Saturday, April 6, 2013
Saturday, April 6, 2013
@

Conn. gun law seen as model for nation

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy at the law-signing ceremony with parents of Sandy Hook shooting victims. (Steven Senne / AP)
Gov. Dannel P. Malloy at the law-signing ceremony with parents of Sandy Hook shooting victims. (Steven Senne / AP)
Story Highlights
  • Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed into law sweeping new restrictions on weapons Thursday.
  • He signed the bill into law giving Connecticut some of the toughest gun-control laws in the country.
  • Malloy hoped the new law would spur action in Washington.

HARTFORD, Conn. - Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed into law sweeping new restrictions on weapons and large-capacity ammunition magazines Thursday in response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, a bipartisan deal that gun-control proponents hope will spark action in Washington and state legislatures across the country.

Just four months ago, the governor broke the news to horrified parents that their children had been slaughtered in the Newtown school. On Thursday, four of those parents joined him as he signed the bill into law during a somber ceremony at the state Capitol, his act giving Connecticut some of the toughest gun-control laws in the country.

Malloy hugged each of the parents and gave them a pen he used to sign the bill.

"We have come together," he said, "in a way that relatively few places in our nation have demonstrated an ability to do."

Since the Dec. 14 shooting in which 20 children and six educators were killed, some of their family members have become gun-control advocates, pressing for both tougher state and federal laws.

"This is a path I never thought my life would take. But working to save the lives of others is one way that I can honor Dylan's life," said Nicole Hockley, referring to her 6-year-old son who was killed at Sandy Hook. "We want Newtown to be known not for our tragedy, but for transformation."

From the News Desk
Stay Connected

Malloy said he has become friends with some of the parents and promised to keep working with them to enact further law changes that address gun violence.

Malloy and gun-control advocates said they hoped the new law, crafted by legislative leaders from both parties during several weeks of negotiations, coupled with President Obama's planned visit to the state Monday, would spur action in Washington.

In an interview on Fox News, NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre criticized the legislation.

"The problem with what Connecticut did," he said, "is the criminals, the drug dealers, the people that are going to do horror and terror, they aren't going to cooperate."

At the stroke of Malloy's pen on Thursday, the new law added more than 100 firearms to the state's assault weapons ban, effective immediately.

The new law also immediately bans the sale of magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. People who purchased those guns and magazines before midnight Wednesday would be allowed to keep them, so long as they're registered with the state police before Jan. 1. Required background checks for private gun sales also take effect.

Other parts of the new law that take effect over the coming year include a ban on armor-piercing bullets, establishment of a deadly weapon offender registry, expansion of circumstances when a person's mental-health history disqualifies them from holding a gun permit, mandatory reporting of voluntary hospital commitments, doubled penalties for gun trafficking and other firearms violations, and $1 million to fund the statewide firearms-trafficking task force.

Susan Haigh Associated Press
email
You May Also Like
Comments  (43)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:44 AM, 04/05/2013
    Gun control will have no more affect then banning 48ozers (sodas) from people drinking more then 48ozers. Mental illness, enforcing existing laws;, this is smoke and mirrows political style to capitalize on a tragic, horrible, event perpetrated by an insane person.

    Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? Not the Heritage Foundation for sure. http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf

    Regardless of how you feel about gun control in general, there is no correlation between gun control strictness and mass murder. Not an NRA publication. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/reading-between-the-headlines/201207/mass-murders-are-the-rise

    Mass Shootings: Maybe What We Need Is a Better Mental-Health Not a Tea Party article. Policyhttp://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/jared-loughner-mass-shootings-mental-illness

    Sandy Hook: Gun control wouldn't have stopped it
    Read more: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/conscience-conservative/2012/dec/16/why-gun-control-wouldnt-have-prevented-connecticut/#ixzz2Pa39vz00
    http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/conscience-conservative/2012/dec/16/why-gun-control-wouldnt-have-prevented-connecticut/
    STEPHEN1988
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:47 AM, 04/05/2013
    LIBERAL AGENDA ALERT!!!

    Adam Lanza STOLE his weapons and killed the law abiding owner.

    THESE LAWS WOULD NOT HAVE STOPPED LANZA.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:52 AM, 04/05/2013
    This is a stupid law. Some guy puts bullets deep into the brains of some (20) children and right away the Democrats want to do something. Can't they see that doing nothing is the way to go? The GOP & NRA have it right. Doing nothing is the way to go.

    If something has to be done, get more guns.

    After all, when you get cancer isn't more cancer the answer?
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:30 AM, 04/05/2013
    LoL...wannabe GOPeer_er:

    Where is anything to address the needs of those with mental health issues?

    How would have this law stopped Lanza who stole the guns in the first place?

    GOP/NRA have proposed what many believe is the ONLY effective way to deal with rare crimes such as this...BUT FUNNY HOW THE DEMOCRATS ARE ALL THE SUDDEN TO CHEAP TO WANT TO FUND IT.

    Hypocrites.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:04 AM, 04/05/2013
    By the looks of all Professor/Taxmans post this morning, the old guys blood pressure must be soaring.

    You can almost see his red face as he pounds the keys defending his stupid gun ideas.

    It's sad, the professorMomma needs serious help.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:53 AM, 04/05/2013
    Millions of Americans are mad, not just the professor.



    Charlie Cheese Steak
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:11 AM, 04/05/2013
    First of all, he's obviously not an actual professor. It's just his screen name. Secondly, we have about 215 million people in this country so millions doesn't mean anything. Case in point: millions of Americans believe that the media or government adds "mind-controlling technology" to television broadcast signals.
    wokmaster
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:38 AM, 04/05/2013
    Notice how people who dissent against the government are painted as crazy, stupid, dangerous, don't care about kids, and according to wokmaster are "mind controlled by their TVs."

    That is by design.

    I support responsibility, accountability, freedom and the Constitution.

    Ya know that guns don't pull their own triggers.

    Infringement on my civil rights because of a few random acts of the mentally ill and criminals isn't how American works.

    Obama and friends 9wokmasters of the world) will not stop. They will not yield until only the government and police have all the guns.

    The current regime in power is the antithesis of liberalism and it is the epitome of totalitarianism.

    My advise to freedom loving Americans is to load up and when push becomes shove, act like an American.

    You'll know hat to do.
    Charlie Cheese Steak
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:02 AM, 04/05/2013
    Funny thing to note: dissent was the cool thing to do when Bush was in office. Now it makes you an 'evil pawn' or a racist.
    DeltaV
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:24 AM, 04/05/2013
    A model for what? A totalitarian government?. Once again, all of the mass killers have been mentally ill. We have no place for these people tobe taken for treatment or treatment and confinement. Our grandparents and other before us knew that some people are not fit be among the public. We have to understand that some people are just plain nuts and should be attended to for their safety and for the publics safety. These laws will do not anything to change what is happening.
    Wildman Bill
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:44 AM, 04/05/2013
    It says a lot about the state of the country when the biggest call after a disaster is for someone else to do something. People used to be capable of taking care of themselves; the words "ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country" meant something.

    Now, people demand someone else take the action to keep them safe. "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Benjamin Franklin.
    DeltaV
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:45 AM, 04/05/2013
    LoL...Connecticut's law will be defeated in Court and its only a matter of time. Moreover, this law will cost residents of Connecticut hundreds of millions in tax dollars in legal fees and implementation only to lose in the end.

    BTW, polls in CT show most of the residents oppose this law...just like in NY where Cumo shoved that law down the states throat.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:16 AM, 04/05/2013
    Thank You Lawmakers of Connecticut! The new law will set the standard for the rest of the country. Since 60-80% of all those asked have wished for the laws that were just passed. Its time that the 60-80% of the country stands up towards the 5% of the right wing anti gun control minority. Its time for those of us to contact our local lawmakers and tell them this is what we want and need for our own state!!!!!!! We the majority will no longer stand for the 5% telling us whats good for us concerning guns!!! We the majority will not stand by anymore!!! We have the law on the books now in Conn! WE NOW WANT THE SAME IN PA AND ACROSS THE NATION. We the majority will determine the outcome of gun control laws not the 5% on the right. Our voices have been heard and will continue to be heard across the nation!!!!
    gibby58
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:41 AM, 04/05/2013
    Poor Gibby - Enjoy.

    "Nations with stringent anti-gun laws generally have substantially higher murder rates than those that do not. The study found that the nine European nations with the lowest rates of gun ownership (5,000 or fewer guns per 100,000 population) have a combined murder rate three times higher than that of the nine nations with the highest rates of gun ownership (at least 15,000 guns per 100,000 population)."


    Not happening in PA.

    PS Sandy Hook was a "Gun Free Zone"...how'd that ban on guns work out for those 26 dead people???

    Right.

    http://theacru.org/acru/harvard_study_gun_control_is_counterproductive/

    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:47 AM, 04/05/2013
    The thing is, we're not telling you 'what is good for you'. We just want to be left alone.

    And you have no where near 60-80%, especially in PA.
    DeltaV


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3