Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  

Business   

share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Delaware River dredging will commence

Deepening the Delaware River to 45 feet could begin as early as January or February, even as officials from New Jersey and Delaware threatened lawsuits yesterday to block the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from proceeding without approval from state environmental regulators.

"It's moving - the train's left the station," said U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter (D., Pa.), who led an effort by Pennsylvania's top elected leaders to persuade the corps to act immediately based on "federal supremacy" over navigable waterways.

Delaware denied a permit for the work in July, six years after the Army applied for it, but Assistant Army Secretary for Civil Works Jo-Ellen Darcy decided Friday to proceed anyway, concluding, as her predecessor John Woodley had in April, that state approval was not required.

Gov. Rendell hailed the decision as a boon for the economies of all three states and "a sound environmental decision as well." He noted that dozens of studies have found dredge spoils to be safe and pledged that if New Jersey and Delaware do not want any of the 16 million cubic yards of material, Pennsylvania will "take it all."

Specter said that 10 million cubic yards of the spoils would go to fill an abandoned mine in Hazleton. Other dredge material will be sent to Fort Mifflin, in Philadelphia.

No sooner had Rendell and Specter spoken at a news conference in Center City than New Jersey Gov. Corzine declared he was directing his attorney general to "prepare legal action to stop this irresponsible move." He said he was "extremely disappointed" with the corps' decision to "plow blindly ahead."

Corzine is locked in a tight race for reelection and faces the voters next Tuesday; the proposed dredging project has been controversial for years in South Jersey.

For Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, who is weighing that state's legal response, the issue represents an excruciating political challenge. State and national Democrats are urging the vice president's son to run next year to fill the remainder of his father's Senate term, and powerful constituencies - environmental groups and business lobbies - are lined up on opposite sides of the dredging issue in Delaware.

Beau Biden said in a statement that his office was consulting with Delaware environment officials and Gov. Jack Markell and "remains ready to take the necessary legal action to ensure that the Army Corps of Engineers applies for, and obtains, the required Delaware permits before it attempts to dredge the Delaware River."

Rendell and Specter have been pushing hard for the project for years. Specter, a close friend of Vice President Biden, switched to the Democratic Party to run for reelection in 2010, and the White House is backing him, hoping to keep the Pennsylvania Senate seat in party hands.

White House contacts did not hurt in getting the decision, Rendell and Specter said. It was not done as a favor to boost Specter's reelection, they added.

"I've had contact off and on since the Obama administration took office with people in the White Hosue on this issue," Rendell said.

"We always argued this on the economic development and the environmental merits," he said. "I think that's why we prevailed."

"We argued it on the merits, but to argue on the merits you have to have access," Specter said.

The push culminated in a meeting Wednesday in Specter's Capitol Hill office with Darcy. U.S. Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.) was also there, and Rendell participated by speakerphone. They argued forcefully that a failure to move forward with the deepening project would deal what one official called a "deadly" blow to Pennsylvania's economy.

Asked if he asked the vice president for help, Specter said, "All I will say is those were confidential communications."

John Estey, chairman of the Philadelphia Regional Port Authority, said ports in the region "are at a competitive disadvantage if we don't deepen the river. Every major shipping line I've sat with over the past 21/2 years asks: 'Are you going to deepen the river?' We are in a very competitive environment. If we don't deepen the river, these lines will not come to Philadelphia."

Rendell acknowledged "there will be lawsuits from some advocacy groups, but they are going to have a heavy burden to go forward and stop this project."

Delaware officials denied the corps' application in July.

Craig Schmauder, deputy general counsel to Darcy, said a contract for routine maintenance dredging was awarded Oct. 9 to maintain the river's current depth of 40 feet.

Under that contract, the corps has up to 60 days to exercise an option to begin the deepening work. A notice to proceed could come after Dec. 25, he said.

The first part of the river to be deepened is an 11-mile stretch in State of Delaware waters.

The Army Corps intends to reapply for a Delaware permit, but because that process could take nine to 12 months, the corps will begin without a permit, Schmauder said.

By the time the corps is ready to deepen the remainder of the main navigation channel in Delaware waters, the corps would hope to have secured a state permit, he said.

"We'll do the first phase without a permit. We intend to go forward unless we are somehow barred through litigation."

 


Contact staff writer Linda Loyd at 215-854-2831 or lloyd@phillynews.com.

 

Comments   
Posted 07:42 AM, 10/27/2009
rmw38
The key words in this article are " a deadly blow to PENNSYLVANIA'S economy." PA will get all the economics from a project that is opposed by Delaware anf funded by New Jersey taxpayers through Rendell'a slush fund the DRPA. A pox on all the PA politicians who have been involved. This resident of Southern New Jersey will spend his hard earned money East of the Delaware.
Posted 08:20 AM, 10/27/2009
concerns25
About time, the silth is getting thick in the marinas as well as the river. Dredge them too. How about using the DRPA for the trolley ($500 million) to redo Penns Landing and get rid of the tram posts. We need a better waterfront now!!!!!!!
Posted 08:36 AM, 10/27/2009
SilverCTS
It's about time. I can't believe NJ and DE are against this. Stupid.
Posted 09:51 AM, 10/27/2009
pj katauskas
Pure politics is Corzine's motivation, just as was his motivation to race almost fatally to the Imus apology meeting with the Rutgers womens' basketball team. Was a gubernatorial presence really needed there? And our port is already losing business because of the depth of the Delaware.
Posted 10:20 AM, 10/27/2009
rob76774
Obviously the biggest obstacle to this entire process is the politicians who need to stop grandstanding and begin this project for the "common good"! The river clearly needs to be deepened and open pits in Northeastern PA could use the CLEAN FILL, not to mention the economic advantages on both ends. Stop the bickering and begin!!!
Posted 10:54 AM, 10/27/2009
James
The law is clear, the states cannot stop the Federal Government from starting construction on something. Delaware stopped the permitting process by refusing to issue a permit for political reasons. The Riverkeeper Network will use distorted facts to convince a federal judge to stop the dredging. EVerything that has been examined has already been examined and concerns about pollution have already been answered with places to drop sludge found in an abandoned Pennsylvania coal mine and Fort Mifflin. Corzine is joining Delaware to help himself win a close election. New Jersey and Delaware do not care how longshoremen earn a living on their shores. THey want trade, but do not want to pay the price for getting trade by deepening the river another five feet. Pennsylvania has done more than the two states have done to ensure jobs and economic prosperity come to the region. The Delaware Riverkeeper network is more concerned with fishes than with human beings earning a living. They do not care if people live in homeless shelters, only that their pet agenda gets done. If Federal Judge stops the project, Congress can overrule the courts by permitting it to continue.
Posted 12:36 PM, 10/27/2009
Wm.
The sooner humankind over-populates the planet and trashes the environment the sooner we'll be beamed to heaven to join the angels. Amen.
Posted 04:11 PM, 10/27/2009
mcguirk2021
What came first, the humans or the fish? Hey James, if the fish die, there is less food for us fat humans to feast on.
Posted 08:54 PM, 10/27/2009
ir8
James, environmental impact studies review other things besides fish. Have you given any thought to the impact on water treatment plants that draw Delaware river water for drinking water. What affect will this have on the treatment process? Don't expect Ed Rendell to consider it or care for that matter. He has already given the natural gas drillers permission to use our rivers to extract gas from shale. Turns out this water when returned to the river contains pollutants that the water plants aren't equipped to treat. The state's solution is to transport it to other rivers so they can pollute them all. Fish have died but the drinking water is fouled as well. But that's ok because tax dollars are generated and people are employed. They can just buy their drinking water from Ohio. And if the Phila water is fouled the longshoreman can buy beer made outside of the city.
Posted 01:42 PM, 10/29/2009
CollingswoodResident
This a great project and will make the region stronger.
Posted 03:25 PM, 11/01/2009
the Delaware Riverkeeper
The Delaware deepening is a dangerous project that poses great risk for the communities of this region that care about and benefit from our Delaware River. Economically the claims that made for a deepened channel are demonstrably untrue. Governors Corzine and Markell are to be commended for standing firm against this project and the rights of their states to have to review and approve projects that may do harm. The deepening project poses harm to fish, shellfish, and wildlife that support multi-million dollar fisheries and ecotourism industries; it threatens drinking water with contamination; it will subject communities to piles of toxic spoils far higher than they had been promised; and it threatens to wash away wetlands that are not only important ecologically but that provide important storm protection to our region. The issue is not just who will take the toxic spoils -- it is much more than that -- but that being said the spoils are not going from the River to Pennsylvania and anyone who says or prints otherwise is perpetuating a demonstrable lie. The jobs Rendell claims are not related to the deepening project, they would be the result of a new port project that could happen with or without a deepened channel. The deepening is not going to result in more goods coming up the river, those planning the project freely admit that. Primarily it will reduce overhead costs for 6 oil facilities, one of which is now shut down, and none of whom have committed to take advantage of the project. Experts and agencies at the EPA, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, at academic institutions, as well as in NJ and DE have raised significant concerns. Why are those who support this project afraid of the answers? The Delaware Riverkeeper Network cares about the River that supports this entire region, which includes all of you.
11 comments
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
SEARCH CARS