulled? It makes no sense to me at all, especially when he tends to be one of the guys who gets the offense going early. My suggestion - first sub in normal rotation circumstances is Speights for Dalembert. While I'm on the subject of rotations, under no circumstances should Dalembert and Evans be on the court at the same time. We had to make do with that last year because...well we had to. But there are better options now, and no reason why it should keep happening. Which leads me to my next point - how about some Donyell Marshall when we need three point shooting(If mo wants to go small, like he always does for some reason, Brand, Marshall, Thad and a your pick of lou, green, or rush is a good shooting lineup...) off the top of my head, i think he's been the most consistent in the couple games he has played. 127 talks about the trapping defense - its essential to what this team tries to do, and one of the reasons Reggie needs to get in the game (though if he's not going to do that when he is in, it sort of defeats the purpose). The key to sixers defense is disrupting the opposing offense in any way possible - and trapping is the way the way they had the most success when they were successful. Honestly, i feel like i'm not even watching the same team that made a playoff run last year sometimes. Oh yeah, agree with Kate, et al re igoudala at the end of the game - our go to shot cannot be an igoudala three. period.
    K,M
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:11 PM, 11/20/2008
    I think its time to get rid of Dalembert, he showed what he could do even against non-Dwight Howard type players, be abused defensively. Time to start the young kid Speights with Theo coming off of the bench.
    Jes44
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:52 PM, 11/20/2008
    Oh, and one more thing since i'm in a questionsome and ranting mood today...anyone else notice how the chat transcript posts appear in latin (shaded out in the background) before you click the icon? thats just wierd...
    K,M
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:26 PM, 11/20/2008
    KM, I think the idea behind pulling Thad in the 1st is that Cheeks wants to come back with him in the 2nd when Iguodala goes to the bench. Having them both off the court has not worked (though neither was effective in the 3rd quarter when both were on the court). Re: posting up Thad, I think we may see more of this as the season goes on, but I'm not sure he's ready to be the go-to guy in the 4th -- he doesn't pass well or dribble well, and post players face much more pressure in the 4th than the 1st. But with time, I'd rather see Thad in the post than Brand, who doesn't have any post moves except the "bull rush" and the jumper. AJefferson is an example of a *real* post player, great assortment of hooks, short jumpers, lay-ups off shot-fakes. I did think the Sixers made one positive move, switching Iguodala to small forward and Thad to shooting guard (based on their defensive assignments). There's no question that Iguodala's best moments this year have come as a small forward, and we all believe Thad's shot is good enough to play shooting guard. Thad did a decent job limiting Mike Miller's shots (except for the unfortunate switch at the end), though his rebounds were down (2 in 38 minutes?). Last note -- Kate, I saw you on the telecast (Minnesota's) -- sitting next to Phil Jasner at the scorer's table, right? Those were pretty good seats!
    Statman
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:43 PM, 11/20/2008
    Dalembert actually played pretty well last night. He only had 4 points, but never got the ball enough to get shots. However, he had 11 rebounds and 4 blocked shots in 34 minutes. He wasn't the problem. When he was out of the game was when Minnesota starting scoring more points in the paint. The last couple baskets by Jefferson could be blamed on poor rotation and help-defense just as easily. Speights is very athletic and can block a shot here or there but he isn't as good of a defensive player as Dalembert yet. He gets out of position a lot. Also, Dalembert controls the ball off blocked shots and starts breaks while Speights goes for the flashy blocked shot which goes out of bounds or gets recovered by the offense. The defense had the same problem they've had the last couple years with pick-and-rolls - they leave a good shooter wide open. I understand you want to be aggressive on defense and trap/double-team but the players on the court have to be smart about things and know not to leave a good shooter wide open. Lou Williams and Thaddeus Young are particularly bad about doing this. The offense is still too stagnant. It's basically give the ball to 1 guy and everyone else clear out and watch him get double-teamed. How about running some pick-and-pops to get Brand some open looks? How about running pick-and-rolls with Iggy and Brand to get Iggy some clear drives to the lane? How about someone cutting to the basket when Brand gets the ball for some easy lay-ups/dunks? Rush hasn't shown that he deserves more minutes. He hasn't played well when he's in there. I'd like to see Marshall get some time though. Our second unit is missing a SF. The line-up with Lou, Willie and Rush is too small. I still think it might not be a bad idea to move Willie back into the starting line-up, Iggy back to SF and bring Thad off the bench. Thad is the 4th option on the starting unit and he'd give us a really strong 2nd unit where he could be the focal point of the offense.
    JimG
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:06 PM, 11/20/2008
    I love how the team's "shooting guard" goes 4-9 on FT and 1-6 from behind the arc. Has anyone seen worse footwork on a shot than Iguodala's?
    bgcrimson29
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:07 PM, 11/20/2008
    I love how the team's "shooting guard" goes 4-9 on FT and 1-6 from behind the arc. Has anyone seen worse footwork on a shot than Iguodala's?
    bgcrimson29
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:40 PM, 11/20/2008
    I have a simple question.....why do you sign two shooters in the off-season if you have no intention of playing them? Iguodola: As I said in April, Iggy did not deserve that monster deal. They need a more prototypical SG - someone who can knock down shots. With the way he is playing now, we will not be able to get anything for him (especially since he is in the 1st year of a 6 year deal). This was Eddie's biggest mistake. He did a great job getting Brand and adding nice pieces, but Iggy is just not a good fit here. He also MUST play with his back to the basket. His one strength is that he is stronger and longer than most of the guys that guard him. He needs to back guys down - over and over - to draw double teams and open up shots and lanes for his teammates. I have been saying this for years. When he is on the perimeter, he is just kind of standing around waiting to run back on D. I WANT him on the block - not once a game - but 6 or 7 times. Does anyone remember how Jordan became so unstoppable in the later 90s? He would back people down and fade away or go up and under. This is where Iggy has to evolve. This is also where Mo has to get him the ball. I will not get into Mo right now.
    hugh
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:59 PM, 11/20/2008
    lots of good points and observations, especially k,m, statman and JimG. in some sense, perhaps the biggest consistent issue is the failure of playing good situational bb on both ends at critical junctures, which is magnified by some of the rotational moves. while the t-wolves are perhaps not quite as bad as their record, these are the types of games we should not be dropping with regularity. the refusal to have any coherent strategy seems to be working against creating the transitional flow we had last year. it's a work in progress but there are too many fundamental considertations that are undermining our development. while the younger players are still learning aspects of the game, youth is not an excuse with the number of experienced players here.
    127sixer59
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:59 PM, 11/20/2008
    Hugh, I agree with your your first comment: "Why do you sign two shooters in the off-season if you have no intention of playing them?" It seems a little illogical to sign for a need and then forget to actually fill that need come season. But as for your Iggy argument, I disagree, mainly because we've all generalized what our Sixers will look like 82 games in when we should be looking at them 11 games in. Iggy has time to adapt to the situation. We're not at a crossroads yet. We all forget too soon how hard it is for NBA players to connect with new teammates. It's not a 5 game science. It might take a half a season to get adjusted. Let Iggy figure himself people. I doubt Stefanski is shaking his head right now, asking himself if he made a mistake. It takes time.
    Comulles


View comments: 1  |  2
About John Mitchell
John Mitchell is in his first year covering the 76ers for the Inquirer after joining the paper in November 2011. He covered the Washington Wizards for the Washington Times from 1998 to 2008. He's also worked at the Philadelphia Tribune, the Wilmington News Journal, Courier-Post, Trenton Times and Elmira Star-Gazette.

Born and raised in West Philadelphia - not too far from Will Smith - he graduated from Overbrook High School the same year the 76ers won their last championship. He's a proud graduate of Howard University and the proud father of two sons, Jared and Jordan.

ABOUT MARC NARDUCCI

Marc Narducci has served in a variety of roles with the Inquirer since beginning in 1983. He has covered the 76ers as a backup and a beat writer. In addition, Narducci has covered everything from the Super Bowl to the World Series and a lot in between. Narducci also has a true passion for South Jersey scholastic sports, which he has covered for many years.

Follow on Twitter