Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Selling Shell

Gov. Corbett has two weeks to sell his Shell deal to the Legislature as part of a new state budget. There are better ways to do so than he's tried so far.

Selling Shell


Despite Gov. Corbett's horrible start on selling his Shell deal to lawmakers and voters, there's a better-than-even chance he can get it done as part of a new state budget due July 1.

Corbett and the administration erred badly by not owning the proposal to grant Shell $1.7 billion worth of incentives to build a huge processing plant in Western PA.

The story broke as a corporate giveaway at a time the guv wants to cut funds for education, social services and more; it underscored his reputation for taking political contributions from energy companies (especially natural gas) then declining to tax them.

Even if there were confidentiality issues with Shell because of simultaneous plant-siting negotiations with other states, Corbett could have/should have rolled out the plan as a jobs project in process, using whatever details he could to start selling it.

More coverage
Shell tax breaks would pay off for Pennsylvania

Plus, even after the story was reported by the online news service and spread quickly as a gift to a corporate energy giant from a pro-business Republican, administration response was weak and unconvincing.

But now, with the budget deadline in sight, there is at least some effort to explain benefits of the proposal.

State Labor & Industry Secty. Julia Hearthway, for example, makes a case in Monday's Inky.

And the overall argument isn't bad: the tax credit (which, presumably needs to be locked in before Shell starts construction of the $4 billion plant) doesn't take effect for five years; denying it won't free up more money for this year's budget (or the next several) and could drive Shell to another state such as Ohio or West Virginia; the deal could mean tens of thousands of construction and manufacturing jobs, and the taxes from workers and businesses that spin off the project would in the long run outweigh the state's investment.

If Corbett lost (or looses) this potential project, media would excoriate him for laziness, ineptitude and short-sightedness. He already earned such hits for his initial handling of the Shell deal. Now he has a chance to rescue it -- and his woeful communications efforts.





Daily News Political Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
John Baer has been covering politics and government for the Daily News since 1987. The National Journal in 2002 called Baer one of the country's top 10 political journalists outside Washington, saying Baer has, "the ability to take the skin off a politician without making it hurt too much." E-mail John at

John is the author of the book "On The Front Lines of Pennsylvania Politics: Twenty-Five Years of Keystone Reporting" (The History Press, 2012). Reach John at

John Baer Daily News Political Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter