Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
@

Kevin Riordan: Home, suite home: Time for a little zoning flexibility

The Alessios hope to sell their Cherry Hill home, but it hasa "mother-in-law suite" now called illegal.
KEVIN RIORDAN / Staff
The Alessios hope to sell their Cherry Hill home, but it hasa "mother-in-law suite" now called illegal.
Story Highlights
  • Tom and Rita Alessio want to sell their house that they added an addition on for the daughter.
  • The single-story backyard extension for which they obtained municipal approvals is considered illegal because it has a full kitchen.
  • The township wants to prevent single-family homes from conversion into duplexes or rental apartments
More coverage
  • New I-95 project at Girard Avenue promises new delays
  • Flood rules raise worries at the Shore
  • In Devon, luxury homes threaten old barn
  • Tom and Rita Alessio found out the hard way that adding a "mother-in-law suite" to one's home is a no-no in Cherry Hill.

    They built the addition in 2007 so their grown daughter, Bernadette, could comfortably live under their roof.

    Now the Alessios, who are in their 90s, want to sell their home in the township's Kingston section.

    The snag: The single-story backyard extension for which they obtained municipal approvals is considered illegal because it has a full kitchen.

    Prospective buyer Dorothy Leafey, 61, wants the kitchen so she can live independently; her son, John, 38, would reside in the original portion of the house. "This is ridiculous," she says.

    "Cherry Hill has gone goofy or something," adds Tom Alessio, 93, a retired carpenter. "Somebody didn't know what they were doing."

    "Miscommunication" may have led the township's zoning and code enforcement offices to separately sign off on the Alessios' applications in 2007, says Erin Gill, Cherry Hill's director of policy and planning. "Essentially there were two sets of plans."

    "Nothing was misrepresented," insists Stuart Platt, a Stratford lawyer who previously represented the Alessios. "They filed a detailed architectural plan."

    From the News Desk
    Stay Connected

    Cherry Hill ordinances lump "mother-in-law suites" with auto-salvage businesses, junkyards, and heliports as impermissible in residential areas. The township wants to prevent single-family homes from conversion into duplexes or rental apartments, which makes sense.

    But the in-law ban is excessive - particularly given America's growing need for multigenerational living.

    Such a ban "curtails the possibility of families being together," says Trudi Herman, founder and vice president of It Takes a Village-NJ, a grassroots organization in Moorestown that advocates aging-in-place rather than in institutions.

    "There are definitely some municipalities that have found a successful middle ground" with such zoning issues, adds David C. Burdick, director of the Stockton Center for Successful Aging, at Richard Stockton College of New Jersey.

    "The big picture is the aging of the 72 million baby boomers, and the fact that they had fewer children than their parents," Burdick adds. "We need to be open-minded and flexible as we adjust to this."

    Gill insists Cherry Hill is flexible. A family can apply for a zoning variance for a home addition, and variances can carry conditions to prevent conversion of a single-family home into apartments.

    The township is hardly trying to preserve itself in amber; commercial strips like Route 70 and Haddonfield Road are evolving dramatically to suit the needs of businesses. Why shouldn't neighborhoods evolve to meet the needs of people who live there?

    "If a house can be changed so there are two separate living areas, it is so much easier to keep the [older person] independent, and out of a nursing home," Burdick says. "Quality of life is so much better if you're with your family but can have some separation from them."

    Eager to sell, the Alessios have agreed to knock $6,000 off the price; the Leafeys have opted to remove the stove and cap the gas line. This will transform the kitchen into a "kitchenette," clearing the way for the township to certify the house as single-family to the mortgage company.

    And Gill says Cherry Hill is willing to reexamine the ban if there's an uptick in requests for in-law suite variances.

    "We haven't seen that," she says.

    I wouldn't be surprised if they do.

     


    Contact Kevin Riordan

    at 856-779-3845 or kriordan@phillynews.com, or follow on Twitter @inqkriordan. Read the Metro columnists' blog, "Blinq," at www.phillynews.com/blinq.

     

    Kevin Riordan Inquirer Columnist
    email
    You May Also Like
    Comments  (33)
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:57 AM, 02/03/2013
      This would also eliminate sitting in ones senior apt with the fire alarm going off for hours on end even though the fire dept has been to the senior complex. If you are on an upper floor you cannot get downstairs on the elevator. Gas stove; I would love a gas stove rather than the abysmal electric stoves that senior apts get. Would also like a steady stream of hot water for a shower and hot water in sink regulated so it does not burn your fingers off. Would also like to get TV reception without cable; you cannot get that in a building built with steel girders that create a cage. Would love to be in a mother-in-law suite to live out my golden years.
      nacejan
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:22 AM, 02/03/2013
      These additions make perfect sense when more and more people are living so long and unable to be completely on their own. Wake up, Cherry Hill.
      farhorizons
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:05 AM, 02/03/2013
      New Jersey is a great state to be "FROM"! Too many local yokel ordinances telling other people they must confirm to someone else's way of life.
      hapedaze
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:15 AM, 02/03/2013
      Kevin wrote "America's growing need for multigenerational living." Really? Since when? Be more specific and add a timeline as to when this need began in this area. This is Cherry Hill not Norf Philly with 3 or 4 generations under 1 roof.
      Sportyrider71
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:15 AM, 02/03/2013
      This happens in PA, too, and the problem wasn't just with the township -- it was with the builder, who said "We just don't build things like that here" when I asked about building an in-law apartment attached to the house. I said, "What about the apartment over the garage in that house over there, where the couple's unemployed grown child lives?" Builder said, "That's different". So, if you say the apartment is for your unemployed kid, maybe that will have more traction. As for us, we took our $$$ and built elsewhere.
      icantbelieveit
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:24 AM, 02/03/2013
      The 3rd Reich!
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:14 PM, 02/03/2013
      Seriously -- that's the mature comment you thought to post?
      Jen D
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:30 AM, 02/03/2013
      The good folks at the zoning board may have a few loose nuts. Here they violently enforce their often redicules ordinances, but someone running businesses, like car repair, out of their homes, well, for some reason, they can only do so much.
      bucky95
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:46 AM, 02/03/2013
      You want the facts Sporty google it. On my suburban block alone there are three in-law suite additions - very nicely done. A few friends of ours have built homes with separate living areas for their aging parents. I would gladly home my parents when the time comes rather then have them stuck in a home. IF you're trying to find some racial angle to this with your "Norf" Philly comment you just look dumb.
      lulu
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:59 AM, 02/03/2013
      I am very familiar with this situation and I can say that with 100% confidence that there are not 2 set a plans. The Cherry Hill Zoning Officer considers the survey and the floor plans as 2 sets of plans even though they are 2 completely different things. The Allessio's would have to pay an attorney $5000, Cherry Hill another $1000 to apply to the zoning board for the exact same approval they already have from cherry Hill Twp. Cherry Hill's own employees have told the buyers and the Allessio's that the Board NEVER approved in law suites. The Cherry Hill Zoning Board Attorney Sandy Zeller( Law partner of convicted felon Wayne Bryant) admitted that Cherry Hill had no legal right to do what they are doing but that they would only change their position if a judge order it forcing the Allessio's to spend another $25,000 to win in court what they already legally have.
      MarathonRunner
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:03 AM, 02/03/2013
      Here is a crazy and scary fact, their is NO state over sight of Zoning Officers by the State. A zoning officer can do as they please, and the only way to deal with a zoning officer is through spending THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of dollar to take the town to court. The State Dept of Community Affairs over sees everything you can think of but no one over sees power drunk zoning officers
      MarathonRunner
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:25 AM, 02/03/2013
      Lulu, your reading comprehension is lacking. " They built the addition in 2007 so their grown daughter, Bernadette, could comfortably live under their roof." The parents built it for their aging daughter, not vice versa. duh!
      Sportyrider71
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:39 AM, 02/03/2013
      Marathon runner, props to you, couldn't have said it better!! "Sad state of affairs"
      Chosen one
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:58 AM, 02/03/2013
      While I understand the thinking behind the old ordinance, changing circumstances of the population should be driving a careful change in policy. If the present public servants are incapable of change or do not keep up with change, especially in an area like Cherry Hill, which should have an abundance of people the intellectual capacity to understand people's needs then new policy makers are in order.
      johnny eagle
    • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:06 PM, 02/03/2013
      Marathon Runner, you should be leading a campaign based on this persistent problem which causes endless confusion and costs both residential and commercial. Who supports this system? Which lobby has the ear of the state ? The state cannot think that this organizational structure works. Therefore, there must be politically advantageous funding behind it.
      johnny eagle


    View comments: 1  |  2  |  3