Roger's Amnesia?
Roger Ailes seems to have caught a case of amnesia or a serious projection complex, "kvetching" to Eliza Gray:
Roger’s Amnesia?
Ari Rabin-Havt
Roger Ailes seems to have caught a case of amnesia or a serious projection complex, “kvetching” to Eliza Gray:
“The president likes to divide people into groups,” he huffs into the phone. “He’s too busy getting the middle class to hate rich people, blacks to hate whites. He is busy trying to get everybody to hate each other.” With that off his chest, Ailes gets back on message. “We need to get along.”
That sounds a lot like a mob boss bemoaning a crime wave.
Roger Ailes spent his entire career in politics dividing people along those exact lines to win elections.
While working for Richard Nixon in 1968 and producing the “Man in the Arena” events, Ailes openly played with race. In front of Selling of the President author Joe McGuiness, Ailes mused about dog whistling to racist white voters:
“You know what I’d like?” Ailes told the reporter. “As long as we’ve got this extra spot open. A good, mean, Wallaceite cab driver. Wouldn’t that be great? Some guy to sit there and say, ‘Alwright mac, what about these n**gers.’”
Twenty years later, while working for George H.W. Bush, Ailes once again was at the center of an effort to inject race-based appeals into an election, remarking to a reporter: “The only question is whether we depict Willie Horton with a knife in his hand or without it.” Horton was a convicted murder who committed an armed robbery and rape while on a weekend leave as part of a furlough program in Massachusetts. Bush cited Horton in speeches around the country, but he was most remembered as part of an "independent expenditure" campaign targeting Michael Dukakis.
While the Fox News chief subsequently denied he had anything to do with the infamous ad, his deposition before the Federal Elections Commission once again shows the divisive nature of his politics:
Q: Did the Bush committee have any policy about not using Mr. Horton's photograph?
A: I have no knowledge of that. I personally rejected the use of Mr. Horton in the advertisement.
Q: How is that?
A: A young researcher brought me a picture of him sometime and I tore it up and threw it in the wastebasket and said we’re not going to do that.
Q And why is that?
A: I knew the issue would backlash because of the liberal media.
Q: And what was that about?
A: When Republicans see Willie Horton they see a criminal, and when Democrats see Willie Horton they see a black.
That same year Ailes produced the controversial Revolving Door ad, widely criticized for its racial overtones, which attacked Dukakis for the same weekend furlough program highlighted in the Willie Horton ad.
Working on Rudy Giuliani’s first mayoral campaign against David Dinkins, Ailes attempted to stir up racial resentment between New York’s African American and Jewish populations. Ira Silverman, Vice President of the American Jewish Committee criticized one of Ailes’ ads, telling Howard Kurtz that while it was “legitimate campaign tactic” it “preys upon the fears of the Jewish community.”
And Ailes’ tenure at Fox has brought more of the same. In 2008, Bill O’Reilly approvingly cited his boss’s previous work, claiming the controversy surround Barack Obama’s former pastor Reverend Jeremiah Write was Willie Horton “time a thousand.”
That was the beginning of an almost endless list of divisive racial controversies stoked by Fox – Shirley Sherrod, the New Black Panther Party, and Glenn Beck’s statement that Obama was a racist. Each of these was designed specifically to scare white voters away from the President.
So how does this now square with Ailes’s “We need to get along” reset? It makes sense only if you take heed of what he said while under oath in his FEC deposition, “I never say anything to the press I’m actually going to do.”
Aieles is absolutely correct in his assessment of Obama as a divider. BillMcG- You do realize Roger Ailes is probably the number 1 reason you lost the election. Right? You do realize that if you stopped listening only to Fox News that you would actually have a view of what your fellow Americans are interested in and value. Right? You do realize that the America that you believe in is long, long dead and gone but that's not a bad thing. America is a little browner, a lot younger, less interested in what's going on in your bedroom and much more willing to help each other than you are willing to admit. Until you stop watching Fox News or Roger Ailes drops dead, you are in a lot of trouble because you cannot listen to what the majority wants if you are listening to a small very focused minority.
jonline
Absolutely, Bill - Ari seems quite a bit narrow minded. Obama intentionally seeks to divide. Who cares what some news guy said once upon a time and what you think about it. Obama is the President, and at every turn he tries to demonize people who think differently than he does. Mirror- Really? The right wing is CONSTANTLY crying about the "liberal media" and now that this article is focused on the "conservative media", it's "who cares what some news guy says"?
You dimwits repeating the standard lines of haters. Please quote specific instances of the President's attemps to divide the nation. Tell us again who made it a cornerstone of their policy to make Barack Obama a one term President. (How did that work out?) I seem to recall a certain group of politicians who intended to obstruct anything he wanted simply for political gain... Tell us again who made careers out of divisiveness Getinline
The Republicans portrayed President as a "divider" after they refused to work with him during his first term and Mitch McConnell declared that their main focus was to make President Obama a 1 term president. After that, the President didn't just sit around and twiddle his thumbs. He refused to play their games of "do nothing."
The GOP has utterly failed and now President Obama has returned, this time with a new tone and has the majority of the American people behind him. Now it's time for the Republicans to wake up and get with it. Adapt or die off.
Mr. Ailes isn't helping their case when he repeats a message he used 40 years ago... daxtremesolja- how stupid and yet, how funny at the same time!
advantasux
This comment has been deleted. b,ill at,kins- Still haven't gotten over those election results, huh, bile atkins?
Gnash away, goober, gnash away. Methinks your teeth will be dust by the end of Obama's second term. wokmaster
Served as an adviser to Al(Jazeera) Gore & senior adviser to media matters...Nobody's buying what you're selling as evidenced by all the comments so far...So Ari, did you advise Oil Gore to sell CurrentTV? Dobie Gillis
According to Ari, because Fox News told us about the intimidating New Black Panther party standing at polling places & because they let us know about a racist, Shirley Sherrod, who purposely was prejudiced against a white farmer, we should call Fox News dividers? I'd rather be aware to the truth then have my head buried in the sand as Ari would apparently wish for all of us. Don't use the argument that Shirley Sherrod did that long ago & it's in the past because if you do, I'll tell you to read your own amnesia article up above. Dobie Gillis
how funny - and insulting - that this news site expects its readers (all of them) to buy the fact that an "opinion" piece such as this one was offered as nothing but an unbiased profile of one man from one side of the aisle, and that the same could and will be offered any day now about someone from the other point of view.
Yep, just like that, out-of-the-blue news reporting, in actuality a thinly veiled attempt to do nothing but excoriate Mr. Ailes, especially as it pertains to comparing so unfavorably to the man he dared to criticize, Mr. Obama (aka "Messiah").
The site - and its papers - tries to understand how every iteration of new ownership leaves it with less of a voice and much less of a following in Philadelphia with each passing year, never asking itself, "what if we attempted to appeal to ALL people in our fair city, right and left, religious and non-religious, conservative and liberal? Is there a CHANCE we'd gain more readership?"
Apparently too stupid and ignorant to dare to even ask that question, the owners are left with no answers as they prepare to shut down the site and its papers altogether in the not too distant future.
Otherwise, thanks for the unbiased viewpoint, Mr. Rain-Havt, and associated editors. advantasux- Translation of your comment: Waaaaaahhh!
daxtremesolja
Most of you are all dividers living in your own personal bubble. You keep friends who agree with you while dismissing any opposition. You think your always right and everyone else is wrong. The only joy you seem to receive is in being an anonymous toughy guy or gal. I feel sorry for you and any children you may have. You don't even realize how unhappy and unfulfilled you and the people around you are. 19147


