Why did the Texans trade Ryans?
Philly.com, Inquirer, and Daily News coverage of the Eagles
Why did the Texans trade Ryans?
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. -- After Texans coach Gary Kubiak spoke glowingly of DeMeco Ryans for several minutes, the question was asked: “Well, if he’s so great, why didn’t you keep him?”
It’s the question many in Philadelphia have been asking themselves after the Eagles apparently got the better of the Houston Texans in last week’s trade for the middle linebacker. The explanation then from Eagles coach Andy Reid and general manager Howie Roseman was that Ryans no longer fit the Texans’ scheme.
Houston had moved from a 4-3 to a 3-4 after Wade Phillips became defensive coordinator, and Ryans was only on the field approximately 50 percent of the time. And because the Texans had salary cap issues they couldn’t justify paying a part-time linebacker nearly $6 million a year.
“You have to make decisions – cap decisions, going-forward decisions,” Kubiak said Tuesday morning at the NFL owners meetings. “There’s a lot of things that go into account of why you trade a player or have to release a player nowadays. Obviously in the NFL nowadays every year you’re putting together a team. Holding that same group of guys together for 10-15 years doesn’t exist anymore.”
Still, if Ryans could beat out Brian Cushing as the Texans’ three-down inside linebacker he would still be in Houston. Cushing is a talented player and he’s two years younger than the 27-year-old Ryans. But Ryans was once a two-time Pro Bowl linebacker and there are legitimate concerns about his return from a 2010 ruptured Achilles tendon.
Ryans admitted last week that he was slow at the start of last season. But the general consensus – one the Eagles share – was that he was close to his old self by the end of the year.
“No doubt, he played his best football for us at the end of the year, there’s no doubt about that,” Kubiak said. “Absolutely no doubt. He battled his elbow, he battled his Achilles, but at the end of the year he played his best football for us.”
When the trade was announced – Houston received a fourth round draft pick and a higher third round pick – several Texans decried the loss of their leader. Cushing tweeted that he wouldn’t be “half the player or person” without Ryans as his mentor.
“All you have to do is turn the film on and watch him,” Kubiak said. “He runs the show. Everybody goes to him, they trust him so much and what he’s doing. He really raised Cushing in a lot of ways. … He’s just a guy on the field that gave everybody some calm: ‘Hey, I got it under control. What are we doing? What’s our adjustment?’ DeMeco let us know we got it.”
Every Thursday night Ryans organized a team get-together, Kubiak said.
“He’s an old Southern boy. He’s as country as they come,” the coach said. “He’s tough as nail. He’s all man. He’s stands for all the right stuff.”
Kubiak said that Ryans could still be a three-down linebacker “in the right defense.” Last season, the Eagles kept middle linebacker Jamar Chaney on the field for all three downs for most of the season. But he struggled in pass coverage, as many linebackers do, and was on the sidelines on passing downs by the end of the season.
With more defenses switching to a 3-4 and with an already pass-happy league becoming even more obsessed with airing it out, the three-down middle linebacker is becoming a bit of a dinosaur. New Raiders coach Dennis Allen hasn’t yet decided if Oakland will stay with the 4-3 or switch to a 3-4.
“When you look at the traditional MIKE linebacker, the big, tough, physical run-stopping type of guy – I think the way that the league is going with the passing game now I think it’s going to a little bit more of a speed and athleticism type of position,” Allen said. “I think that’s where you’ll see the evolution of the MIKE linebacker.”
Sometimes teams are better off letting go a good player. It doesn't mean the player isn't good anymore at all, which I hope is the case. Houston isn't in the best cap situation, coupled with the change in defensive philosophy, I think they felt they owed it to Ryans to put him in a better situation. I think if there was something really wrong with him, they wouldn't hesitate to trade him within their division, a la McNabb.— cjh136- Before rushing to any judgment, one should reflect upon the Eagles' sterling record of injured player acquisitions. Last year alone, there was Steve Smith and Tackle Ryan Harris (who never even made it through training camp).
- Eagles made an excellent deal. Give Howie Roseman his propers. He's an aggressive young fella.— soulman386
- Interesting how this "switch" to the 3-4 is only done by teams with a weak pass rush AND who don't have "the, big, tough, physical run-stopping type guy". Well, the Eagles have both now. HOWEVER, we still need another LB and a RIGHT TACKLE.— Craig321
- So why did they trade Ryans? This article answers nothing.— NancyNancy
- Good pick up. Better than any LB already on the roster. Let's see if he can fit into the wide nine better than the 3-4.— philadelphiachild51
- @soulman. truedat! Howie might have finally got one right. The old blind squirrel finding an acorn?— StorminNorman
- Craig321 nails it! I would add to his "however"..still need a run-stopping safety.— billtfla
- Hey Nancy
The article does exactly that. It tells you that Houston switched defenses and he was not a great fit, especially at that cap number. If fans remember its exactly how the Eagles got Hugh Douglaus from the Jets years ago when they switched schemes— mcat13 - yes and we know how hugh douglas thrived with the eagles. Jusr cause teams trade a player especialy after injury isnt always an indicator of declin. Just like VILMA he went to the saints after the jets for no real apparent reason. Still had good years. SO lets just wait and see shall we and put the majic eightball away— Lambo1
- I will be among the first to criticize football's Gold Standard. However, this move was very low risk for potentially very high reward. They kept their offensive line in tact and re-signed Jackson. A+ off-season up to this point. Unfortunately, draft day 2012 will bring the grade down. It always does.— ManU63
- mcat13...Going from a 4-3 to a 3-4 is one of the theories, as it has been since the trade...but so are the achilles injury and the elbow, and whether he can really play for all 3 downs. As the article said...Cushing beat out Ryans and that's why Ryans is no longer in Houston. So just another look at all the theories about why Ryans was traded doesn't answer the question for me.
But whatever the reason, he is definitely better than what we had.— NancyNancy - Demeco, will play great in the middle. Kuechly will be a overrated player in the League.— Lb 54 wide 9
child51 -
The wide 9 is a 4-3 defense. You still have the 4 linemen and 3 linebackers. The defensive ends line up wider on the offensive tackles to generate a pass rush where the QB can't escape he can only step up and if it's played right the QB steps up into a defensive tackle. The line backers have a greater responsibility to fill the B gaps created with the DE lined up outside of the tackles. Run stopping Safety is important in the scheme but it's still a 4-3 defense. However, with so many teams using 3 and 4 wide receiver sets the Strong Safety has to be able to cover and run stop. A lot of instinct is needed to either come into the box or drop off into coverage. Wide 9 is not an easy scheme to master from a LB and Safety perspective. Ideally the CB is in man coverage, still trying to figure out why they had Nnamdie all over the place last year.- Uh-huh! Just sayin'...
— DJ
