Sunday, February 14, 2016

Did Scott Hartnell request a trade?

(Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)
(Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

When news broke of Scott Hartnell being traded, the motives behind the deal were somewhat of a mystery. The Flyers were getting a seemingly less skilled player in return, along with a fourth-round draft pick for 2015. The first round of hints and insinuations have arrived, and they are painting Hartnell himself as the primary impetus for driving the deal through.

Muttering from hockey writers is one thing, but Hartnell's statements to Columbus general manager Jarmo Kekalainen, as relayed to Blue Jackets beat writer Aaron Portzline, seem interesting.

"[Hartnell] had a lot of questions, but the only real hard question he had for me is, he wanted to know that we are committed to winning," Kekalainen told The Columbus Dispatch. "He said, 'I want to win. I’m 32 years old. I’ve made a lot of money. I want to win.' That’s basically the question I wanted to hear, the answer I wanted to get. That’s why he’s coming here and that’s what he wants to do."

More coverage
  • Box score: Flyers 5, Sabres 1
  • POLL: Should the Flyers be active at the trade deadline?
  • Download FREE Philly Sports Now app for iPhone!
  • Buy Flyers jerseys and other gear
  • Forum: Did Flyers make right moves in offseason?
  • Latest hockey odds
  • Was trading Scott Hartnell for R.J. Umberger and a 2015 fourth-round draft pick a good deal?

    Hartnell waived his no-movement clause in order to go to Columbus, a decision he made after speaking at length with Kekalainen. This paints a pretty clear picture, one that at least temporarily clears Flyers general manager Ron Hextall from making an odd trade of a franchise mainstay with deep roots in the community.

    There's nothing particularly villainous about a player wanting a trade. Hartnell reportedly said his priority is to win at this point, not to spurn the Flyers. However, it does create a new context for the deal as a whole. The presence of a no-movement clause in his contract alone is enough to indicate the trade needed his blessing to be executed.

    The darker message is that Hartnell didn't feel Philadelphia was his best chance to win the Stanley Cup.
    We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
    Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

    Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

    Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

    Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

    Read 0 comments
    comments powered by Disqus
    Latest Videos:
    Also on
    letter icon Newsletter