Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Wednesday, July 2, 2008

The towering bronze statue pictured above stands guard over the entrance of the Reagan Library in Simi Valley -- it's called "After the Ride" and it depicts Ronald Reagan -- Midwesterner-turned-movie-star-turned-governor-turned-president - in the mythical guise of something he was not (except in a couple of "B" movies), a swashbuckling cowboy. Stetson hat in hand.

It's quite a tribute -- but almost every week now there is one like it somewhere in America, often in places that Reagan never set foot, like Covington, La. -- where just this week an even larger bronze statue of the Gipper was unveiled , some 9-feet tall, standing watch over a trail head in a town where neither the public or its elected officials had asked for it. Instead, the world's largest Reagan statue was placed there and paid for by the foundation of late oilman Patrick Taylor. The Louisiana entrepreneur started Taylor Energy in 1979, the year before Reagan was elected and two years before Reagan dramatically reduced taxes on big oil and began slashing tax rates for the wealthiest Americans. Today, Taylor's widow is said to be the richest person in the entire state, worth $1.6 billion; it's surprising the statue wasn't cast from solid gold.

But why wouldn't there be Reagan tributes from coast-to-coast, from New Hampshire's Mt. Reagan to the brand-new Reagan Medical Center at UCLA, a branch of the school that Reagan himself once decried as a hotbed of socialism and orgies? Haven't you been paying attention to the 2008 presidential race?

It was Reagan who not only single-handedly won the Cold War and toppled the Berlin Wall but also caused the greatest economic turnaround in American history, and that's not all. It was Reagan who looked Iran in the eye and caused them to give up our hostages in a matter of minutes, who taught us that "deficits don't matter" and was steadfast about never increasing taxes, who never compromised, who reduced federal spending and ended big government -- as so many political candidates have told us. He was the most popular president in modern American history -- and if only he were still in the White House today, he would have dealt sternly with illegal immigrants and appointed hard-line conservatives to the Supreme Court -- but we know he would never negotiate with terrorists, "cut and run" from a difficult military situation, or talk to our enemies.

As Reagan himself said (attempting to quote John Adams) in 1988, "facts are stubborn things." OK, actually when he said it, it came out initially as "facts are stupid things." The irony is that nearly 20 years after Reagan left office, neither is true -- facts are largely irrelevant, especially as we create these false idols of our 40th president. There is a Ronald Reagan myth in this country, and it is already causing great harm to our politics, and will do even more damage if we don't tackle it head-on.

The image of Reagan was all but hijacked by an ultra-conservative wing of the Republican Party in the late 1990s when its movement was at low ebb, lacking in new ideas and charismatic candidates. Amazingly, they've managed to whitewash both what was horrible about Reagan's record (the growing gap between rich and poor, the Constitutional abuses of Iran-contra, and ignoring of homelessness and AIDS) and a few things that were actually pretty good (his willingness to talk with the Soviets and other enemies, reluctance to use force that would cause civilian collateral damage, which he called "terrorism itself," and pragmatism on some other issues) to create a Reagan who never existed, who would continue to cut taxes no matter how large the debt and who believed not just in a strong military but in throwing its weight around.

Reagan's distorted legacy will loom over our next president, whether it's John McCain, who flip-flopped on taxes to appease key GOP power broker Grover Norquist, the head of the Reagan Legacy project, or Barack Obama, who has cited Reagan's political optimism as an influence and whose recent moves to the political right is raising new doubt about whether he can alter the course that was set nearly three decades ago.

Unless something is done to correct the myth.

I'd be ignoring the stubborn facts if I didn't acknowledge that there are a lot of books about Reagan -- but none have truly tackled what has happened in the years since he vanished from public life and his 2004 death, his distorted legacy and its warping impact on our political debate. That's why I'm more excited about the project that I am currently working on than anything I've done before: A full-length, hardcover book about the Reagan legacy that will be published in the early part of next year by Free Press, which is an imprint of Simon & Schuster. There's already a working title and a cover and a proposed release date, but for several reasons I'm going to continue to keep those under wraps for now. As the market for progressive volumes grows, I'm hoping to be able to take both this book and the underlying issue to a broad audience with the help of Free Press, my friends in the blogging community, and -- as they say on public TV -- people like you.

And yes, there's a practical reason I'm telling you this now. Although the project is surprisingly far along, I'm going to be taking my 2008 time off between the July 4 holiday and sometime in mid-August to finish the writing. That means that Attytood will be on something of a summer hiatus -- my tentative plan is to put up daily open threads so you guys can keep talking to each other, but probably nothing else (unless if there's more news related to the book). I'll be back full-time for both conventions and the excitement, hopefully, of the fall campaign, and the election of our 44th president.

Who won't be Ronald Reagan -- no matter what he tells you.

Posted by Will Bunch @ 1:15 AM  Permalink | 122 comments
Comments   
Posted 03:14 AM, 07/02/2008
yobill626
Will, you're not kidding when you claim the Reagan image was "hijacked" by the ultra-conservatives...Reagan effectively spoke to the Middle from the Right (just as Clinton & Kennedy effectively spoke to the Middle from the Left). Reagan has been deified by these blowhards as an almost unyeilding force of pure Conservative ideals, when his strength came from his abiltiy to combine focus with adaptability.
Posted 07:56 AM, 07/02/2008
didderbops
Sounds like a great project Will, kudos to you and I look forward to reading it. You should include with every purchase a DVD of "Bedtime for Bonzo" as well as an Ipod download of the Ramones "Bonzo goes to Bitzburg". The cult of personality surrounding Reagan borders on the insane. I remember thinking when his term was over that we couldn't have another president this bad in my lifetime; little did I suspect.
Posted 08:04 AM, 07/02/2008
jmc
We conservatives have gone too far with all this Ronald Reagan mythmaking. We need to start telling it like it is about our ideological icons just like the liberals do with JFK and RFK.
Posted 08:14 AM, 07/02/2008
b.atkinson
Have to laugh at this one. The left wing loons attacked Reagan nonstop from the 60s right through his death. I still remember chuckling at their blind rage over the outpouring of love and affection shown for the man when he passed. Most Americans loved Reagan. The loons? All they could do was hate even more. So now, we've got an extremist left wing blogger who recently wrote that energy companies are more 'vile' than terrorists, rapists and child abusers who is finally going to set the record straight on Reagan. And he wrote that between penning breaking news stories on Alycia Lane and Larry Mendte. I'm sure this venture will be every bit as successful as your last book and your journalistic career in general. lol
Posted 08:17 AM, 07/02/2008
Dave Clemens
I don't give a darn about Reagan the Great Communicator or any of that hogwash. What I know is that the dissolution of our nation -- in terms of citizens feeling any responsibility for one another, as opposed to being concerned exclusively with themselves -- began and was nurtured under Ronald Reagan and has accelerated under successive Bushes. Ronald Reagan was a deeply harmful influence on our country, and this has become evident as his corrosive legacy of selfishness and greed eats ever deeper into our national fiber today. Of course wealthy oilmen sucking off the taxpayer teat would erect statues to a man like this -- but let's the rest of us keep in mind what he meant to the majority of us who aren't politically connected greedheads.
Posted 08:24 AM, 07/02/2008
takisha
When can we expect the "myth of camelot" to be written by Journalists ? when can we expect the "all black victim myth" to be written by rev wright..when can we expect the myth of "journalistic integrity" to be written.. we can we expect the "disaster of the american school system by unions" to be written?..when can we expect "the great flipper" Obamamessiah.. eg ..faith based $$.. FISA.. will meet with Iran with NO pre ..hate NAFTA now luv NAFTA..HATE GUNS NOW LUV SUP CT DECISION...out of Iraq in hrs now we stay for yrs..Hillary fool now she's the greatest..too many to consider
Posted 08:26 AM, 07/02/2008
didderbops
Second what Dave Clemens said!
Posted 08:29 AM, 07/02/2008
Talking point sleuth
Uh oh. The sycophants are going to be upset with you, Will.
Posted 08:29 AM, 07/02/2008
Talking point sleuth
Uh oh. The sycophants are going to be upset with you, Will.
Posted 08:32 AM, 07/02/2008
MiddleNameHussein
So how many really think the USA would have been better with another 4 years of Jimmah Jihad Carter and Walter Mondull instead of Ronald Reagan? Only the MoveOn.org/CodePink kooks like Will The Shill Bunch, Polman, and Satullo, who want to see the USA destroyed anyway.
Posted 08:34 AM, 07/02/2008
Blinq
Good for you, bro.
Posted 08:39 AM, 07/02/2008
didderbops
"I still remember chuckling at their blind rage over the outpouring of love and affection shown for the man when he passed." Gee b.at, didn't know you frequented left wing blogs. Because that is about the only place where you saw criticism of the love fest that was the media's coverage of Reagan's death. One thing the right wingers can't stand to hear is that Clinton had a higher approval rating when he left office than did Ronnie Raygun. Contrary to the mythmaking machine, Reagan was NOT that popular. The propaganda machine has been working overtime since he left office to tell us he was the greatest President ever. He has become to modern day Republicans what Stalin was to the Communists in the 1950's, his real record whitewashed as he is held up as a role model for an ideology. In Latin America he is looked upon as all that is bad with America, the strutting Gringo Cowboy who is all cojones and no brains.
Posted 09:01 AM, 07/02/2008
Xi Jah
When talking about Ronald Reagan, I have to be personal. We in Poland took him so personally. Why? Because we owe him our liberty. This can't be said often enough by people who lived under oppression for half a century, until communism fell in 1989.I distinguish between two kinds of politicians. There are those who view politics as a tactical game, a game in which they do not reveal any individuality, in which they lose their own face. There are, however, leaders for whom politics is a means of defending and furthering values. For them, it is a moral pursuit. They do so because the values they cherish are endangered. They're convinced that there are values worth living for, and even values worth dying for. Otherwise they would consider their life and work pointless. Only such politicians are great politicians and Ronald Reagan was one of them. ---Lech Walesa. --------------------------Typical sychophant.
Posted 09:07 AM, 07/02/2008
jerry frazer
Let's discuss the legacy of FDR honestly while we are at it. His policies probably extended the depression (including his tax policies) and it took WW11 to end it. We'll start with that. Let's also talk about the orginal intent of the income tax, max rates of 5%?! Hard to beleive. How is Ronald Reagan looked at in eastern Europe by the way? Maybe that doesn't matter as much.
Posted 09:12 AM, 07/02/2008
Jess Wundrun
I will say that life would have been better under 4 more years of Carter. First reason: energy independence. Had there been Carter and not Reagan, it is safe to assume we'd have had no need to make a 1 trillion dollar mistake in Iraq to put our boot on the neck of those oilfields. And the Soviet Union imploded on itself, it did not die because Reagan called it names.
About Will Bunch
Will's book: Learn about it here and purchase it here.

Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

E-mail Will by clicking here.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Thanks.

Blog Roll
Philly/National
 
Atrios
 
Kiko's House
 
Suburban Guerilla
 
Booman Tribune
 
All-Spin Zone
 
Philly (Dragonballyee)
 
Afro-Netizen
 
Rowhouse Logic
 
MyDD
 
Bad Attitudes
 
Billmon
 
iFlipFlop
 
CorrenteWire
 
upyernoz
 
Tattered Coat
 
Fables of the Reconstruction
 
Slacktivist
Philly
 
Citizen Mom
 
The Next Mayor
 
Philly Future
 
Philadelphia Will Do
 
Philebrity
 
Young Philly Politics
 
Phillyblog
 
Welcome to Phillyville
 
Phawker
 
A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
 
Keystone Blog
 
Philadelphia - America's Hometown
 
BlankBaby
 
Above Average Jane
 
Phillyist
 
Metroblogging Philadelphia
 
The Clog
Politics
 
Josh Marshall
 
Daily Kos
 
Juan Cole
 
Oliver Willis
 
Andy Borowitz
 
War and Piece
 
Wonkette
 
BuzzFlash
 
Raw Story
 
Cursor
 
Crooks and Liars
 
Swing State Project
 
Kevin Drum
 
Talk Left
 
AmericaBlog
 
Hullabaloo
 
Mad Kane
 
Think Progress
 
Jesus' General
 
The Carpetbagger Report
 
Majikthise
 
Echidne of the Snakes
 
David Sirota
 
Glenn Greenwald
 
TBogg
 
Fire Dog Lake
 
Taylor Marsh
 
Matthew Yglesias
 
Jon Swift
 
Drudge Report
Sports
 
Beer Leaguer
 
The 700 Level
 
Dick Polman
 
Balls, Sticks and Stuff
 
Shallow Center
 
Philling Station
 
Phillies Nation
 
A Citizen's Blog
 
The Good Phight
Media
 
Romenesko
 
Editor and Publisher
 
Pressthink
 
Buzzmachine
 
The Inksniffer
 
Media Bloodhound
 
Eat the Press
 
Mickey Kaus
 
Media (Huffington Post)
If you must
 
Blinq
 
The Corner
 
Instapundit
 
Andrew Sullivan
 
Free Republic
 
James Taranto
 
Blonde Sagacity
 
ScrappleFace
 
Blogorrhea