Could Phila. make more on its marathon?

share
email
print
reprint
font size
comments
18
options
 
In three weeks, a record number of runners are expected to take to Philadelphia's streets and compete in the city's 16th annual marathon.

With 10,000 entrants, the event with a budget of $1.7 million can count on a fourth consecutive year of growth while pumping $10 million into the regional economy and aiding seven local charities.

JACQUELYN MARTIN / Associated Press
Runners compete in the 34th Annual Marine Corps Marathon. The fifth-largest U.S. marathon, with 18,219 competitors in 2008, it runs in a loop from Arlington, Va., and into Washington.
1 of 5
Those seem impressive numbers, until one looks elsewhere.

Take Chicago, for instance, where the marathon has 45,000 entrants and contributes $140 million to the economy, according to a University of Illinois study. The similarly sized New York marathon, being run today, means $220 million to that city. Both races generate tens of millions of dollars for scores of charities.

Overall last year, Philadelphia's marathon ranked 12th in size in the United States, trailing the monsters like New York, Chicago, and Boston, but also races in Orlando and Portland, Ore.

Why does that matter?

Well, for every runner, particularly out-of-town runners, the city can benefit in a variety of ways: meals bought, hotel rooms booked, stores shopped.

As the business of running booms - and the city searches ways to boost tourism - Philadelphia's premier footrace lags behind in size and economic impact.

It does so despite the best efforts of the City Representative's Office, which organizes the event and has plans for making it bigger in the future.

That the city is involved at all is rare. Philadelphia's marathon is one of the increasingly few major running events owned and operated by a municipality. The marathons in New York, Chicago, and Boston, for instance, are independent of their host cities and have professional race directors with extensive marathon experience.

Here, the race is managed by the City Representative, a political appointee who can expect to be replaced with each new mayor. Melanie Johnson took the position two years ago after serving as Mayor Nutter's campaign spokeswoman. She admits she had a lot to learn about the marathon business.

And it is a business.

In New York, for instance, the race takes in $45 million in revenue. Race director Mary Wittenberg oversees a staff of 120 that puts on 49 other events year-round leading up to the city's crown jewel.

Here, Johnson oversees the marathon while juggling her other duties, which include organizing the Welcome America Fourth of July program and generally promoting the city.

"We are good at multitasking," she said in a recent interview, when asked if the race might be better served if outsourced or even sold to a private group whose only focus was the marathon.

"The marathon is one of the most successful events we have. It really broadens our ability to promote our city. Why shouldn't the city do it?"

The question was put to City Controller Alan Butkovitz, who conceded he had not previously given it any thought. His quick conclusion, however, was there was value in considering privatizing the race.

"Certainly there are incentives for a private manager to maximize sponsorships vs. a bureaucratic approach that just minimizes headaches for a city department that has many other responsibilities," he said.

Indeed, sponsorships can be a critical fund-raising tool for major marathons.

The title sponsorship alone for the ING New York Marathon is worth more than $1 million, Wittenberg said. The nonprofit event's 2006 IRS filing reported about $10 million in sponsorships, or about a third of the total revenue that year.

Page:   1  of  3  View All
1 |   2 |   3      Next»
share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
18
Comments   
Posted 07:11 AM, 11/01/2009
Dadair1
If the city is running it, don't look forward to increase revenue.
Posted 07:39 AM, 11/01/2009
BMVILLA
This is a good article and there seems to be a lot of wasted resources and opportunities here. One example is that there is frequent turnover in managing the race every few years due to the political appointment of the race manager. Second, why should the various races be on the same day as well as on much of the same course? Expanding the marathon's applicant pool on a given day should increase revenue-laden tourism dollars, especially with overflow from other marathons' entry or lottery limitations. Third, the race management should be conducted by specialists, maybe that would even result in more city races, much less additional revenue. Clearly, this should be the case, especially in light of parades and festivals having to pay their way. Why not for races?
Posted 09:52 AM, 11/01/2009
jerseyjoe
As a marathon runner and a local guy, I can tell you simply that the aforementioned cities that conduct marathons are much more visitor- friendly and accessible as in walkability than Philly. One minute you're in a nice area, turn the corner and it's a crackden. Philly has more soul, but it also has urban blight that steers many away...including locals/students/young, professional families.
Posted 11:40 AM, 11/01/2009
TJones
It would be hard to create a 26 mile course in Philadelphia without going through a crack den. Sad but true.
Posted 11:53 AM, 11/01/2009
spider9
This was a very good article and raises some good questions. Why does the city have the 1/2 marathon and 8K race on the same day? The Philly Distance Run in Sept provides a good 1/2 marathon for people who aren't up for a full marathon. I would experiment with ditching the 1/2 and keeping the 8K (or switch to a more standard distance - 10K).
Posted 02:14 PM, 11/01/2009
Byron
I am a runner but never did a marathon. I mostly run the shorter distances and I will soon try for a half marathon. I think that it makes more sense to have the two shorter races together on a different date. This would open up more slots for all runners. Now the marathon can go up to 20K. With a route that goes thru hilly Manayunk, I certainly won't be able to finish. We need a flat, fast 26 mile route for guys like me.
Posted 02:37 PM, 11/01/2009
dww2001
I think the obvious reason why the Philly marathon is behind a lot of these other cities has nothing to do with walkability or crime (there are plenty of terrible areas in Chicago that aren't very far from its pretty downtown). First off, the Philly marathon is not nearly as prestigious mainly because it has only been around for 16 years, as opposed to the 100 plus years running of the Boston Marathon for example. Secondly, the city needs to get a private company to sponsor and run this thing because as long as its the whims of Philly elected officials it will never maximize its potential. Comcast, are you listening? I think the race has been making decent strides and with the right management it could really be an elite race.
Posted 02:38 PM, 11/01/2009
lipsfan5568
The lower attendance for the marathon is hardly due to the neighborhoods in which the race is run, despite the misinformed comments of previous posters. It is entirely a result of limited available spots. The marathon sells out quickly. The Broad St run and Distance run are all very well attended. I agree that the 8K and half marathons should either be eliminated or run on a different day. There of plenty of regional opportunities to run shorter distances....not so with the marathon. The marathon alone could easily attract 25,000+ runners.
Posted 02:39 PM, 11/01/2009
WildBill
Melanie Johnson clearly sees the bigger picture (<--sarcasm)
Posted 03:16 PM, 11/01/2009
anon
Let Temple U. run this. At least they have a good sports rec and STHM program, and would make a proper event and make money.
Posted 07:04 PM, 11/01/2009
drcrusher
Having the half-marathon on the same day is a mistake, especially considering the excellent Philadelphia Distance Run is only two months before. In 2004 I ran the marathon and there was no half; in 2008, I found the experience to be much diminished by the sheer numbers of halfers crowding the first part of the race. Many of the people around me at the 13-mile point peeled off to finish, which was momentarily discouraging -- not only were all these people around me finished while I had 13 miles to go, but suddenly I was no longer in a group of runners to push off of. Two years ago I trained for the Philly marathon only to find that registration had closed before I could enter; I learned from my mistake and last year I made sure to register well in advance. It is a major negative that the cap is for all three races total, not individual races. I am sure the people signing up for the shorter races have locked out many marathoners, as happened to me in 2007. If they are going to promote the Philadelphia MARATHON, then perhaps they should allot the bulk of the total entry cap to that race.
Posted 08:14 PM, 11/01/2009
jerseyjoe
Maybe I misworded my feelings: Yes, there is urban blight in many marathon cities, and it would be difficult to maintain safe, comfortable running areas in any major city, but my logic was because of our high crime rate and due to the excessive crime areas in Philly that are unaccessible to vistors who don't want to be robbed/raped/mugged, than Philly will always be second-tiered with marathon $$$. Make more of the city safe to just walk around and more people will come. Try visiting NYC or Boston sometime and you'll be exhausted with all the walking, and Boston is smaller than Philly, but its walkability leaves Philly to shame. Walkability = Vistors = $$$
Posted 08:32 AM, 11/02/2009
phillytwo
"Controller Butkovitz did not give it any thought". What exactly is he thinking about as he drives around in his huge GMC Denali with the full police package?
Posted 08:44 AM, 11/02/2009
usnr
The city representative (a political appointee) is the problem. We need someone who knows running and can work with all of the area groups to put together the best event. Look at the Broad Street run, you have great people (Jim Marino and staff) who know what they are doing. We do not need someone from outside come in and takeover.
Posted 09:15 AM, 11/02/2009
longdistancerunner
Having run this marathon on several occasions as well as being the President of the Bucks County Road Runners club this article makes a mark. The city needs to make a decision as to whether or not they want to make this a destination event like those in other cities. If they do then they will need professional management. There is a lot of potential for the city to make money on this but they will have to change their attitude about the event. The Philadelphia Distance run has gone this route in associating with the other Rock 'n' Roll Marathon events and it has become a destination event. The only drawback with this is that in becoming a destination event it lost a lot of it's local flavor for those of us who have been participating for many years. If they want the marathon to be a local event then the city may want to reach out to the local running organizations for help in organizing. Philadelphia is a great city to run in. You have areas like the Drives, Wissahickon and Fairmount Park where you can run. Plus, the city supports three great races, Broad Street 10 miler in May, Philadelphia Distance run in September and the Marathon in November. This doesn't even include all of the other local races that are put on each year. My feeling is that the Marathon could be and should be better and the city needs to reach out to the running community rather then a political appointee to help organize the race.
Sign up to receive the daily sports newsletter