Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

State   

share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
Tom "Fort" Knox
Tom "Fort" Knox
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


John Baer: Pa. pols in the zone ... the Twilight Zone

WARNING: YOU are entering another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind - an election cycle for Pennsylvania governor with multiple candidates.

Your next stop? The Political Twilight Zone.

Allow me to be your guide.

Philly's own Tom "Fort" Knox just issued a "detailed" proposal calling for - stunner! - reforms in Harrisburg.

The Democratic multimillionaire and former mayoral candidate wants to limit campaign contributions and reduce the size of the Legislature.

This he'd do by convening a "special session" of lawmakers.

(I think our lawmakers are kinda special already, don't you?)

Knox clearly is operating in a different dimension. Just think of that do-do-do-do, do-do-do-do theme song when you see his TV ads.

Campaign-finance reform and cutting the Legislature's size are great ideas offered all the time. It's just that they require the Legislature itself - while trying to do budgets and dodge indictments - to pass legislation limiting its own campaign funds, then pass legislation eliminating its jobs.

Think any governor can make our lawmakers act against their interests? Maybe you should wish real hard and clap three times.

Oh, yeah, Knox also says that officeholders should resign if running for a different office. Gee, that would be all of his potential opponents.

Hey, wait, you don't think the money thing and the resign-from-office thing have anything to do with benefiting Knox, do you?

Nah. I'm sure that any day now Democrats such as Allegheny County Chief Executive Dan Onorato, Montgomery County Commissioner Joe Hoeffel, state Auditor General Jack Wagner and Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty will race to various podiums to announce, "My God, Tom's right, I quit! It's the only honest thing to do!"

But Knox is not alone in the Twilight Zone.

Republican Tom Corbett, the state attorney general, says that he'll "turn on the power of Pennsylvania" and restore trust in government. I thought that filing criminal charges against other pols was turning on the power of Pennsylvania.

Corbett also says that, for many, "the American dream is a broken promise," but that "as governor, I'm going to change that."

Rod Serling would be proud.

Republican suburban U.S. Rep. Jim Gerlach, a former state lawmaker challenging Corbett in the primary, has a "pledge" to fix Pennsylvania's "broken" government.

No word yet on his willingness to also fix the broken dream.

Gerlach's pledge includes (and you tell me if any of this sounds familiar) limiting government, eliminating waste, creating good-paying jobs, cutting taxes and working for "quality, affordable health care."

He'd also make lawmakers "lose a day's pay" for every day a state budget is late. He doesn't mention that such action would require an act of the Legislature or how he'd get them to punish themselves, but then we've already washed that rag.

Democrat Onorato has a "vision." He sees every child, no matter where he or she lives (and you probably can finish this without reading farther), getting a "quality education, because that is the key to achieving [wait for it] the American Dream." Presumably not Corbett's broken one.

More candidates are likely. Uberconservative GOP state Rep. Sam Rohrer, of Berks County, reportedly plans to announce next week. Don't be surprised if he advocates abolishing all government.

And, look, platitudes and pandering are part of politics. Much of what you'll hear from these candidates is stuff that ought to happen.

Just be prepared to separate the promises from the possible. Demand details. Otherwise, you'll wander between light and shadow, between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. You'll awake in a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of the imagination. You'll be in Pennsylvania's Political Twilight Zone.

Send e-mail to baerj@phillynews.com.

For recent columns, go to

http://go.philly.com/baer.

Comments   
Posted 03:27 AM, 11/09/2009
Mark Chalupa
I want a Commonwealth constitutional convention to reduce the size of the legislative body. Can a governor call for one of those?
Posted 06:00 AM, 11/09/2009
FJG JR
Invoke God's commandments on them. Especially the one about sleeping with other interests.
Posted 06:27 AM, 11/09/2009
blackknight
As a recently elected official I think there does need to be some serious reform. I think that if the President is subject to term limits then so should the House and Senate. The real power of the country lies with Congress and the sooner we eliminate the lifelong politicians like Ted Kennedy (RIP) and Arlen Spector the better off we will be. Not only should there be term limits but also caps on personal spending and contributions. You have someone like John Corzine spending 30 million of his own money for a $200K job which doesn't sit right with me.
Posted 08:45 AM, 11/09/2009
abnrgr
I can't take it. So, Knox is going to get the legislature to cut their own jobs?! Don't think so. Of course, he now looks like a reformer, when in reality he has no intention of cutting anything nor does he think anyone else will, but he looks like a champion. If Knox was sincere, he would use his money and influence to pursue his goals....just not in an elected office.
Posted 11:01 AM, 11/09/2009
Adam Lang
Tom Knox is for campaign limits while dumping millions of his own dollars into his election. It's nice limiting someone else's freedom of speech while his own is protected.
Posted 01:12 PM, 11/09/2009
MikeP
Christie just got elected on exactly the same type of platform. If a candidate doesn't have a clear plan on how they'll keep their campaign promises, they aren't worth much. But campaign finance reform and term limits would change things in PA more than anything a govenor could do. Public financing would save us a boat load of money. But only the voters could make it happen by voting for candidates that support it until it happens. No govenor alone could ever make it happen.
Posted 01:53 PM, 11/09/2009
wayne michael
Just in case you missed it,Sen Argall from the Pottsville area introduced a bill to cut approx. 50 seats in the legislature by the year 2053.That's not a misprint 2053.What a joke,but then again the whole state government is a joke and a disgrace.
Posted 02:22 PM, 11/09/2009
DirtyBirds
We're the fools for even going to the polls and voting these people into office.
Posted 02:23 PM, 11/09/2009
CB
We believed Obama when he said he was the great uniter didn't we? Voters believe politicians lies all the time. Hope lies immortal. Why should it be any different with Knox?
Posted 02:26 PM, 11/09/2009
ines
here's 2 problems i'm having with the republicians - first, their idea of limiting government is pretty ironic since every decision or vote is politically motivated. The cost of health insurance increased 300% in 10 years. Without the government stepping in and saying enough is enough in 10 years we would be paying 50% of our salary on health insurance. My second problem with the republician plan is their priorities - they think that limiting malpractice will save millions. So the lawyers and the insurance companies benefit since it will make it harder to sue. What does it do for the patient who's doctor mis-diagnosed a problem. How will it help the guy who's doctor removed the wrong limb (it really happened). Loss of profits to the insurance companies was their main priority. Another laughable idea the republicians have is to allow people to cross state lines to "shop" for better rates. Really, i would laugh if it wasn't so sad. In most states 2-3 insurance companies control anywhere from 70-90% of the insured. Knowing that they will lose policyholders to each other - what's to stop the insurance companies from price fixing? All the top insurance companies will get together and agree on costs, so the poor sucker who was told she can shop around for better rates will find the rates are all the same. Again, who were republicians looking out for? All they did was insure the insurance industry that their profits were in tact.
Posted 02:27 PM, 11/09/2009
psyrus
I wanted Knox to win the mayor job. Now I am glad he didn't. His campaign finance "reform" would have the rich people being able to spend as much as they want to on an election while keeping those relying on contributions capped off at a set amount.
Posted 02:29 PM, 11/09/2009
sillybilly
I'm voting for the one that promises "a chicken in every pot"..and ain't afraid "to call the kettle" black. God Bless Pennsylvania....
Posted 02:43 PM, 11/09/2009
ines
The only way that you can insure that the politician your voting for has your best interest in mind, not a big corporations is simple. First, allow NO contributions from big corp. Second, limit the amount a person can donate. Third - give free air time equally to all candidates. Give equal newspaper space to each candidate. And last but not least - candidates should not be allowed to start campaigning 3 years before the election. A year and a half before election should give them enough time to get their message out. This will insure that not only the super rich with ties to big business but the guy who has better ideas but not enough money have an equal chance to be heard.
Posted 08:59 PM, 11/09/2009
SPENDSPEND
Maybe this guy is for real. But keep in mind that Philly has been ruled by the Dems for 50 years and they suck. While the state has been ruled by the repubs for like 30 years. If you want change don't vote for the funkers that have been there , vote for change switch the parties.
Posted 02:07 AM, 11/10/2009
dkreese
ines has it right and I am all for term limits!!!! Vote out ALL incumbents!!!!! repub or dems get them the hell out of there!!!!!
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Real Estate
  • Rentals
 
SEARCH JOBS
Spotlight Deal
Rittenhouse Square 19103
Spotlight Deal
Southwark 19147
SEARCH REAL ESTATE
Spotlight Deal
East Falls 19129
Spotlight Deal
University City 19104
SEARCH RENTALS
NEWS
Does dredging the Delaware River really matter? Plans by the Army Corps of Engineers to deepen the navigation channel from 40 to 45 feet have generated support from shipping companies and heated opposition from environmentalists.