Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

  

share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment
RELATED STORIES
Other News
 
Bacon Bros. set Dec. 5 concert to raise money for Mummers
 
Phils' Utley wins 4th slugger award
 
These two authors say: Chuck the chardonnay
 
CDC: 22 million have fallen ill with H1N1
 
Census worker a suicide?


Pa. drops plans for Willow Grove

Rendell: Without U.S. funds, emergency, defense hub too costly.

In an abrupt reversal, Gov. Rendell yesterday abandoned plans to convert the soon-to-close Willow Grove Naval Air Station into a state-administered emergency and defense hub.

Rendell wrote to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates that because the military had declined to assign a flying mission to the Pennsylvania Air National Guard's 111th Fighter Wing at the base, the state could not justify spending millions of dollars to configure the airfield as a state-federal facility.

"The continued and increasing expenditures of scarce state resources on this project made no sense as long as the federal government failed to commit to being a full partner in this effort," Rendell wrote to Gates.

The decision likely ends a fight that Rendell began after Willow Grove turned up on the Defense Department's list of recommended base closings in 2005. Rather than see the 1,100-acre base shut down, Rendell proposed converting it into a nexus for the region's homeland security and other government needs, with outside agencies paying rent to the state to cover expenses.

Although the facility was expected to become fiscally self-sufficient eventually, the state estimated that it would have to spend up to $19 million on capital improvements and first-year operating costs, a sum Rendell now has called "an undue fiscal burden" during lean times.

"The concept is unsustainable without a corresponding federal pledge to support the installation and undertake military flights there," Rendell said in a statement.

Defense officials did not respond to calls for comment.

Although Rendell expressed hope that the base would house a proposed regional National Emergency Center, that prospect is uncertain. A House bill to create six such centers has not reached the committee level. Its only Pennsylvania cosponsor, Republican Rep. Jim Gerlach, did not return a call for comment.

State officials said they expected the Willow Grove Naval Air Station to be turned over to a redevelopment committee to handle its conversion to partial civilian use.

The committee is largely locally controlled. Thus, area residents who worried that the state-federal installation - and especially the private-sector businesses housed on it - would create incessant plane traffic probably will be restricting airstrip use themselves, officials said.

"This gives us more protection to making sure it's not used as a civilian airport," State Sen. Stewart J. Greenleaf (R., Montgomery) said.

About 110 acres of the base will continue to house Pennsylvania Air and Army National Guard units and an Army Reserve installation. But use of the military airstrip will end when the base's last A-10 jet fighters depart next summer.

The Navy base employs about 1,000 workers daily, and the post-shutdown units stationed there will put about 500 workers on site during weekdays, said Joan Nissley, spokeswoman for the state Department of Military and Veterans Affairs.

In April 2008, Rendell asked then-Secretary of the Navy Donald C. Winter to let the state use "all lands and facilities" at Willow Grove to "save the base as an important military installation."

Yesterday, in reversing the request, Rendell wrote to Gates that he hoped to maintain a "robust military enclave" even without the joint installation he had envisioned.

"It was a great idea," State Rep. Rick Taylor (D., Montgomery) said. "However, it succumbed to the economic realities that unless the federal government partnered, the funds would not be there. We wanted a flying mission for the 111th Fighter Wing out of there, and that's not in the cards."

 


Contact staff writer Derrick Nunnally at 610-313-8212 or dnunnally@phillynews.com.

Comments   
Posted 04:05 AM, 11/13/2009
ktappe
Can someone explain to me why residents who have no problem with very noisy military jets somehow have a problem with much quieter civilian aircraft using the facility? I think using Willow Grove as a regional airport would be a great idea. It could compete with PHL, ACY, RDG ILG, and ABE. Or are locals that much against helping their local economy?
Posted 04:56 AM, 11/13/2009
jtap1981
ktappe - agreed
Posted 05:39 AM, 11/13/2009
Shabba Rommel
ktappe - A10s are not noisy...infact, those flying buses (airliners) are much noisier and, with their longer approaches and departures, would be more noice pollution than you would expect. Also with Philly's NE airport already struggling, why would the state want to dilute airtraffic even more? With the economy where it is, people are not traveling like they used to.
Posted 06:37 AM, 11/13/2009
phillyfreak
Hundreds of full-time air national guardsman will be left without a full time job because of this. support the troop? not if it cost money apparently. And the A10s are very quiet compared to most commercial airliners.
Posted 07:36 AM, 11/13/2009
lulu
Get the facts straight. From the beginning, the federal government closed down this base and said we have no use for it. Rendell tried to act like if you didn't support his idea for the base, you were turning your back on the military. No, the government had already done this. Rendell just wanted to get paid and turn Horsham into a commercial airport, using a military bend as a fog screen. Also, the military planes are quiet and have strict flying curfews. Nothing is louder than a commerical airport and the air traffic would increase tenfold with no curfews. Also, Horsham is extremely populated and a commercial airport would be very dangerous - local schools are in danger zones if a plane were to crash during landing or take off, when most incidents occur. Because of this, the school district sent letters home to all families asking them to not support a civilian/commercial airport. We don't want it and thanfully, we won't get it. Now the future of the Willow Grove airbase is out of Rendell's hands, where it never belonged.
Posted 07:47 AM, 11/13/2009
PeterMyers
What you don't understand about the noise level is that the military aircraft fly very infrequently, while civilian aircraft - if commercial - do. I have lived next to the base for 40 years, and think that there is limited practacality towards it being a smaller commercial airport, as far as demand is concerned.
Posted 08:35 AM, 11/13/2009
everydayguy
Rendell can't find $19m over a couple of years for the base but can suddenly drum up $7m to pay off a crooked union? Go figure.
Posted 08:37 AM, 11/13/2009
annec
ktappe-absolutely. Good idea residents and representatives lets put more people out of work in this economy. Has anyone ever seen the size of those C-130's they're huge, oh but thats okay it military not a private sector. How stupid are these people and I don't live that far from the air base (5-6 miles). I see those planes all the time, doesn't bother me. I would like to know what came first the chicken or the egg, ie how long has that base been there and when was it established, I am willing to bet a whole hecka of lot longer than a lot of those homes in the surrounding areas. What's next, I guess all the people that bought the McMansions in Chester County will be looking to run the mushrooms farmers out of town, because of the smells.
Posted 08:42 AM, 11/13/2009
kelprod1
Shut it down, have the feds auction off half of the property and donate the rest to the local township. Enough of this already....
Posted 09:26 AM, 11/13/2009
phillyfreak
yeah kelprod1 is right. fire the full time employees at the base who are mostly iraq/afghan vets. thats a good way to support them. why not just spit on them while you're at it? *shakes head*
Posted 09:35 AM, 11/13/2009
kelprod1
phillyfreak...if there is no need for those employees, then they should be transferred to a place where there is a need for them. If there is no need for them at all, then yes, cut them loose. It is not the role of government to be an employer, simply for the sake of providing employment. Willow Grove could be shut down tomorrow and would have zero impact on our national defense. Considering we as a people just set a new record for deficit spending in the month of October, the feds should be looking at ways to slash expenses and raise revenue....considering Willow Grove has no use whatsoever from a defense standpoint, auctioning off the property and placing the money in our national piggy bank is a wise idea.
Posted 09:42 AM, 11/13/2009
phillyz
Do I smell another potential casino site?
Posted 09:45 AM, 11/13/2009
Fred Glick
How about doing what New York, LA, Chicago, San Francisco, Dallas, Miami and other world class American cities do in order to bring jobs and commerce in, make WG a 2nd Internal airport. We could have Jet Blue, Virgin America, Virgin Atlantic along with legacy airlines come in and lower the overall cost of transportation to and from the City of Brotherly Love!
Posted 09:53 AM, 11/13/2009
borncynic
The roads in the area could not handle the traffic of a full fledged commercial airport. Leaving the land for local control will leave a lot of campaign contributors, er, developers very happy.
Posted 09:53 AM, 11/13/2009
borncynic
The roads in the area could not handle the traffic of a full fledged commercial airport. Leaving the land for local control will leave a lot of campaign contributors, er, developers very happy.
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Real Estate
  • Rentals
 
SEARCH JOBS
Spotlight Deal
Chestnut Hill 19118
Spotlight Deal
Center City 19107
SEARCH REAL ESTATE
Spotlight Deal
Center City 19102
Spotlight Deal
East Falls 19129
SEARCH RENTALS