Posted: Friday, June 12, 2009, 2:09 PM | 16 comments |
 
options
 

Go away for one lousy week and all hell breaks loose without Post Patterns to keep things orderly around here.

When the staff and I returned -- leaving out the lesser details about that nasty hound dog from U.S. Customs at Philly Int'l that had an issue with one small item in one small piece of luggage -- it seems that it was a busy week here.

In no particular order, we learned that: the Sixers got a shooting guard, the Flyers got a goaltender, Donovan McNabb was paid $6 million for being benched in that second half in Baltimore, Brad Lidge went on the disabled list, and the entire field of journalism (such as it is) was rendered asunder by John Gonzalez and some fantasy league geek in Peoria.

Not wanting to waste a minute before diving back into the fray, Post Patterns went to the Phillies game in Citi Field on Thursday and found the entire baseball press corps (such as they are) still in lather-and-repeat mode about Gonzo's Inquirer column in which he downplayed internet rumors of PED use by Raul Ibanez by writing a big story about it.

I like John, I like Ibanez, I like the baseball writers and I had a fine time in Peoria once when the Sixers played an exhibition game there because they thought Hersey Hawkins would be a big draw at his former college arena. (Harold Katz had a lot of ideas like that, but that's a story for another day.)

But everyone is very upset about the whole thing, except perhaps the fantasy league guy who ended up on "Outside The Lines," when he'd never even been outside of Iowa before. (It's entirely possible I have the guy's location wrong, by the way. I know he's from the midwest, though. But, hey, it's a blog post. I'm just kind of winging it here.)

Ibanez was the most upset, and understandably so, taking his word for the fact that his prodigious production this season has been the result of innate talent and hard work. Gonzo was upset, too, although he got some ESPN face time as well -- which must have done wonders for their ratings.

As for the core issue, no one knows for sure, of course, but we live in an innocent-until-proven society, Ibanez has never tested positive for any prohibited substance, and there is some history to what he is doing. That was laid out nicely in respected KC writer Joe Posnanski's blog, although Joe did admit that when Ibanez played for the Royals he and Ibanez used to exchange gifts for their children, so on the impartiality scale of 1-to-10, Joe probably isn't a 10.

The journalism issue is knottier. If something is "out there," buzzing around the internet, even if it is posted by someone with no professional standards binding him or her, with no actual reportorial knowledge of a situation and just kind of wondering out loud, is it fair game for the mainstream media to seize upon it as, well, information?

Unfortunately, the answer is: It depends. That's the fuzzy world in which we live at the moment and it should also be noted that the mainstream media -- where the streams are ebbing rapidly and drying up in spots -- isn't the bellweather of propriety it once was, either.

So, who to trust? Again: It depends. But we do live in a place where the distribution of ideas, opinions and information is not overtly controlled by the government. (The hound dog in the airport notwithstanding.) We make great fun of places that operate in that manner. Our system, despite its byproducts, is preferable. Raul Ibanez might not think so at the moment, but he works in a profession that has been tainted by his fellow professionals and comes along at a time when people are going to wonder the kind of stuff that the guy in Peoria wondered about. There are going to be things in blogs that are wrong and regrettable -- like the previous sentence, for instance, which ended in a preposition -- or this one, which is running on and on without any reasonable hope of a satisfactory termination. Whew.

 It's a new era, and some of the rules are still being figured out. (Preposition, again.) Twenty years ago there were no blogs. Now everyone has one. Murphy, the ball writer from the Daily News, yelled across the press box Thursday night, "Hey, I'm ripping your boy in my blog." I like Murphy, although he's not nearly as good a basketball player as he believes, and he has a right to criticize Gonzo in his blog. I'm in a glass house on that one since I took a little shot at Les Bowen a while back after he took a little shot at me. We got over it and have gone back to talking about Darden Smith and Joe Ely again, instead of what weasels we are. (I gotta stop that.)

Anyway, it's great to be back. Glad I didn't miss anything important.

Posted by Bob Ford @ 2:09 PM  Permalink | 16 comments
16
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:36 PM, 06/12/2009
    "Out", in the context in which you used it, is an adjective, not a preposition.
    chemlady
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:42 PM, 06/12/2009
    I can't get anything right today. You're correct, it's not a preposition, but I don't think it's an adjective. Some kind of compound verb with "figured." Pretty bad sentence, though, either way.
    Bob Ford
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:44 PM, 06/12/2009
    Ham sandwich in the carry-on. Guess it might have had foreign swine flu. Dog took it. What did you think I had in the bag?
    Bob Ford
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:48 PM, 06/12/2009
    Illinois not Iowa, Bob. Not that it matters.
    bdizzle
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:00 PM, 06/12/2009
    It's an adverb then modifying figured if I remember 10th grade English correctly.
    HandNik
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:08 PM, 06/12/2009
    "But, hey, it's a blog post. I'm just kind of winging it here." I applaud you, sir.
    MadAsHell
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:25 PM, 06/12/2009
    We live in a "guilty until proven innocent" world. Not the other way around. Richard Jewel, Duke LAX, etc.
    2Parm
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:26 PM, 06/12/2009
    Bob,the problem with the Ibanez story is that questionable or knotty journalism can become irresponsible journalism in a near instant. I point you to my early copy of today's New York Post where the Mets beat writer, Bart Hubbuch, penned this paragraph on P. 94 regarding last night's game: "Ibanez's clutch blast was his 21st homer of the season, adding fuel to the national controversy that flared this week when a blogger wondered if the 37-year-old's monstrous year was fueled by PEDs." The nypost.com article about the game does not include this paragraph, which leads me to believe that saner minds (and better copy editors) prevailed, but to have your byline attached to that trashy comment is a disgrace.
    fizzbin
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:37 PM, 06/12/2009
    That's awful. Clutch blast. Did he call it a round-tripper, too? And used "fuel" and "fueled" in the same sentence. Bleh. My guess is it had nothing to do with editing. Sane copy editors at the New York Post aren't clogging aisles. My guess is you saw a first-edition story that Bart banged out very quickly and it was a paragraph he didn't use in the late edition, which is the one the web site takes. Why? He had more Mets stuff to work with then. John Mayne going on the DL, quotes from the locker room, etc. As for the larger question, we are in agreement. Once something is reported upon, it becomes viral. I'm just not sure how to deal with it, other than a case-by-case basis. You can't say, "OK, no reporting on anything that is in a blog written by someone not employed by an accredited media outlet." That's not realistic. I don't have the answer, but would listen to suggestions.
    Bob Ford
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:03 PM, 06/12/2009
    The web is the mob. If I were Ibanez, I would say only that. He said a lot of the right things, but he still sounds as though he needs to defend himself. I'm just a schlep, but I can still find all manner of bad things about myself on the web, as can you. The web is the mob.
    Bake McBride
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:27 PM, 06/12/2009
    Hey Bob, that funny line about "innocent until proven society...." Most people that watched the OJ trials know better. Or, are you that old?
    TBear
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:56 PM, 06/12/2009
    This sort of thing is a much bigger deal in politics, and it was a really big deal in the last presidential election. While there were the usual “it’s been said that Obama is not really an American citizen” pieces, the Republicans really went a step further and turned the whole thing on its head when they started deriding the “vicious attacks” Democrats were making on Palin in the media, citing pieces that speculated whether or not she was the mother of her youngest child. Of course, these “vicious attacks” were mere blog posts, and who knows the true political affiliation of the posters. Since these supposed attacks only served to generate sympathy for Palin, it’s not far-fetched to believe that the bloggers in question were actually Republicans. We really don’t know because anyone can get a blog within 30 seconds and begin posting. That’s why I look to blogs for opinions, not facts, and I don’t think others’ opinions should really be cited in any serious news article. Then again, it’s pretty clear that Gonzo was hired to stir up controversy and generate traffic, and that’s exactly what he did. As far as I’m concerned, he was just doing his job. Of course, I think his job is rather pathetic, and it’s sad to see a former bastion of good journalism like The Philadelphia Inquirer stoop to this low level.
    MadAsHell
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:16 PM, 06/12/2009
    MAH, you're entitled to that one, and this is a good forum for expressing it. I also think there's a lot of wagging the dog going on in the blog world. As you said, the implications in real-world events, as opposed to relatively meaningless sports, are more far-reaching, but we have evidence of agents posting things anonymously in support of their clients and of sports organizations doing the same thing to influence, or try to, how they are viewed by the public. John, like the rest of us, puts his name on his work and has to be accountable for it. If he libeled Ibanez, which he did not, he would be on the hook for that. More than one can say about the bloggers. For the others, yes, I know that there is trial by media, trial by public opinion all the time. "Innocent until proven" is only the ideal, but it reigns where it matters. It rules in court and, in the case of a sports figure accused anonymously and circumstantially of using illicit drugs, it rules in the absence of a positive test.
    Bob Ford


View comments: 1  |  2
About Bob Ford
Bob Ford has been writing about Philadelphia sports since 1981, and is still trying to figure it all out. A former beat writer covering the Phillies and the 76ers, Ford became a general sports columnist for the Inquirer in 2003, following in and occasionally falling in the deep footsteps of Bill Lyon, Frank Dolson and many distinguished others. He comes to the Philly.com blogosphere after award-winning success as designer/editor of the fabulous Pen & Pencil Club softball blog. Likes: Palestra, inside-the-park home runs, sunny days. Dislikes: phony people, cloudy days, rewrites.
Follow on Twitter