Sunday, August 30, 2015

Questionable doctor's tortuous journey through legal system continues

A Tredyffrin Township man, who authorities said practiced medicine with a fraudulently obtained license, is presently jailed for illegally dispensing narcotics. But Richard A. Brown's legal woes, which date back to 2001, continue in Chester County Court - ever so slowly.

Questionable doctor's tortuous journey through legal system continues

Richard A. Brown (center) is led away in handcuffs and leg irons from District Court in Devon by deputy constable Patricia Kurdert (left) and PA narcotics agent Robert R. Semach in June 2008.
Richard A. Brown (center) is led away in handcuffs and leg irons from District Court in Devon by deputy constable Patricia Kurdert (left) and PA narcotics agent Robert R. Semach in June 2008.

Richard A. Brown, an embattled Chester County defendant, wants to be addressed as a doctor, he told a Chester County judge.

 That was among 21 issues he and his wife, Janice K. Brown, 53, argued today in pretrial motions -- and one of the few  that was uncontested. Against the advice of Judge Ronald C. Naglej, the couple is representing themselves on tax evasion charges.

 The prosecutors -- State Senior Deputy Attorney General Nancy S. Hartsough and Chester County Assistant District Attorney Christopher L. de Barrena-Sarobe -- said they did not object to calling Richard Brown a doctor. It is accurate that he had a valid medical license for a couple of decades before it was revoked; however, a grand jury concluded that Brown obtained it by fraud. The jury said Brown falsified documents from two of the three foreign medical schools he attended in the 1970s and forged evaluations. By the time authorities uncovered the deception, the statute of limitations had expired, precluding his prosecution on those charges, Nagle ruled. But prosecutors had plenty more.

In April, Brown, 67, of Tredyffrin Township, Chester County, was sentenced to eight to 16 years in state prison on 16 counts of illegally prescribing an assortment of antidepressants, painkillers, and speed. Detectives said he ran a narcotics mill from his home office a few blocks from the Strafford train station. A Chester County jury convicted him Feb. 2 - after a series of court challenges that took more than three years.

The investigation into Brown's medical practice spawned the tax charges. Prosecutors alleged that the Browns underreported their income  and illegally claimed a poverty credit for the tax years 2002 through 2005. The trial on those charges was scheduled for July 25, but today Janice Brown said the couple needs more time. She also urged the judge to release her husband from prison so that they don't have "limited access to one another," He refused.

Prosecutors objected strenuously to another delay, but the judge suggested that he was erring on the side of caution. "I do not want this case to be tried twice," Nagle said.

Then Janice Brown made the couple's surprise final request: "We will waive a jury trial." The prosecutors appeared stunned.

"We demand a jury trial," Hartsough countered.

The reason for their opposition? An hour earlier, the Browns had sought the judge's recusal, suggesting that his knowledge of the previous cases -- including Brown's probation for a 2001 conviction on similar narcotics charges -- might prejudice Nagle against them. Their sudden interest in having him become the sole arbiter appeared to be a setup for an appeal if the judge ended up issuing an unfavorable ruling.

De Barrena-Sarobe said the commonswealth would consider withdrawing its objection if the Browns were willing to sign a waiver barring them from addressing any appeal issues related to judicial bias. Nagle suggested the Browns discuss that option. The parties will reconvene July 25,  the date the trial won't be starting. Like many of the previous Brown proceedings, it has been continued.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Aubrey Whelan covers Chester County for the Inquirer. A native of a Philadelphia suburb so small it doesn't have a zip code, she grew up reading the Inquirer and was thrilled to take a job there in fall 2012. Previously, she covered crime, courts and D.C.'s Occupy movement for the Washington Examiner. Aubrey graduated from Penn State in 2011, where she worked for the award-winning campus newspaper and majored in journalism and French. Contact her at 215-495-5855 or You can also follow her on Twitter at

Aubrey Whelan
Also on
letter icon Newsletter