Posted: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 10:57 PM | 133 comments |
 
options
 

CHICAGO -- Eighty-two games in the regular season. Twenty-two games in the Stanley Cup playoffs. And now, for the Flyers, one final game of goaltender roulette.

On a night when the Chicago Blackhawks asserted themselves in a way that neither team had been able to accomplish to this point, Flyers coach Peter Laviolette finds himself in the position of having to make a huge decision as his team now faces elimination.

Who is the goaltender, Michael Leighton or Brian Boucher?

For the second time, Laviolette found it necessary to yank Leighton out of a game in the Stanley Cup Final. It was at the end of the first period of the 7-4 loss that sends the Flyers home trailing by three games to two.

There were two dynamics at play as that first period ended with the Blackhawks holding a 3-0 lead. The first dynamic was that Chicago mixed up its line combination and came out storming in a manner that they had not shown since their 6-5 victory in Game 1. The second dynamic was that, despite the aforementioned storming, the Flyers’ deficit would have been only 1-0 had Leighton been able to stop the stoppable shots.

But there were two bad goals, and it was Boucher in the net for the second period. Leighton sat on the bench wearing a baseball cap. And now Laviolette has 2 days to think about a decision that likely will be dissected either way for years to come, if it goes bad.

Leighton or Boucher? Oh, and no pressure on the outcome.

And, after the game, Laviolette said, “I don’t have an answer for that.”

Down the hall from the interview room where Laviolette sat at the United Center, there was more intrigue. As it turns out, CBC showed in its broadcast a tape of Leighton getting hit by a shot, apparently on an unprotected part of his knee, and leaving the pre-game warmups early. How it might have affected his play is unclear -- because, to be fair, he did make some good saves in the first few minutes, when the Blackhawks were really coming hard.

Leighton said, “Yeah, I took a shot off of my knee in warmups, but it didn’t affect my performance at all.”

So there is that. There also is a team full of players that is well-aware of the kicking it just endured. The last thing any of the Flyers was going to do was bury the goaltender, especially since nobody knows where Laviolette is headed on this thing.

As captain Mike Richards said, speaking for all of them, “It was just us leaving a goaltender out to dry.”

As for Boucher, he said his job in that situation is to come in and play shutout hockey, which he did not do. “I needed to shut the door,” Boucher said.

When asked about starting Game 6, Boucher said, “I don’t know if there’s any issue there.”

Logic says that, just as after pulling Leighton after allowing five goals in Game 1, Laviolette will return to Leighton again. It is neater and simpler and projects an image of calm at a tempestuous time. It is easy enough to make the argument that, after a game when the Blackhawks came out and ran the Flyers over in the first period, the last thing the Flyers need is some undue emotional upset. Besides, Leighton is so much better at home, and that is where this series is heading.

But there is another side to this, the reality side of it. And the reality is that the Flyers might very well have won the game if the goaltender had been better. That isn’t to say that Boucher was spectacular or anything. But the truth is the truth, and it should have been 1-0 at the end of the first, and none of us can predict how the Blackhawks might have reacted -- how frustrated they might have been, and how that frustration might have manifested itself -- had Leighton been better.

The first goal -- a Brent Seabrook shot that deflected off of Flyers defenseman Chris Pronger -- was not Leighton’s fault. But the second goal was -- Dave Bolland, taking a rebound off of the backboards and sneaking it between Leighton’s skate and the post. And the second goal was -- Kris Versteeg, skating from left to right at the top of the circle and then beating Leighton back to the left.

It was pretty obvious, at that point, that Leighton was going to be pulled at the end of the period -- and it is exactly what happened. And, again, Boucher was unspectacular in his two periods, allowing three goals of his own and making a couple of good saves. There isn’t an obvious choice, which means that it probably will be Leighton for Game 6.

But you wonder.

It isn’t a good time to be wondering.
 

Posted by Rich Hofmann @ 10:57 PM  Permalink | 133 comments
133
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:02 PM, 06/06/2010
    came out flat....too many penalties. Just need a two game winning streak.
    nwphillyguy
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:03 PM, 06/06/2010
    "And the reality is that the Flyers might very well have won the game if the goaltender had been better" C'mon Rich, the team was horrible tonight. Tough to win when you can clear, and can't finish. Yeah goaltending was bad, but the team was worse.
    n62
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:03 PM, 06/06/2010
    The Flyers picked a great time to revert back to regular season form.
    robertthomas
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:05 PM, 06/06/2010
    Theyre going to be back, this is the first time it happened this playoff but I'm going to say it, they shouldv'e stuck with Leighton!! Its only the 2nd period and to be honest when he was in goal the Flyers couldn't get rid of the puck out of the zone...
    PSF4eva
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:06 PM, 06/06/2010
    And only a couple of High stick including one with blood kept the Bhawks ahead. Flyers still beat the greatest team of all time in 7.
    rgreen72
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:07 PM, 06/06/2010
    stick with Leighton
    Daddio
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:07 PM, 06/06/2010
    it was a great run, but I think it is over.
    scars73
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:07 PM, 06/06/2010
    Lets go Blackhawks. Any team that has a right wingnut for an owner and has Palin drop the puck must lose. One more loss and we won't see Snyder near the Cup in his miserable lifetime!!!!
    JonKap
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:07 PM, 06/06/2010
    Bobby Abreu, I mean Jeff Carter, is just brutal in this series. Gagne too. Just imagine what this team could be in these 5 million dollars a year players showed up.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:08 PM, 06/06/2010
    Took one on the chin tonight boys. What happened to the great Pronger. -5, 2 pim, got buried by DB, and Kane made him look stupid. Love the story lines. Earlier, it was "Philly looks like a Champion". Now its "Philly faces Elimination". Hawks have unfinished business, good luck.
    Coldsteelonice29
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:08 PM, 06/06/2010
    only positive was they never quit on the game,but it was such a pathetic first period it was tough to be worse. Hopefully they have enough pride not to let a team raise the cup on your ice, since it will be tough to beat the hawks in a game 7 on their ice. Wonder what would of happened if richards and leino cash in on their open nets.
    xMikelaw19
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:08 PM, 06/06/2010
    i think they have to go with boucher. the hawks have zeroed in on leighton's obvious weakness on the high stick side. he was beaten again in the first, but the hawk defender missed the net. really hoping to read a wed night headline that says Game 7: Necessary.
    djack10
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:09 PM, 06/06/2010
    Teams win and lose games and series all the time, but that was one of the most disgraceful performances I can remember. I would think that professionals would have more pride in themselves and their craft than to embarrass the franchise, the fans and the city in such a manner.
    Hame of Famer
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:09 PM, 06/06/2010
    All chicago losers - stick to your own messge boards!
    Daddio


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About Rich Hofmann
Rich Hofmann arrived at the Daily News in 1980 for a job whose status was officially designated as "full-time, temporary." A senior at Penn at the time, he was hired to fill in on the copy desk during a staff illness. The notion of him covering the Eagles or being a columnist did not exist in anyone's imagination. It was supposed to be six weeks and out, but he never left. It is only one of the reasons why so many people have concerns about him as a potential house guest. Rich has blogged the postseasons of the Flyers and Eagles. E-mail Rich at hofmanr@phillynews.com

Join on Facebook    Follow on Twitter