Home-run call appeared to be correct

share
email
print
reprint
font size
comments
18
options
 
Sitting in the front row of Section 107, Steve Davis saw the ball coming his way. He thought he had a chance to catch the deep drive off the bat of Alex Rodriguez in the fourth inning.

He reached out his right hand. But the ball fell well short. And Davis heard a loud "doink."

Phils' manager Charlie Manuel looks skyward during batting practice as the weather potentially will be a factor in Game 3 of the 2009 World Series at Citizens Bank Park Oct. 31, 2009. ( David Maialetti / Staff Photographer )
1 of 41
The ball hit a camera.

It was originally called a double in the Yankees' 8-5 victory over the Phillies in Game 3 and later ruled a two-run home run when the umpires consulted instant replay - the first such use ever in the postseason.

Phillies fans sitting in Sections 106 and 107 mostly agreed that it looked as if the ball would have cleared the fence had the camera not been there. But no one could definitively know.

"It was hard to tell," said Davis, 46, of Vineland, N.J.

Television replays showed that the ball struck the right side of the camera, just missing the lens. The camera was situated above the gray metal fencing that runs across the top of the outfield wall and hung about 10 inches over the wall and into play.

"Because we cannot control what the cameraman does with the camera, one of the specific ground rules is that if the ball hits the camera, it's a home run," crew chief Jerry Davis said.

Thus, the camera is just like a fan reaching over the fence and touching the ball. It's a home run once the ball hits it.

The cameraman, Matthew McGahan, said he did not get a clear view of the ball because he was looking into the camera when the ball struck. But he said he believed the ball would have been a home run regardless.

"I'm upset I didn't have a good shot," he said.

McGahan's press credential said he worked for MLB International, but he said he was also shooting for Fox. He said that fans were yelling at him after the play but that no one threw anything at him.

An inning after the ball hit the camera, fans were still shouting at McGahan. One said, "Wait to talk to your lawyer!" Attempting to shy away from further controversy, McGahan put his headset on and began texting on his cell phone.

"I'm a Phillies fan, but it looked like a home run to me," said Shawn O'Neill, 26, of Collegeville. O'Neill was sitting a few rows up in Section 106, where the camera was situated in the corner, adjacent to the foul pole.

Dan Bell, a Fox spokesman, said camera positions were approved and vetted by Major League Baseball and the umpiring crew. Before each playoff series, Fox conducts a site survey with MLB officials to determine camera positions, Bell said. Then, before each playoff game, the umpires check the positions to make sure they are legal. Jerry Davis confirmed it.

"So everything is approved before a pitch is thrown in a game," Bell said. "This is an approved, standard position for that camera in the outfield."

An industry source said last night that the camera was expected to be moved back out of play for Game 4 tonight.

Bell could not recall any other instances in which a ball in play hit a camera.

Umpires' use of instant replay to clarify home-run calls began in late August 2008. Rodriguez is no stranger to it - the first use of instant replay came on a ball he hit during a regular-season game against Tampa Bay on Sept. 3, 2008.

This was the third time instant replay was used at Citizens Bank Park. From the fans' vantage point in right field, the right call was made.

"We booed," said Paul Stoltzfus, a 24-year-old native of Reading who was sitting in Row 5 of Section 106. "But it was the right call."


Contact staff writer Matt Gelb at 215-854-2928 or mgelb@phillynews.com.

share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
18
Comments   
Posted 09:26 AM, 11/01/2009
Boethius
In reading other posts, other are saying (and I ahve no idea if this is true) the normal Phillie ground rules are the camera is in play. However, they are saying that the umps decided before the game any ball hitting the camera is a HR, but they failed to discuss this ground rule change with either team. Is this the case? If so, it would be interesting to know if this was inappropriate and either : 1) the Phils has a reason to protest; or 2)it was just bad form by the umps not to reveal any change in ground rules.
Posted 10:16 AM, 11/01/2009
jingles
THE OFFICIAL MLB GROUND RULES, here is a section regarding cameras: * Any cameras or microphones permanently attached on railings are treated as part of the railings and are in play. * Any recessed railings or poles that are in the dugout and photographers areas are out of play and should be marked with red to mark them out of play. Seems to me, hitting the camera, would make the ball in play, and not a home run.
Posted 10:32 AM, 11/01/2009
Reid Must Go
someone needs to get fired for this. How can you have a camera sticking out over the fence? Whether the right call was made or not that camera should have been back further.
Posted 10:36 AM, 11/01/2009
eman
I just don't see why the camera lenses have to extend beyond the top of the walls. Back them up 12 inches and there's no issue; the ball either skims over the top as a home run, or hits the top of the wall and bounces back into play. Move the cameras back, MLB.
Posted 11:21 AM, 11/01/2009
hobbit
Am I the only one tired of hearing about "post-season" records? Why not cover League Championship Series Records and World Series Records separately? They are diluting the records of prior World Series players because of the significantly larger number of games played today. Just a thought.
Posted 11:33 AM, 11/01/2009
CrotchetyOldMan
Look at the replay on MLB - it's a close call, but if you look at the ball's downward trajectory, I really think it would have hit off the fence. If the rule was as explained in the article, why was there any need to look at the replay? In any case, Hamels sucks.
Posted 11:35 AM, 11/01/2009
CrotchetyOldMan
Look at the replay on MLB - it's a close call, but if you look at the ball's downward trajectory, I really think it would have hit off the fence. If the rule was as explained in the article, why was there any need to look at the replay? In any case, Hamels s*cks.
Posted 11:46 AM, 11/01/2009
CrotchetyOldMan
Oops - I thought my first post didn't make it because of a certain word. Sorry.
Posted 12:17 PM, 11/01/2009
Pelti
my problem is mostly 2 things. One, with the angle it was coming down, there's no way you can say what it would have done, maybe it clears the fence by a hairs breadth, maybe it hits the rail and bounces into the stands, maybe it bounces back onto the field. Two, the normal rules say that cameras on fences are in play, why change it last night? Plus, if Texiera doesn't walk on an obvious strike 3, Hamels likely pitches A-Roid differently.
Posted 12:21 PM, 11/01/2009
atp2007
Why isn't there just a set rule, either "hit the camera for a double" or "hit the camera for a homer", so there is no decision to be made as to where the ball might have landed. Why is the camera hanging into the playing area like an interfering fan anyway?
Posted 12:40 PM, 11/01/2009
flabird1954
Having covered the Phils for 26 years as a photographer, the camera was clearly in play having the lens almost a foot past the rail. The cameraman was at fault because he should not have let the lens hang over the wall. The spirit of the decision that was made before the game was that if the camera was hit and the ball fell back onto the field it would be a HR and not a GRD. But since the camera impeded the path of the ball it is a GRD. They made the right call the first time.
Posted 12:41 PM, 11/01/2009
longshanks
You people are whiny cry babies. Just stop it. It was a home run. No doubt about it. You'll find anything to whine about and to blame for a loss. Grow up losers.
Posted 12:46 PM, 11/01/2009
mechfan2240
Well, take away those two runs, and the Phils still lose. Baseball is a game of ifs and judgement calls. Bottom line is Cole did what he's been doing most of the year, and he also had a bit of bad luck when some of the bloops fell in.
Posted 01:17 PM, 11/01/2009
MrHockeyFan
jingles (and others upset with the homerun call), just a little something to consider: Those official MLB Ground Rules you posted apply to two things: 1) cameras and equipment PERMANENTLY attached to railings (which this camera wasn't), and 2) cameras and equipment stationed in out-of-play sections of the park (the dugout and photographers areas--which this camera wasn't). The reason this camera was treated differently from the equipment listed in the rules is because this camera was positioned differently from the equipment listed in the rules. Obviously it wasn't going to be ruled out of play--I don't think anyone's arguing that--but it also would not have fallen into the category of PERMANENTLY stationed equipment, and so the umps had to determine a specific ground rule. In this case, they decided that an impermanent camera hanging over a railing would be considered the same as a fan hanging over the railing; I'm not sure that I agree with the rule that calls fan interference an automatic home run, but I see no problem with deciding ahead of time not to differentiate between a fan's hand and an impermanent camera.
Posted 01:19 PM, 11/01/2009
TheReck82
Yeah, and Yankees/NY fans in general aren't whiners
Latest Sports Videos
Sign up to receive the daily sports newsletter