Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Robert McNamara, 1916-2009 -- and America's tragic memory loss

News blogs, sports blogs, entertainment blogs, and more from Philly.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Philadelphia Daily News.

108 comments

Robert McNamara, 1916-2009 -- and America's tragic memory loss

POSTED: Monday, July 6, 2009, 10:18 AM

Robert McNamara died today at age 93. As Secretary of Defense for Presidents John F. Kennedy and more notably Lyndon Johnson in the mid-1960s, it was McNamara who oversaw America's tragic military buildup in Vietnam. That made McNamara -- right up until today's news -- a vivid anti-icon to those Baby Boomers who opposed the war -- and I think you can make the case that his death is that of the most historical significance of the slew of recent "celebrity" passings, no matter how many millions of people are gathering outside the Staples Center to remember the Gloved One.

Bob McNamara was not a great man. He was a man with great intelligence that didn't prevent him from executing a plan that led to the unnecessary slaughter -- for reasons that remain hard to fully comprehend -- of tens of thousands of Americans and many more Vietnamese. He spent next four decades trying to come to terms with the banality of evil, with the horror of what he and those around him had done, but even his unusually candid apologies never seemed to go far enough:

The secretary of defense was a key figure in decisions to escalate the war between 1961 and 1965, and he readily concedes that the assumptions upon which he and his colleagues acted were badly flawed. They approached Vietnam, he recalls, with "sparse knowledge, scant experience and simplistic assumptions." Victims of their own "innocence and confidence," they foolishly viewed communism as monolithic, knew nothing about Indochina, and were "simple?minded" regarding the historical relationship between China and Vietnam. They badly misjudged Ho Chi Minh's nationalism and consistently overestimated South Vietnam's ability to survive. Regarding the key decisions of 1965, he admits he should have anticipated that bombing North Vietnam would lead to requests for ground troops. He concedes there should have been a public debate on the July 1965 decision for war. Over and over he acknowledges that he should have examined the unexamined assumptions, asked the unasked questions, and explored the readily dismissed alternatives.

The life of Robert McNamara was a personal tragedy, but it was also an American tragedy, our tragedy -- because even after McNamara spelled out everything that went so horribly wrong in Vietnam, he lived long enough to see a new generation of the self-appointed "best and brightest" in Washington pay absolutely no mind to the lessons of our recent past.

In Iraq, as in Vietnam, our policy-makers knew nothing or cared little about the long history and convoluted ethnic and religious politics of Mesopotamia's Fertile Crescent. In Iraq, as in Vietnam, there was no plan for the proper military follow-up to a period of "shock and awe" bombing. In Iraq, as in Vietnam, we totally misjudged the "nationalism" of the people who lived there and how they would react to a long American occupation. And perhaps most importantly, In Iraq, as in Vietnam, there was no real "public debate" as we marched headlong and foolishly into the 2003 -- with way too many "unexamined assumptions," "unasked questions," and "readily dismissed alternatives."

I actually spoke, very briefly, on the phone with McNamara in early 2003 in an effort to interview him for the Daily News. Like a few other journalists in that critical hour, I was hoping some of his tragically acquired wisdom might infuse the tepid pre-war discussions, and like all other reporters in those pre-war months, he told me he was holding off on commenting (as noted in the link above, he had a lot to say in 2006 when it was too late). That was a damned shame -- even though I can't imagine it would have tipped the rigged scales.

Regardless of your religious or spiritual beliefs, it's hard not to imagine there wasn't some higher purpose to McNamara's longevity. You could argue that it was a cosmic punishment, of sorts, to live so many years with the searing memories of so many who died so horrifically because of his misguided decisions from the comforts of his big desk at the Pentagon. Or you argue that he was still here in the early 2000s as a kind of a warped prophet, a flesh-and-blood monument to the folly of militarism. If that is true, then the fact that America refused to pay any attention is Robert McNamara's greatest tragedy of all.

Will Bunch @ 10:18 AM  Permalink | 108 comments
108 comments
Comments  (108)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:16 PM, 07/06/2009
    Thank you, Comrade! But I can't really take credit. We at PNAC owe it all to the New Peal Harbor (some Republicans are now openly hoping for a third).
    Hamlet
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:29 PM, 07/06/2009
    The only similarity between the Wars in Vietnam and Iraq - is the obsessively poor pentagon and military leadership - that wouldn't admit mistakes and bad plans until it was mostly too late - oh and that Military Industrial Complex that likes War-for-Profits. And who "Won" in Iraq - Halliburton, Oil Companies, Defense Contractors, and those who manipulate Intelligence for a living - profits vs. 4300+ killed and 37,000+ injured. Was it worth it? NO.
    pal
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:30 PM, 07/06/2009
    Brayanc, that is indeed, despicable what that ONE person did at an anti-war rally (so many of our returning vets have to wade through such rallys to get home). That reminds me of the time that I was disgusted with the Democratic Party and so went to a Green Party meeting. My Green Phase was over in one night - I thought right wingers were whackos!
    Hamlet
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:31 PM, 07/06/2009
    Quote: "... he lived long enough to see a new generation of the self-appointed "best and brightest" in Washington pay absolutely no mind to the lessons of our recent past." I would hardly call Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, Fieth and anyone else associated with the Iraq war of convenience the best or bightest of anything.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:32 PM, 07/06/2009
    Sorry Byanc, that was a typo.
    Hamlet
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:32 PM, 07/06/2009
    Hamlet and Master Dreamz responses are a perfect examples of liberal delusion. Even when they are proven wrong, they come back and make up some excuse for saying what they originally said. Its like changing the question to suit an incorrect answer. They say we lost the war, then a few people argue that point, explaining in detail why the war has been won, then they come back and say that we actually lost (in their mind) because of some intangible, unmeasurable effects such as this made up concept of moral superiority. And, even though it would probably kill you to admit that Bush did something good, a functional, successful free society democracy in the heart of the middle east is a good thing.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:33 PM, 07/06/2009
    Bryanc...geez!
    Hamlet
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:35 PM, 07/06/2009
    "They say we lost the war" I did? Quote me.
    Hamlet
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:37 PM, 07/06/2009
    "Hamlet and Master Dreamz responses are a perfect examples of liberal delusion" More like perfect examples of your reading comprehension.
    Hamlet
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:40 PM, 07/06/2009
    Hamlet, while you didn't specifically say "we lost the war" you certainly implied it by saying this: "And would some pro-Iraq War person define "win" as applied to the senseless invasion of Iraq. What were the mission objectives? WMD? Forcing democracy at the through the barrel of a gun? Freedom for Iraqi women? Permanent military bases? Free oil for PNAC supporting oil companies?" And maybe my reading comprehension does stink because I really don't understand this one bit ""Hamlet and Master Dreamz responses are a perfect examples of liberal delusion" More like perfect examples of your reading comprehension." Are you saying that the responses that you posted are examples of how I cannot comprehend the text? Maybe that post is your example of how you cannot express your thoughts cleanly or even correctly.
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:01 PM, 07/06/2009
    The delusion is believing our losses (money and lives), pete, equal a win. We were not defeated in Iraq (having nuclear weapons pretty much ensures we will never be "defeate") but we lost -- in every sense of the word, we lost. The people that died, the money wasted, the moral high ground we once we sat -- all gone. Like I said, if you can look at that as a win, or victory, then good for you. I cant.
    Master Dreamz
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:04 PM, 07/06/2009
    “What were the mission objectives?” That’s pretty clear to me. Meeting objectives is one way to define “win”. That our military was able to excel under the conditions set up by the Bush Administration is a testament to their skill, bravery, and superior tactics. I applaud and salute them. Our top generals were questioning the reasons and conditions under which we they were to send Americans into harms way before it started (many “took” early retirement), but as usual, in the end they said “yes sir” and followed orders. Now, can you understand a simple question without extrapolating how deluded and evil I am? I think I know the answer, but I’ll give you a chance.
    Hamlet


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About this blog
Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Reach Will at bunchw@phillynews.com.

Will Bunch
Blog archives:
Past Archives:
Blog Roll