Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
@

House vote set on debt limit

WILLIAMSBURG, Va. - House Republican leaders abruptly announced they will vote next week to temporarily extend the nation's debt limit, sharply reducing the threat that the government might default on its obligations, but leaving the party still divided as it casts about for the best way to pressure President Obama for more budget cuts.

The move Friday by Republican leaders, who have been holed up for days at an annual retreat at a snow-dusted private resort in Virginia, is a turnaround for the party. Until recently, Republicans had touted the debt ceiling as a prime point of leverage they could use in their battle with Obama over spending.

Many Republicans, particularly in the House, are still smarting from the tax hikes on the wealthy the president won in the New Year's Day fiscal-cliff deal. They are primed to fight for cuts to Medicare and other domestic programs, while seeking to divert Obama from his own priorities on gun control and immigration.

But House Speaker John A. Boehner and other members of the leadership have been warning their restive members that a fight over the debt ceiling risked harm to the economy for which Republicans likely would receive the blame. They have been looking for a way to sidestep a battle that they feared could further damage the Republicans' standing with voters.

The new plan would raise the debt limit, which currently stands at $16.4 trillion, for three months in exchange for a promise that the Democratic-controlled Senate will not miss the traditional April 15 deadline to pass its budget - a habit that has irked conservatives. Instead of staging a spending fight over the debt ceiling, Republicans would aim at one of two budget deadlines come up in March.

To compel senators to comply with the budget requirement, the plan calls for their pay to be withheld if the deadline passes without action. That provision, however, may not pass constitutional muster. The 27th Amendment provides that "no law, varying the compensation" of members of Congress can take effect until after an intervening election. The amendment was passed to prevent a Congress from voting itself a raise, but may also prohibit withholding a member's pay, lawyers and some Congress members said.

From the News Desk
Stay Connected

Even without the debate over pay, the proposal departs from past Republican demands that any increase in the debt ceiling be matched, dollar-for-dollar, with spending cuts. That standard sparked a standoff in 2011 between Boehner and Obama that brought the nation to the brink of a first-ever credit default and launched today's battles.

Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the minority leader, called the overture a "gimmick" in a statement released by her spokesman. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada was noncommittal.

White House press secretary Jay Carney said, "We are encouraged that there are signs that congressional Republicans may back off their insistence on holding our economy hostage."

Conservative leaders said they supported the plan, but some rank-and-file members remained noncommittal. Whether Boehner would have the necessary votes remained unclear. Even if the plan passes, it would leave a fundamental dilemma in place: the continuing Republican division over what spending cuts to push for and how to go about it.

Lisa Mascaro and Michael A. Memoli TRIBUNE WASHINGTON BUREAU
email
You May Also Like
Comments  (12)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:03 AM, 01/19/2013
    The GOP has an approval rating in the 20% range and the Tea Party Taliban's is around 15%. They can't stand up to the President so now they want to pick a fight with the Senate. Are these wimps the best elected officials Republicans can come up with? "We will not raise taxes", they raised taxes. "We will not negotiate on the fiscal cliff", they negotiated on the fiscal cliff.

    It's embarrassing to watch.
    wokmaster
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:37 AM, 01/19/2013
    i think its fun to watch.
    tdoc
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:08 AM, 01/19/2013
    I would have fun if the whole economy was not at stake.

    GOP destroyed the economy with Bush Depression. Now they want to destroy the recovery to win in 2014.

    GOP would have credibility in deficit issue if they did not approve 3 trillion dollar war and 8 trillion dollar millionaire tax break that created no jobs and only lead to Bush Depression.

    Job creation is first priority for American Middle Class. Get in line GOP
    Seed1
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:45 AM, 01/19/2013
    You and Woky are both idiots. The Dem controlled Senate hasn't submitted a budget in years (illegal by the way) as they want to avoid painful but necessary cuts. More importantly, the current and projected US debt load and borrowing levels are unsustainable which the CBO confirms. Next stop??? The collapse of the dollar thanks the Democrats making worse what Bush started.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:37 PM, 01/19/2013
    Professor, you are a dope. Clearly, with Republican control of the House, submiting a budget would be a waste of time. Republicans are dying for Obama to propose cuts to Social Security and Medicare so they could exploit it for political gain. Boehner could pass HIS budget proposal and know says that he wont even negotiate with Obama. Yeah, because he can't get ANYTHING done. Republicans do nothing. As if the clerical act of raising the debt limit is doing something. At this point, the two sides aren't really that far about but Boehner can't get anything done. Now that tanking the economy failed to win them the White House, we'll see some action. Will we see anything more done to address the out of control growth in the cost of health care? Not with the Republican clowns in the House. We'll make modest progress on deficits and debt. Some common sense gun control. After losing so much of the hispanic vote, Republicans will be interested in immigration reform. And we'll see some modest action on climate control. That's pretty much be it for Obama. We're already seeing Republican governors peeling off. Corbett's passing a massive bridge and highway spending bill. Christie has to change policies to avoid a projected $2 billion deficit in NJ. Republican policies just don't work.
    MikeP
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:11 AM, 01/19/2013
    The game is over, folks. Another Trillion or Two isn't going to matter.
    Konstanty
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:27 AM, 01/19/2013
    Right.

    Or is it past Republican spending and tax policy that are still in effect today? Could it be the $450 billion a year tax cuts that had no offsetting spending reductions? Could it be the 115% or 300 billion plus increase in defense spending with no revenue increase? Could it be the 2 unfunded wars of choice? Could it be the $70 billion a year unfunded Medicare drug program? Could it be the result of the increased interest we are paying on all the debt from the above? Could it be the result of loss of revenue brought on by the great recession brought by the corporate banks and Wall Street? You know, loss revenue caused by shipping US jobs overseas by Corporate America and companies like Bain Capital? Hmmm...

    The GOP has ZERO credibility on this issue.
    wokmaster
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:49 AM, 01/19/2013
    Actually the ONLY people with any credibility here is the Tea Party. But hey the Dems want keep spending more that the country takes is risking the collapse of the dollar the I guess thats their prerogative. CBO confirms the US is spending over $1 Trillion more per year than it makes...that my friends is UNSUSTAINABLE.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:35 AM, 01/19/2013
    The disaster dates back 30 years -- that's how long Republicans have been pushing "unfunded tax cuts", which ran up $12 trillion of the current debt.

    Bill Clinton was the only president to balance the budget & pay down debt.

    This Administration has proposed sensible deficit-reduction measures with ratios of 3:1 spending cuts to revenue increase, and asked about ratios as high as 4:1, 6:1 -- all of which were rejected out-of-hand by House Republicans.

    So which party is it, that you are saying was a fiscal disaster?

    Crawl back under your rock, enough lies from the ignorant professor1982 today. You're a "professor" the same as Fox is "news".
    wokmaster
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:07 AM, 01/19/2013
    The republicans have a rationing problem. They have cut taxes for so long, and fought so many unfunded wars, for so long, they forgot that when you take away revenue, you are forcing the US Treasury to print money or borrow money. You can not ration the economy into prosperity by perpetually pledging to cut taxes, in boom times and recessions and then lie about "spending money beyond our means". Off course it is beyond our means, you destroyed the means of funding with tax cuts, tax loopholes, tax havens and tax incentives to the point where most corporations pay ZERO CORPORATE TAXES!!! Taxes need to be raised by the levels of at least the 1970's, because that is spending basis before republicans decided to deliberately ration the money supply.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:13 PM, 01/19/2013
    we handout 50 billion a day anyway, what is another say 200 trillon ?
    eddiot
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:08 PM, 01/19/2013
    Just make it a quadrillion dollars in debt, and call it a day.
    Mr. Smith