Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Inquirer Daily News

Tell Me About It: 'Unconditional love' gets smoky

Your willingness to live with a person, or condone that person´s actions, or even visit that person, can be independent of that baseline love. (iStock)<br />
Your willingness to live with a person, or condone that person's actions, or even visit that person, can be independent of that baseline love. (iStock)

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

Question: I was interested in the question from the woman whose boyfriend started smoking and said, "This is me, deal with it." I have been mulling over the concept of unconditional love. Where does unconditional love fit into this sort of situation? Or is unconditional love only applicable between parents and children?

Answer: I'm not sure even parents and children have unconditional love. There are betrayals deep enough to destroy what are arguably humanity's closest bonds.

To me, barring such extreme betrayals, unconditional love in a practical sense is that your love is for whom you know a person to be - sense of humor, intellect, way of looking at the world, history with you, talents, strengths, expressions, stories - that aren't affected by this or that belief or action or outcome.

More coverage
  • Husband finds job in Asia, wife is fearful to go
  • Visiting dad beefs, but it's really not about the food
  • Longtime live-in in-laws don't contribute to household costs
  • I suppose an outcome can reveal that what you thought you knew about a person was wrong, and so there's always a condition somewhere, but I still think people have a baseline self, and loving that is as close to unconditional as we can get.

    However, your willingness to live with that person, or condone that person's actions, or even visit that person, can be independent of that baseline love.

    I don't think the love in the smoking question rose to the level of "unconditional," but let's say it had, in the sense that the letter-writer loved the resumed-smoker for reasons not subject to change. In that case, the letter-writer could still end the relationship over the behavior - it would just be a matter of, "I love you completely but there's no amount of love that will keep me in a home with a smoker."

    Which does happen, of course. One can have "unconditional" love (as pragmatically defined) both for a partner and for oneself, right? And in that case, when the two are at odds, you have to choose one.

    For unconditional love that doesn't have any strings or disclaimers, we have dogs.

    Comment: I knew you wouldn't complete that answer without mentioning dogs. Not that I disagree.

    Answer: Couldn't, I think, is the word.

    Comment: Dogs have taught me about unconditional love, but what I've learned from cats over the years is that it's important too, if you can, to give the kind of love someone wants and is able to accept. Too often we want to give the kind of love we want to give or the kind that makes us feel good. Cats in particular seem hardwired to be able to receive only the kind of love they want, regardless of whether you want to be all snuggly and kissy-face with them.

    Answer: It just kills me that you have a point. Thanks.

    Comment: Questions like this make me think the asker is too wedded to abstract principles. And there are some pernicious ones out there, like "The One" and "soul mate" and "we were meant to be together."

    Answer: True. Labels seem to distort more than they ever enlighten.

     


    tellme@washpost.com

    Chat with Carolyn Hax online at noon Fridays at www.washingtonpost.com.

     

    Carolyn Hax
    Latest Videos:
    Also on Philly.com
    Stay Connected