
John Yoo grew up in the Philadelphia area and presumably got a great education at the Episcopal Academy before he headed off to the Ivy League and finally the Justice Department, where he became the nation's leading advocate...for war crimes. It is Yoo who adopted the warped and unsupported view that one terrorist attack gives the U.S. president the uncontested powers of an emperor, and that the president can use those powers to command torture, unlawful rendition or torture, and generally destroy the reputation of a country founded not really that long ago as a beacon for liberty and civil rights.
I -- and many others -- believe that Yoo's actions in the White House should be investigated by Congress and the Justice Department. That may happen, but for now he is still taken seriously as a constitutional expert and give all kinds of platforms to defend his views, that there was some kind of justification for the ideas that led to gross violations of law that took place at Gitmo, Abu Ghraib and elsewhere. The latest example: An op-ed by Yoo in this Sunday's Inquirer.
In the bad timing department, Yoo's op-ed was published on the same day that the New York Times published an op-ed chronicling some of the unlawful activity that was unleashed under the signature of John Yoo. You can read the graphic depiction of some of the torture techniques -- and before you say anything, I think the initial victims here are murdering thungs who deserve to burn in hell for all eternity for their own illegal acts plotted and carried out on 9/11.
But the whole point of fighting terrorism is maintaining a civil society, a society that's so much better than that. There's no evidence that torture produced any actionable intelligence that could not have been gained through legal means -- but it did recuit new terrorists to their cause in Iraq and elsewhere and sullied America's image among those who once admired us. For who? For what?
As the author of the New York Times article, Mark Danner, wrote:
What we can say with certainty, in the wake of the Red Cross report, is that the United States tortured prisoners and that the Bush administration, including the president himself, explicitly and aggressively denied that fact. We can also say that the decision to torture, in a political war with militant Islam, harmed American interests by destroying the democratic and Constitutional reputation of the United States, undermining its liberal sympathizers in the Muslim world and helping materially in the recruitment of young Muslims to the extremist cause. By deciding to torture, we freely chose to embrace the caricature they had made of us. The consequences of this choice, legal, political and moral, now confront us. Time and elections are not enough to make them go away.
John Yoo has a right to free speech in this country. What that means is that he's allowed to walk down this street or stand up on a soapbox in Fairmount Park and spout his repulsive viewpoints -- and not get arrested. It doesn't mean that Yoo is entitled to powerful megaphones for those views, like the op-ed page of an American newspaper -- not if we're really serious about treating torture with the gravity it deserves. Yoo's megaphone should have been unplugged a long time.
- There's no blood in torture...... Torture has no blood. Mr. Smith
Comment removed.
And he lies... "Agree or not with its policies, the Bush administration succeeded in preventing another al-Qaeda attack, with any reduction in civil liberties far less than previous U.S. wars." What about that episode of terrorism by anthrax? For some reason, all of the Bush inner circle seem to have some kind of amnesia about that time period. Or... maybe they really do believe that the case has been "solved." Not! kmurphy
Can someone explain to me why, if someone is concerned about American security, they would advocate using torture despite the consensus among intelligence experts that using torture is ineffective and counterproductive? Talking point sleuth
FYI that John Yoo continues to be listed as a "Distinguished Scholar" over at the National Constitution Center (http://constitutioncenter.org/ncc_about_Distinguished_Scholars_Panel_.aspx). I noticed this a year ago and I'm surprised to see that his name is still there. Makes me wonder about the Constitution Center itself. MB6
...but convicted cop killers should be given free access to any media they want, including commencement addresses, right Will? Your hypocrisy here is nauseating. To date, John Yoo has been convicted of nothing. Publishing an op-ed piece in the Inquirer offers a different side to the debate, and opens him up to ridicule and scorn, if appropriate. Why would you, as a journalist, be so passionate about stifling someone's expressing of their opinion, just because you disagree with it??? IggleFan68
but convicted cop-killers should have all kinds of access to media -- op ed pieces, commencement speeches, etc... Your hypocrisy is nauseating. Doesn't it make you wonder what kind of journalist you are when you advocate limiting someone's ability to communicate just because you disagree with them?? Remember, Mr Yoo isn't even accused of anything... TPS's point is much more valid. IggleFan68
Since you're not a toady, Iggie, I will refrain from commenting on your double-post. Oh. Wait. Talking point sleuth- Will, I just took the time to write a comment, and was told it's being "reviewed for publication", which means I'll never see it. Could you find it and post it please. This site has become frustrating. Thanks. jmc
hahahaha TPS... Read JMC's post, and you will understand why there is a double post by me. IggleFan68- "when you advocate limiting someone's ability to communicate just because you disagree with them??" . . . . Very unbecoming a journalist, I agree.
"But the whole point of fighting terrorism is maintaining a civil society" Hmm, I thought the primary point of fighting terrorism is to prevent citizens from getting killed. Compared to WWII, what we have seen in the WOT is pretty small change regarding civilian casualties and trangressions on civil liberties (anyone recall mail censorship?) db_cooper
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
- Atrios
- Kiko's House
- Suburban Guerilla
- Booman Tribune
- All-Spin Zone
- Philly (Dragonballyee)
- Afro-Netizen
- Rowhouse Logic
- MyDD
- Bad Attitudes
- Billmon
- iFlipFlop
- CorrenteWire
- upyernoz
- Tattered Coat
- Fables of the Reconstruction
- Slacktivist
- Citizen Mom
- The Next Mayor
- Philly Future
- Philadelphia Will Do
- Philebrity
- Young Philly Politics
- Phillyblog
- Welcome to Phillyville
- Phawker
- A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
- Keystone Blog
- Philadelphia - America's Hometown
- BlankBaby
- Above Average Jane
- Phillyist
- Metroblogging Philadelphia
- The Clog
- Josh Marshall
- Daily Kos
- Juan Cole
- Oliver Willis
- Andy Borowitz
- War and Piece
- Wonkette
- BuzzFlash
- Raw Story
- Cursor
- Crooks and Liars
- Swing State Project
- Kevin Drum
- Talk Left
- AmericaBlog
- Hullabaloo
- Mad Kane
- Think Progress
- Jesus' General
- The Carpetbagger Report
- Majikthise
- Echidne of the Snakes
- David Sirota
- Glenn Greenwald
- TBogg
- Fire Dog Lake
- Taylor Marsh
- Matthew Yglesias
- Jon Swift
- Drudge Report
- Beer Leaguer
- The 700 Level
- Dick Polman
- Balls, Sticks and Stuff
- Shallow Center
- Philling Station
- Phillies Nation
- A Citizen's Blog
- The Good Phight
- Romenesko
- Editor and Publisher
- Pressthink
- Buzzmachine
- The Inksniffer
- Media Bloodhound
- Eat the Press
- Mickey Kaus
- Media (Huffington Post)
- Blinq
- The Corner
- Instapundit
- Andrew Sullivan
- Free Republic
- James Taranto
- Blonde Sagacity
- ScrappleFace
- Blogorrhea
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008















