Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

U-turn in state rep's DUI case

STATE REP. Cherelle Parker appeared near tears and refused to speak with reporters after leaving a Philadelphia courtroom yesterday. The Northwest Philadelphia Democrat had reason to weep, and her attorney, Joseph Kelly, had reason to promise an appeal and declared himself "shocked."

Drunk with power? A Common Pleas judge says Judge Charles Hayden (above left) "abused his discretion" by throwing out all evidence against state Rep. Cherelle Parker (above) in her DUI case.
Drunk with power? A Common Pleas judge says Judge Charles Hayden (above left) "abused his discretion" by throwing out all evidence against state Rep. Cherelle Parker (above) in her DUI case.Read more

STATE REP. Cherelle Parker appeared near tears and refused to speak with reporters after leaving a Philadelphia courtroom yesterday.

The Northwest Philadelphia Democrat had reason to weep, and her attorney, Joseph Kelly, had reason to promise an appeal and declared himself "shocked."

That's because Common Pleas Judge Paula Patrick reinstated Parker's drunken-driving charges after ruling that Municipal Judge Charles Hayden in November had "abused his discretion" by throwing out all evidence against Parker.

Patrick also ruled that Hayden should have recused himself from the case because he and the politician are Facebook friends.

Parker, 39, who represents the 200th Legislative District, which includes Mount Airy, Chestnut Hill and Roxborough, was arrested on DUI charges in the early-morning hours of April 30.

Two city police officers said that they stopped her state-owned SUV after they saw it going the wrong way down one-way Haines Street, in Germantown.

After hearing Parker and arresting officers Israel Miranda and Stephanie Allen testify during a September motion hearing, Hayden in November ruled that the officers lacked credibility and that the traffic stop was not lawful.

His ruling meant that all evidence from the stop was not admissible in court.

That evidence included the officers' testimony that Parker's eyes appeared glassy, that she smelled of alcohol, that her speech was slowed, that she was unsteady on her feet and that a Breathalyzer test measured her blood-alcohol level at 0.16 - twice the legal limit.

"We're back in the ballgame," a pleased state Senior Deputy Attorney General John J. Flannery Jr. said after leaving court.

"The other evidence - the Breathalyzer, etc. - will come in at the Municipal Court trial," said Flannery. "We'll be able to try this defendant."

His office is handling the case at the request of city District Attorney Seth Williams, a friend of Parker's.

"The Attorney General's Office decided to put Judge Hayden on trial here, which is a disgrace," Kelly said.

He said he would file an appeal to Superior Court by week's end.

"This is the worst testimony I've ever seen out of 15,000 DUI cases that I have done," Kelly added, speaking of the officers.

Kelly maintained that Parker had not driven the wrong way down Haines and that she and Hayden are not friends, despite the Facebook connection.