PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
comments
5
options
 
Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Gov. Rendell and the Pennsylvania General Assembly may have given natural-gas drillers in the state's Marcellus Shale a free ride, suspending a threatened tax, in hopes of encouraging jobs.

But activist investors say they're trying to pick up the slack. A Boston-based coalition of environmentally-oriented investors, including the New York State Common Fund and a lot of small, specialized, and Christian investment groups, said yesterday they'll use their shares in ExxonMobil Corp. and other publicly-traded Marcellus drillers to ask corporate officers to  "increase transparency" about chemical and wastewater used in drilling, and to use less less-polluting methods, during the current shareholder proxy and annual-meeting season.

Among the coalition members are the Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia, a group of around 500 teachers and nurses based in Aston.  Why?: I asked Sister Nora Nash, their Director of Corporate and Social Responsibility.

"I read, in the Philadelphia Inquirer, about what's happening in our state," she told me, slowly and quietly. "I'm really appalled by the fact the State of Pennsylvania has allowed so many gas drilling companies to come into this state and exploit the Marcellus Shale before we have an opporutnity to fully understand what's going on. We're really concerned about the impact on health and on drinking water."

It's not like they're drilling in Aston. But the sisters "are concerned citizens. Our motherhouse is located in this State."  So what do the sisters want? "We signed a resolution asking Chesapeake Energy to provide transparency around the impact of their operations and the risks associated with gas drilling." They're waiting to hear if the Securities and Exchange Commission will put the resolution on this year's proxy ballot.

"I also wrote to the Marathon Oil Co. They did respond, but they still didn't give us information on what chemicals they were using in order to produce the (rock-) fracturing fluids" used in Marcellus drilling. Yes, she's read Marathon's annual report. "It does not provide the level of public disclosure and transparency" that would protect the public, Sister told me.

Did she call Aston's State Sen., Dominic Pileggi, who's also top dog in the State Senate? His brother's a priest, after all. "I know. He tells me these are all small companies and they're trying to help small business. But that's not satisfactory. There are actually very large companies drilling here. This is a serious concern."
 

Posted by Joseph N. DiStefano @ 5:35 PM  Permalink | 5 comments
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:57 PM, 01/26/2010
    Gee, I thought we prayed for PA to have some natural resources that could help our economy since we don't have anything else to provide jobs.
    PaulDeon
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:21 PM, 01/26/2010
    I would check yourself - 'we don't have anything else to provide jobs.' What kind of statement is that? Agriculture is one of if not the biggest employer in PA, hunting and environmental tourism also employ 10s of thousands of people. I could go on and on. I support drilling the Marcellus Shale - but we don't want to allow an environmental disaster - there should be a little more oversight.
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:40 PM, 01/26/2010
    WV, OH and NY all tax gas extracted from the Marcellus Shale. PA is the only state that does not, yet we are being told that we'd be at a competitive disadvantage if we did even though more of it sits under us than anyone else. I say tax it at or just under the price that the other states do. I would also like to see which PA Pols the gas/oil companies have bought.
    Moe_Syzlak
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:43 PM, 07/14/2010
    Note well: if you make any comment that implies that nuns shouldn't run corporate America based on their limited knowledge and (literally) parochial mindset, it will be removed. No wonder this "newspaper' is insolvent.
    zipman


5 comments