Posted: Tuesday, July 28, 2009, 7:49 PM | 12 comments |
 
options
 

This afternoon, U.S. Soccer Federation president Sunil Gulati held a conference call with reporters in which he talked about the just-completed Gold Cup and the upcoming American bid to host the 2018 or 2022 World Cup.

I asked Gulati about Philadelphia’s chances of hosting World Cup games, and he said the city "obviously is a market we’re very interested in."

Responses to U.S. Soccer’s request for proposals to host games are due tomorrow. A total of 58 cities expressed interest in hosting games back in April, and this deadline will whittle that number down to between 30 and 40.

Gulati said he was not sure whether Philadelphia has submitted a bid proposal. The only city he mentioned specifically was Tampa, because that city’s representatives delivered their proposal in person to U.S. Soccer’s Chicago headquarters.

But it's pretty clear that Lincoln Financial Field is in the conversation. It meets every requirement you could think of for amenities - except one.

The playing surface.

I know I've written about this already, and I probably will again as the bid process continues. But as obstacles go, it's pretty significant.

The minimum required feild width to host a World Cup game is 70 yards. Lincoln Financial Field's surface is somewhere between 65 and 68 yards - I've seen it reported as both over the years. Regardless, we know it is not 70 yards wide.

I don't know how wide the path is between the edge of the grass surface and the seating bowl wall, and this is the area that will be considered first for an expansion of the playing surface.

In addition, because the seating bowl is angled near the end lines, there is a possibility that a few rows of seats may have to be removed, or at least removed for soccer and re-installed as temporary seating for football.

(Thanks to commenter Orange44 for noting that I should include a description of the problem.)

I asked Gulati what he makes of the situation.

"It’s solvable, we believe," he answered.

And with that, we had some news.

Gulati did not give any details as to how it’s solvable. But I don’t think he would have used the word if he didn’t have some ideas.

Gulati also said that U.S. bid chief David Downs met with Mayor Nutter while in town for the Gold Cup.

Among the many factors in Philadelphia’s favor are that having games here would allow for a certain amount of regionalization of group play. A team could play games in some combination of Washington, New York, Boston and Philadelphia without having to travel excessively.

You could add a short plane ride to Chicago in that group, and there will probably be venues in the South too. If the Georgia Dome agrees to install temporary grass as it did for last week’s exhibition between Inter Milan and Club America, then Atlanta gets on the list. There will probably be at least one Florida venue as well, though the summer heat and humidity will be a factor.

Then there's a Western-oriented group of venues including Los Angeles, Seattle, Phoenix, Dallas and Houston. Put it all together and you have the “national event” Gulati wants to create.

"We'll certainly be playing in all time zones," Gulati said. That was not the case in 1994, as none of the nine venues were in the Mountain time zone. This time around, there are three candidates, led by the new Arizona Cardinals’ stadium in suburban Phoenix. It is enclosed and air conditioned, and with the huge Hispanic population in Phoenix I’m sure it will get consideration.

Denver and Salt Lake City are also in the mix right now, and could remain in play for a while if U.S. Soccer decides altitude is not a factor.

There’s a lot of politics to be played before anyone can think about playing soccer, and we’ll know more after the RFP responses are all in.

But at the moment, Philadelphia seems to be in a pretty good position should the U.S. World Cup bid succeed.

Here's audio of the conference call from U.S. Soccer's website. In case you ever wanted to know what my computer keyboard sounds like.

Posted by Jonathan Tannenwald @ 7:49 PM  Permalink | File Under: Soccer | 12 comments
12
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:07 PM, 07/28/2009
    So...the title of the article mentions the width problem, but there's nothing about that (or nothing in depth besides a few quoted lines) in the story. I would be curious to know why it's a problem, what could be done to fix it, the required width, etc...
    Orange44
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:26 PM, 07/28/2009
    What about the playing surface?
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:31 PM, 07/28/2009
    Good point. I added a description of the current surface and the requirements it needs to meet.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:34 AM, 07/29/2009
    Who cares!
    psu05
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:59 AM, 07/29/2009
    If the world cup came to the linc that would generate such a buzz in this city. It would be great.
    jeff518
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:14 AM, 07/29/2009
    I care.
    Preserve Jon
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:35 AM, 07/29/2009
    psu05 -- don't be a hater, I'm sure Penn State taught you better than that. Jon -- nice intel, Thanks! Did you add the part about the regionalization of group play? I know they did that in Germany, and it sucked! Teams should all play in one venue, but I understand that the host country wants to generate as much revenue as possible, so making teams play in three different cities is how they accomplished that goal. Trust me though, game days are AWESOME. I was in Kaiserslautern and Nuerenburg (sp?) and the expericne is something I'll never forget.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:35 PM, 07/29/2009
    Not that anyone really cares, but Arizona is not on mountain time. They're on Arizona Time. In the summer they are three hours behind (same as Pacific) and in the winter they are two hours behind (same as Mountain).
    greaser0305
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:58 PM, 07/29/2009
    soccerdad1150 - yes, the regionalization part was my idea. I more meant that a team could play, for example, in Washington, Philly and New York and not travel too much while going to multiple venues. greaser0305 - thanks for pointing that out. That might really put Denver and Salt Lake City more in play.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:36 PM, 07/29/2009
    Well Jonathan, that 'regionalization' thing has been done, and you are right, FIFA likes to do that. I believe the last two cups, 'group play' has meant traveling to three different venues.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:04 AM, 07/30/2009
    Sounds like we're a contender!
    BMarie
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:00 PM, 08/11/2009
    Isn't the Linc fairly new? They didn't account for soccer when they designed it? All the other NFL stadia did.
    kraftownzrevs


12 comments
About Jonathan Tannenwald
I fell in love with the Big 5 at first sight upon moving to Philadelphia in 2002. At various points in my journalistic career, I've covered all six of the region's Division I teams. During that time, I've eaten many soft pretzels from the Palestra's concession stands, which is how this blog got its name.

I write primarily about the University of Pennsylvania and the Ivy League, but I also cover the other basketball and football teams across the city from time to time. In the spring, you'll find coverage of the Penn Relays here.

In addition to all of that, I write Philly.com's soccer blog, The Goalkeeper.

You can contact me by email by clicking here.

Join on Facebook    Follow on Twitter

Latest College Videos