Friday, April 5, 2013
Friday, April 5, 2013
@

City considers hiking liquor-drink tax to 15 percent

City Council President Darrell Clarke with Avenue North in the background. Clarke has pledged support for increasing the “liquor-by-the-drink” tax.<br />
RON TARVER / Staff Photographer
City Council President Darrell Clarke with Avenue North in the background. Clarke has pledged support for increasing the “liquor-by-the-drink” tax.
Story Highlights
  • The possibility of increasing the "liquor-by-the-drink" tax seems to be gaining traction on both sides.
  • City Council President Darrell Clarke has pledged support for increasing the tax.
  • Nutter said increasing the tax by half (to 15 percent per drink) is an option his administration is considering.

NEED A REASON to drink? How about improving the futures of Philadelphia's schoolkids?

Mayor Nutter and City Council are rarely on the same page these days, but the possibility of increasing the "liquor-by-the-drink" tax to help pay for the School Reform Commission's request for $60 million seems to be gaining traction on both sides.

City Council President Darrell Clarke has pledged support for increasing the tax, which now adds 10 percent to your bar tab (on top of the sales tax) and sends it to the schools.

The possibility of increasing the tax by half (to 15 percent per drink) has been floated.

In 1994, then-Councilman Nutter voted in favor of creating the tax, which now brings in more than $45 million per year.

"President Clarke and I have talked about that and I am certainly interested in that kind of proposal, but my track record on that one is pretty clear," Nutter said. The 1994 bill "was a tough vote for a lot of folks but I thought it was the right thing to do then and it's certainly something that we should explore now."

Clarke spokeswoman Jane Roh wrote in an email that the Council president "supports increasing this tax to bolster an annualized revenue stream for the schools."

From the News Desk
Stay Connected

Pat Conway, president of the Pennsylvania Restaurant and Lodging Association, said that while businesses don't like the tax, it's the customers who usually absorb its cost.

"It would be a tough pill to swallow for restaurants and taverns and for the entire hospitality industry, but it's actually more of a consumer issue," Conway said.

Increasing the tax is no silver-bullet cocktail shaker for fully funding the schools' request, so Council and the mayor would have to find money in other places to reach the $60 million the schools say they need to plug their enormous budget gap.

Nutter supports funding the request but has been elusive as to how he wants to get that done. On Thursday he addressed criticism that his administration hasn't yet presented a plan, saying he wants to first develop one with Council.

"We don't have a plan today and we certainly don't have all the answers today, and we don't have to have a plan and all the answers today. Our budget process, at least under the charter, is completed by the end of May," he said.

Some in Council, including Clarke, have not committed to providing the full $60 million, arguing that after two years of city property-tax hikes for the schools, it's Harrisburg's turn.

Nutter, however, said Thursday that he thinks Philly needs to show its commitment first to get more money out of the state.

"It would put us at that much worse of a situation from a discussion or negotiation standpoint to somehow seek additional funding from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania . . . while some might suggest that the city would not be putting dollars on the table," he said. "I have to reject that kind of strategy."

CORRECTION: Due to an editing error, an earlier version of this story erroneously stated that Mayor Nutter supports increasing the liquor tax from 10 percent to 15 percent. Nutter said he wanted to discuss a possible increase but did not specify a rate.


On Twitter: @SeanWalshDN

Blog: PhillyClout.com

SEAN COLLINS WALSH Daily News Staff Writer walshSE@phillynews.com, 215-854-4172
email
You May Also Like
Comments  (60)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:54 AM, 04/05/2013
    Until you fix how the PSD spend it's money,any additional taxes will just feed the problem and not force the dostrict to learn how to manage the money it has properly. Stop punishing the people of Philadelphia with an ever increasing number of taxes.
    Wildman Bill
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:36 PM, 04/05/2013
    Legalize weed and fund education. Case closed

  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:04 AM, 04/05/2013
    Tax and spend, tax and spend.
    aviator
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:41 AM, 04/05/2013
    yet another reason to avoid this dump of a city
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:22 AM, 04/05/2013
    There is fat elsewhere in this city government and a pension system named DROP being abused never intended for anyone but people who actually risk their lives daily for the citizens-Police and Firemen. When some fat scum greedy politicians and their drones got their hands onto that this citys finances were doomed. People retiring for a day and coming back to another pension entitlement too, scumbags
    Steelmanpa
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:39 AM, 04/05/2013
    Did you know in PA 18% of the price paid for alcohol STILL goes to the tax for rebuilding Johnstown after the 1890 flood?!?

    was 123 yrs ago and were STILL paying that tax!

    Amazing.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:08 PM, 04/05/2013
    Not quite. It can be confusing, since Johnstown seems to be destroyed by a flood every few years, but the liquor tax was in response to the 1936 flood, not the 1889 flood that also destroyed the town.
    Think about it for a minute; what happened to all alcohol sales, nation wide, in between those two floods that would make a liquor tax imposed in 1889 impossible to collect? Prohibition.
    77 years is still a long time to have a "temporary" tax on the books, but the money has gone to the general fund since the 1940's, just like every other state in the country except New Hampshire.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:47 AM, 04/05/2013
    Going to see a rise in illegal bars ooops I mean undocumented bars
    callitlikeiseethem
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:56 AM, 04/05/2013
    Reduce Nutter's staff.
    blipster
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:09 AM, 04/05/2013
    Why fix the problem of overspending when we can just raise another tax??
    Jaytee1
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:29 PM, 04/05/2013
    Because theyre democrats. Hello?
    tr88
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:14 AM, 04/05/2013
    Surprise! More taxes. At what point does city council look at eliminating DROP.
    TEMPLE55
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:40 AM, 04/05/2013
    The sad thing that this latest tranche of $60 million isn't going to do one thing to help the school system. It will just go down the same drain as the other billions spent on "education" in a system that continues to produce illiterates and where the "teachers" unions refuse any type of accountability. We keep thinking that, at some point, the democrats are going to run out of things to tax, but they never seem to do.
    TonyMarino
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:41 AM, 04/05/2013
    Hey, c'mon..Knudsen is in charge now. Let 'em loose and let's see how much he'll rake in from tax deadbeats. Why this "nibble-nibble" approach to keep raising money for the SDP? They're top heavy, the overpaid folks need to be cleaned out, etc. The theft and waste needs to be corraled and eliminated. Giving law firms millions of dollars (for what??)is just the "built in" payola. Let's "gut" 440 of the drones and patronage leeches first. By the way--where is Nunery? Still drawing a hefty salary? Gone? Laying low? I still want resolution to the Archie/Evans/Nunery ethics investigation that Nutter promised. What's the status, Nutter? Just keep raising taxes and giving money to the SDP? Wrong..The State says--"See--they have plenty of options to keep pumping up the funding to throw into the payoff toilet". Stop the stupidity!
    oblekr
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:43 AM, 04/05/2013
    One other thought..Where's the $133 Million dollar City budget surplus we had in Fiscal 2012? Not that I'd give that to the SDP. I just want an answer to where that money is..plus the millions in surpluses from the earlier years. Where is it? Does anybody know?
    oblekr


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5