Saturday, February 13, 2016

Supreme Court to Decide on Strip-Search Limits

The U.S. Supreme Court will issue new rules on whether people arrested for non-violent crimes can be strip-searched

Supreme Court to Decide on Strip-Search Limits


The U.S. Supreme Court will issue new rules on whether people arrested for non-violent crimes can be strip-searched.  That could mean next month, or next June, at the latest.  The justices decide when, as well as what. 

At a one-hour hearing Wednesday morning, the justices grilled the lawyers in the controversial Albert W. Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington case.  It involves a Burlco man who was arrested during a motor vehicle stop 6 years ago after the trooper discovered he had an outstanding warrant for a contempt of court charge in Essex County.  The problem was Florence had already paid the fine two years earlier. 

 It didn't matter - the computer said he didn't.

Florence was jailed, strip-searched twice, and forgotten about for six days.  These are the undisputed facts.  Read the story here:

What hasn't been decided is who is to blame and whether they should pay damages.  Florence is suing in federal court, saying his rights were violated and he suffered emotional turmoil.  But first, the Supreme Court must settle the issue of whether it's appropriate for jail officers to strip-search everyone who is arrested and processed.

Florence and his wife, April, attended court Wednesday to hear the arguments.  When they descended the many stairs outside the hallowed hall, they seemed overwhelmed by what went on.  They didn't have an immediate comment.  There was a lot to digest.  The justices had asked lots of questions about whether traffic violators, teens who break curfew, and immigrants without documentation should all be strip-searched upon arrest.  And they wanted to know how searches should be conducted so as to make sure nothing is smuggled into prison and at the same time to allow an inmate some sense of dignity.    They asked not-so-shy questions about what is done now and what should be done.  When they decide, it will be the law of the land.   

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Written by Inquirer staff writer Jan Hefler, the Burlco Buzz blog covers breaking news in the the county, as well as its quirky characters, crime cases, politics, outdoor recreation and environment. Contact Jan at

Jan Hefler
Also on
letter icon Newsletter