Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
@

America's Most Loathed Institution Celebrates 100th Birthday

Original 1040 from 1913
Original 1040 from 1913
Story Highlights
  • February 3 was the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 16th Amendment.
  • Its ratification was an effort to make sure more higher-income people paid taxes.
  • By the time President Taft took office in 1909, the public outcry grew over a tax system that undertaxed the rich and overtaxed the poor.
Original 1040 from 1913 Gallery: America's Most Loathed Institution Celebrates 100th Birthday

Imagine a world with income tax; if you were an American citizen before 1913, with a few exceptions you didn’t have to deal with an April deadline and the IRS. Today, no one really knows how big the tax code is.

February 3 was the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 16th Amendment. Its champion was President William Howard Taft, and its ratification was an effort to make sure more higher-income people paid taxes, and that the government wasn’t wholly dependent on tariffs and taxes on goods.

It wasn’t the first national income tax that was enacted. In fact, it was the third. But this third attempt had the power of constitutional amendment behind it, and it's still in force today.

The Founding Fathers and the generation of leaders that followed them weren’t big on the idea of an income tax. Tariffs and sales taxes helped fund the federal government in the early days.

But the financial needs of the Civil War led to the first national income tax.

The Civil War income tax instituted by the Union was one of several financing tools it used against the Confederacy. The government also issued bonds and used excise taxes.

The Confederacy also had its own version of an income tax, too, which wasn’t as effective.

The Union’s income tax went away during the period of Reconstruction, with the idea of an income tax returning two decades later.

Author John Steele Gordon wrote a nice, short history of the income tax in 2011 for The Wall Street Journal, beginning with the Civil War and concluding with the 14th Amendment and its immediate aftermath.

From the News Desk
Stay Connected

Steele says the combination of a huge government surplus and a heavy tax burden on consumers led President Grover Cleveland’s administration to pass a second income tax law in 1894.

“The new tax, however, was very different from the Civil War income tax, which had exempted only the poor. The new one hit only the rich, imposing a 2 percent tax on incomes above $4,000. Less than 1 percent of American households in 1894 met that income threshold,” said Steele.

The second income tax law was soon overturned by the Supreme Court in the 1895 decision of Pollack v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust.

In a 5-4 decision, the court said the Cleveland income tax was a direct tax that violated a constitutional provision because it taxed interest, dividends, and rent. That act violatedArticle 1, Section 2 of the Constitution, which required such taxes to be imposed in proportion to states’ population.

By the time President Taft took office in 1909, the public outcry grew over a tax system that undertaxed the rich and overtaxed the poor.

In June 1909, Taft sent a letter to Congress to lobby for the 16th Amendment. He explained that part of the Pollack decision allowed the federal government to levy a corporate income tax as an excise tax.

“The decision in the Pollock case left power in the National Government to levy an excise tax, which accomplishes the same purpose as a corporation income tax and is free from certain objections urged to the proposed income tax measure,” he said.

The president then defined a basic two-tax system where income taxes were collected from citizens and businesses. He also understood that the amendment wouldn’t allow the Supreme Court to overturn a personal income tax based on the Pollack decision.

“I recommend, then, first, the adoption of a joint resolution by two-thirds of both Houses, proposing to the States an amendment to the Constitution granting to the Federal Government the right to levy and collect an income tax without apportionment among the several States according to population; and, second, the enactment, as part of the pending revenue measure, either as a substitute for, or in addition to, the inheritance tax, of an excise tax upon all corporations, measured by 2 percent of their net income,” Taft said.

Congress passed its resolution about the 16th Amendment a month later, but the amendment wasn’t ratified until early 1913, when Delaware became the 36th state to approve it.

Incoming president Woodrow Wilson pushed for the Revenue Act of 1913, which included the income tax along with changes in tariffs.

The first 1040 form appeared in 1914. It was three pages long. The first income tax act after the 16th Amendment was 14 pages long, and the federal tax code was about 400 pages long.

Today, one estimate puts the federal tax code at more than 70,000 pages. An IRS report from 2008 said that no one really knew how big the current tax code is, and it estimated the code at 3.7 million words.

Bomboy is editor-in-chief of the National Constitution Center.

Follow the Constitution Center on Twitter @ConstitutionCtr

Scott Bomboy CONSTITUTION DAILY
email
You May Also Like
Comments  (8)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:29 PM, 02/04/2013
    easy to fix; two tax tiers plus a consumption tax.
    palmyra21
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:48 PM, 02/04/2013
    Some fine day, some brilliant politician will find a way to simplify our tax system down to a one page postcard. We'll save hundreds of billions wasted on needless regulation, bureaucracy, paper pushers, and special tax deals for the rich. Yup, someday, but not in my lifetime...
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:08 PM, 02/04/2013
    Never happen. You know how many bureaucrats are employed by the IRS?
    DeltaV
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:58 PM, 02/04/2013
    I thought America's most loathed institution was the Republican Party.
    Jeff West
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:02 PM, 02/04/2013
    I would like to see them bring back the tax deduction for interest paid on car loans. Just as its elimination in the 80s almost destroyed the auto industry, bringing it back should have a positive effect on the economy. You can even raise tax rates and most in the lower tax brackets would still benefit.
    towman
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:11 PM, 02/04/2013
    The article should have been titled, 100 years and Americans still don't realize they are legally being robbed!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dmPchuXIXQ

    "I am a Most un-Happy Man, I have Unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." - Woodrow Wilson after signing the income tax bill.
    PHAN12345
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:11 PM, 02/04/2013
    Accountants, tax lawyers, H&R Block, and a host of mom&pop tax preparers would be devastated, not to mention the IRS bloodsuckers, if the tax code was simplified.
    Jean Valjean
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:57 PM, 02/04/2013
    How can you simplify the Tax Code when we hace a Congress in Washington whose job consists of making new laws? In order to keep their jobs, our wise lawmakers will go on adding laws on top of laws to the U.S. Tax Code until nobody will know how big it really is. Wait a minute! We already passed that point!
    DonQ