share
email
font size
options
 
Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Just after the Sixers/Nets held shootaround from 11-12 today at the RDX Sportsplex in Orlando, Sixers General Manager Ed Stefanski talked about the official opening of free agency and what that means for the Sixers, specifically point guard Andre Miller.

Here's Stefanski's answers to questions about what the Sixers might do in the next few weeks: 

Have you made a formal offer to point guard Andre Miller?
 
“We have made an offer to Andre and [agent] Andy Miller. But they’re looking for a better offer from other places. And I’d say right now we’re in the mode of if there is a sign-and-trade that makes sense for both parties.”
 
How far apart are you?
 
“I’d say we’re far apart.”
 
Does anything change in what you’re willing to offer Miller because other point guards like Mike Bibby and Jason Kidd received longer, bigger contracts?
 
“To me it’s a market for Andre Miller, not what other people get.”
 
What sign-and-trades are out there, or have you discussed?
 
“A couple, but not a lot. Andy Miller is canvassing the league trying to see if there are sign-and-trades that are possible. Talked to a couple of teams, but I wouldn’t say there is anything that’s imminent.”
 
Are you far apart in years, money, both?
 
“It’s both.”
 
What’s the next option, if it’s not Miller?
 
“Lou Williams is going to have an opportunity here; we’ve been grooming him for 4 years. We gave him a contract last year to play basketball, so he’ll have a great opportunity. The kid, here, [Jrue] Holiday, we’ll see how he progresses. And we’ll obviously go out and look for a guy for that position, too.”
 
What kind of guy would you try to get for that position?
 
“I think we’d look for a veteran who would help and compete for that starting position. This would be Eddie Jordan's [decision]: Is it Lou Williams job to lose, or bring that vet in to compete with him and then see how the rookie progresses … that’s an option, sure, you have to plan for all the options that will be available.”
 
Is Stefanski okay with the option of Lou Williams running the point?
 
“I’m fine with the option, I think Lou Williams has a chance to be that guy. Give him a shot. We’re in a situation where we have a young nucleus of guys who have playoff experience, but we’re going to grow with them. And to go long-term on a contract with an older point guard, we don’t see that as being a viable option right now.”
 
Has Stefanski’s view of Miller’s value changed since last season’s mid-season trading deadline?
 
“It changes when the market place changes, yes. The market place has changed dramatically …Andre Miller did a very nice job for us, but where we are stationed right now and what type of team we have, to go long-term is not a prudent decision for our franchise.”
 
But Stefanski is willing to do 1 year with Miller?
 
“Well, that’s something you’ll have to talk to Andy Miller about.”
 
The Sixers/Nets summer league team plays tonight at 7.
 
--Kate
Posted by Kate Fagan @ 1:25 PM  Permalink | 48 comments
48
Comments   
Posted 01:04 PM, 07/08/2009
Todd Pratt
Sounds to me that the Sixers see this up in coming season as wash. This is a good thing for this franchise to have a chance to turn it around.
Posted 01:10 PM, 07/08/2009
syddan26
The Sixers are in the driver's seat with Miller. There is NO team that is going to give him three years, thirty million. Miller's options are to take a mid-level exception from another team, hope that there is a team out there willing to do a sign and trade that is acceptible to the Sixers or accept the Sixers offer. Also, Mike Bibby's deal was three years, eighteen million. Miller is not nearly as good as Bibby. Miller and his agent are going to have to make a tough decision. It appears to me that the best option for him is take the Sixers offer. I doubt he will.
Posted 01:11 PM, 07/08/2009
Palestra Jon
The NBA salary cap takes no prisoners. Having gone all in with a bust, Elton Brand, Stefanski is a member of the walking dead. It's just a matter of when he will be fired---the Sixers are trapped in that contract and of Dalembert (which admittedly is not his fault) and Igodala. They will win 40 or so games, last at most one round in the playoffs and get a crappy draft pick. Next year the same. The year after the same. Watch for a curtin going up over the second deck at the Center.
Posted 01:11 PM, 07/08/2009
FetchDixon
Part ways with Miller. He is a rock solid point gaurd but they can't pay him big money over 5 years and hope to escape mediocrity. They need to shed salary and see what they have in the young guys. Speights, Williams, Holliday, Smith.. They need to know if these guys can play or not.
Posted 01:15 PM, 07/08/2009
bsaw
They had to know this was going to happen why wasn't he moved at the deadline?
Posted 01:35 PM, 07/08/2009
dpcoz
Don't back down on this one, Stefanski. Giving in means a Dalembert-type or Kenny Thomas-type contract. Let the rest of the league offer him better - if he gets something, he goes, and we're better off with a little cap space. The fans in Philadelphia know this is a salary cap thing above and beyond a keep Andre Miller thing.
Posted 01:41 PM, 07/08/2009
Irish Frank
If Stefanski thinks he can sign Miller, he is delusional. Time to move on!
Posted 01:47 PM, 07/08/2009
Nico Lange
Tell me again what Miller has won in his career to be so picky?
Posted 01:48 PM, 07/08/2009
molly24b
I think this is great.
Posted 01:51 PM, 07/08/2009
Serge_Matthews
who cares
Posted 02:00 PM, 07/08/2009
rvb2321
As mentioned earlier, I want the sixers to not make the playoffs this year. I would rather go with what I have, trade for what I can to get expiring contracts and rebuild with talent that is younger and be part of the organization longer. Unfortunately Sammy is stuck here forever but I really think either Iggy or Brand need to be moved just to establish a philosophy because AI will never be the shooter Brand to be a compliment to his game
Posted 02:01 PM, 07/08/2009
Digifant
Ed Stiff-anskee: you should haev traded Miller last season before the trade deadline, like we told you. The world knows (everyone but you) that Miller does not want to play in Philadelphia. Silly GM.
Posted 02:04 PM, 07/08/2009
76er
Serioulsy, Lou Williams as your starting point guard? Come on Ed. Wachovia Center is going to be empty next year. Gee, if you drafted a point guard who can play, this wouldn't be such an issue.
Posted 02:06 PM, 07/08/2009
76er
Why didn't Sixers trade Miller at the trade deadline last season. So now they get nothing for him, if a sign a trade doesn't pan out. I'm tired of this team bing a sub .500 or .500 team.
Posted 02:24 PM, 07/08/2009
theannswr6
Win 42-44 games with Andre Miller or 38-40 with Lou Williams, Jrue Holiday & a cheap veteran fill-in? Take the 38-40 with Lou Will and get the 14th pick instead of 17th, then go from there. Sam Dalembert, Willie Green & Jason Kapono will all be in the last year of their deals.
Posted 02:33 PM, 07/08/2009
Setdawgy
To theannsr6, Let me get this straight, If we have Andre Miller the 76ers get to play 86 games next year. If they don't sign him, we will only play 78? It goes to show you that the average sixers fan can't add and doesn't know how many games are played every year in the NBA (82). Ed I think you are safe for a while.
Posted 02:35 PM, 07/08/2009
tralala
Must be a slow news day for this to be a front page headline of philly.com...I think I speak for everyone when I say, "Who gives a poop!"
Posted 02:43 PM, 07/08/2009
LCVET
He will be a Laker or Blazer. Write it down.
Posted 02:47 PM, 07/08/2009
GoPhils09
Kate, you do a great job. I enjoy your work. You are insightful and clearly know the right questions to ask. As for the Miller situation, the Sixers have no choice but to sign him. Unless Williams has drastically improved his passing and court vision since last year, he simply can't be a starting point guard... although I think he can be valuable in pick and roll situations with Brand and also, he might be the only player on this team who can create his own shot. All of that said, I wouldn't want to get stuck with Miller for 3 more years. I don't think PG is the most important position right now, at least offensively. The sixers need a PG who can defend the perimeter and bring the ball up and set up the offense by either throwing it into Brand or passing to Iguodala off a curl or screen. Maybe the rookie can at least do that and anything else he gives you is gravy.
Posted 02:49 PM, 07/08/2009
brmorgen81
I think Lou Williams is a shooting guard, not a point guard. His biggest strength is obviously his quickness and his ability to blow by defenders on the perimeter and either go all the way to the rim or kick it out. His ball handling, decision making, and intelligence (let's face it, this guy isn't the sharpest tool in the shed...) are not his strengths, something which a point guard needs to be good at.
Posted 02:50 PM, 07/08/2009
GoPhils09
also, i like all the losers who take the time to read the headline, look at the article, and then scroll down and say "who cares" or "who gives a poop!" (who says that anyway??)... why comment on subjects you don't care about
Posted 02:52 PM, 07/08/2009
Palestra Jon
Getting Sammy off the cap won't be enough. Aside from the fact that the Sixers are capped out for 2 more years with him, they still have Brand (at $17 and $18 mill) for 2 after that and Iguodala (at $13.5, $14.7 and $16 mill) for 3 after that. So even if there are $20 mill or so to spend in 2011/12, are you going to be able to put a winner around Brand and Iguodala then? Brand looked old last year. What do you think he will look like 3 and 4 years from now. Who gave out these contracts? It'll be 6-8 years before the Sixers can be good again, because they will need to be terrible for a couple of years once they get below the cap.
Posted 02:59 PM, 07/08/2009
doctorj
Kate, this is solid information and it seems like Ed is being transparent and honest with us, which is a good thing. He can't come out and openly say that we're throwing this season away, but he can say that "we're gonna grow with our young nucleus of guys" and then let us interpret that as we see fit- which, to me, means we're rebuilding. Sounds like a plan- and a better plan than shooting for the #6 seed. They'll take a hit at the box office but they weren't going to draw well as they're currently configured anyway.
Posted 03:05 PM, 07/08/2009
1981Philly
You mean Miller doesn’t want to re-sign here?? What a shocker!! Could’ve had worked out a major deal for him two seasons ago when he was actually being mentioned as an MVP candidate and there were a number of contending teams looking for a PG. Lou Williams as a PG? Who the hell is Stefanski kidding with this? Lou Will couldn’t run an offense even if he was spotted a navigation system
Posted 03:20 PM, 07/08/2009
lalleva
Lou Williams at point is downright scary, not a chance he can run Jordan's offense, cause you have to pass the ball and not dribble for 18 seconds !!!!!! If Miller is not signed or a veteran point brought in the Sixers will be in the same place they are in now, very mediocre and one and done in the playoffs.
Posted 03:57 PM, 07/08/2009
theannswr6
setdawgy, or should i say moron.. win 42, 43, or 44 games with andre miller or 38, 39 or 40 with lou williams. follow? or do i need to break it down to kindergarten level?
Posted 04:04 PM, 07/08/2009
Kevin O.
Lose Miller. Were young and rebuilding. A bad year to develop our young guys and get a good draft pick next year will be the best in the long run. Miller got schooled by those young guards in the playoffs. Don't waste a penny on him. Against the elite teams he is a non factor.
Posted 04:37 PM, 07/08/2009
stigs
are we really running Elton Brand outta town after 20 games in a brand new system with mix-and-match parts?? did he look great? no is he overpaid? sure can he avg. 18/10/2 in the Eastern Conference? i sure think so
Posted 04:44 PM, 07/08/2009
hugh
The non-signing of Miller would be the best move Stefanski has made in his time here. If I was Ed, I wouldn't do a sign and trade either unless it came with expiring contracts and at least a second round pick. We are easily in a position of power here. If we don't sign him and he signs somewhere else - who cares. Hold out until a team calls with an appropriate sign and trade and then pull the trigger or just let him walk. Either way, he shouldn't be back. It just doesn't make sense.
Posted 04:48 PM, 07/08/2009
Clubmaker
Can we all realize and acknowledge the expertise and understanding of basketball by that GENIUS, "moron" BILLY KING!!!! He'll soon become a candidate for the office of governor of Pa.! What a pathetic JOKE!!!
Posted 04:51 PM, 07/08/2009
Palestra Jon
Stigs---not only was Brand overpaid, he was coming off an injury and he never was a running player. Turns out his knees are bad and he is a terrible fit for a young running team without an outside shooting threat. The only way he is an 18-10 man is if he is on a last place team who gets him his points as the team loses. Can you say "Roy Hinson?"
Posted 05:04 PM, 07/08/2009
Shenkman3
Why can't Stefanski and DiLeo do something creative for once? Steve Nash wants out of Phoenix. Steph Curry would have been a tremendous addition. The Celtics went from last place to a title in one year by being creative. Almost every other team is wheeling and dealing and the Sixers just sit. This team is boring. They are going nowehere this year and noone really cares. Absolutely terrible management!
Posted 05:19 PM, 07/08/2009
stigs
Palestra Jon: i agree Josh Smith would've been a better fit. Hindsight is always 20/20 though, I for one was pretty excited when Brand got here. The offense definitely seemed forced with him -- too many times they'd feed him on the block and stand around, then he shoots an 18-ft turnaround. I'm not saying he's gonna win an MVP or anything, I'm just not ready to give up on the whole thing just yet
Posted 05:37 PM, 07/08/2009
billythekid
Signing Miller for a year or two is fine, I might prefer a sign and trade instead if it makes sense since we aren't winning anything next year. Comments like, Bibby is much better (syddan26) than Miller just prove how much you haven't a clue about basketball. Maybe the old Bibby in Sactown but AM now is better than Bibby. Bibby does one thing better, shoot, but can't run a team as good as AM although at this point the Sixers could use a shooter more. And Dalembert's contract isn't the end of the world, its only 2 more years and if we can't get rid of him now than maybe we get rid of him for something next year.
Posted 05:37 PM, 07/08/2009
MikeP
One of the problems with the 76ers is that they are oen of those mediocre teams that are just good enough to make the playoffs but not good enough to win it all. An issue that is a problem is that because the finish in the middle, they don't get a top draft pick and don't have the cap room for another Free Agent. Trade Brandt and go young. Endure a few losing seasons and get better draft picks. They need to get on the other side the Dalembar and Brandt contracts and finish the team with a few Free Agents. They are 3-4 years away from even a chance at contending.
Posted 06:28 PM, 07/08/2009
nervegenerator
I think Stefanski knows what he's doing. The Sixers should develop their young players next year, and sign a free agent next year to become a real contender. Brand is an all-star PF when healthy folks...patience.
Posted 06:42 PM, 07/08/2009
bbrady25
Once again this organization just can't get it right. Last year you bring in Brand, a low post threat, on a team that thrived in transition??? And then you do nothing to bring in a 3pt shooter to stretch the defense so your 85mil low post scorer can attack the post. It was a big waist....should have gone after Marcus Camby instead and added Pietrus. You would have spent the same money and made your transition team better. And now you could possibly loose Miller and get nothing in return....he should have been traded before the deadline for an expiring contract and a number 1...Stefanski doesn't get it!!!!!! Just because u played basketball and graduated from Penn doesn't mean you can run a NBA franchise!
Posted 06:47 PM, 07/08/2009
Hugh_S
Palestra Jon is unfortunately spot on. I never liked the Brand siging from day one-not the mediocre first month, or the shoulder injury--DAY ONE. The only person that seemed to think it was a 'coup', was Ed Stefanski. An aging, 2nd banana with a time bomb in his ankle was gonna save our ship? A team needs a superstar these days to compete, bottom line. The best way to do that is through the draft, and even after AI, we never hit rock bottom to attain that player.
Comment removed.
Posted 09:28 PM, 07/08/2009
mjb
Sign and trade. Blazers. Steve Blake. Write it down.
Posted 09:43 PM, 07/08/2009
Shenkman3
Nervegenerator, the Sixers have one of the worst cap situations in the league. Iggy, Brand and Sam the Sham all make over 10 mill per for at least the next two seasons. We're done until at least three years. The only reason Brand came here is because we were one of the only teams with cap space last year. And it's all gone now.
Posted 10:48 PM, 07/08/2009
MrPhillie
At this point in the game, with the team the Sixers are bringing back, it really makes no sense to offer Miller anything more than one year. Of course he won't take it, but put it out there and if he takes it great, and if not then you are one step closer to being able to do some things next year. I agree with others who say that winning 42-44 games with Miller vs 38 without is not worth giving Miller a 3-4 year contract. Seems pretty simple at this point.
Posted 10:58 PM, 07/08/2009
lanzascat
they should have traded him the season before this at the trade deadline. his value was high and they could have gotten something for him as well as finished in a better draft position. you'd think that the same idiots that run the flyers were running the sixers...oh wait...they are.
Posted 11:17 PM, 07/08/2009
natedog
miller is a sieve defensively. question is who leaves town first andre or president pumpkinhead. eddie i hear bonner needs an asst.
Posted 11:19 AM, 07/09/2009
KMG
This team is not going to compete with Boston, Orlando and Clevelnad next year with or without Miller. Why not give Williams a chance to see what he can do as a starter so we know if that is a need going forward? As for everyone killing the Brand signing now, that's bit of revisionist history- everyone, including me, loved the deal when they made it. I wish I saved the blogs; they would illustrate that point.
Posted 01:03 PM, 07/09/2009
C-Bent
theannswr, you really think a 14th pick is really going to help them that much more than a 17th pick? If you don't get a top 3 pick your first round pick probably wont make a difference so they may as well go as far as they can in the playoffs and attract some free agents. Brand would never have signed there if they hadn't made the playoffs nor would anyone else.
Posted 02:07 PM, 07/09/2009
Oliver
Elton Brand averaged 16 points and 10 rebounds in the games he played last year, while having no shooters on the court to spread the court, while playing under two different coaches, while playing for a brand new team, while working in a system that was in no way designed for a post-up power forward. So yeah, there's no way he could average 18 points, 10 rebounds next year. ...God, I hate Philly fans, even though I am one.
Posted 07:53 PM, 07/16/2009
lharris537
Don't know if anyone is interested in 76er-ville, but Nova's Dante Cunningham put up 21 and 22 points in his first two Vegas summer league games for Portland. Nine boards the first game, seven the second.
Latest Sixers Videos
About Deep Sixer Blog
Kate Fagan was, until recently, the all-time leading three-pointer shooter in the University of Colorado women’s basketball program. Her former teammates say that’s because she was also the all-time leading three-point taker in program history. Somewhere along the way, journalism became her passion, and there are those who say that she still likes taking her shots. This is her second season as the 76ers beat writer for The Inquirer. She brings a rare combination of first-hand basketball insight, writing ability and an attitude that fits perfectly in her new hometown.
Deep Sixer Videos