Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Sunday, June 15, 2008

 

Much has been said and written about Tim Russert since his shocking death. I want to focus on just three remarks.

Chris Matthews said, "He was the hardest worker you can be."

Sally Quinn, the Washington doyenne, said, "He worked harder than anybody I've ever known in my life."

Barbara Walters said, "We have to think, do we work too hard?...What does this say about our own lives?"

Tim Russert, despite his hard-won status as the best political broadcaster in the business, never seemed larger than life. He was more like an exuberant  kid let loose in the world's biggest candy store. His joie de vivre on the job - coupled with his diligence, like a parochial school kid who had mastered his homework - made him appealingly human. His wielding of that whiteboard on election night 2000 ("Florida, Florida, Florida"), and again in 2004, was a decidedly human touch, especially when you see all the high-tech bells and whistles on the broadcasts this year, particularly CNN.

And, sadly, his manner of leaving this life - literally working his heart out for his vocation - was all too human.

Until this kind of tragedy occurs - a 58-year-old man taking medication for asymptomatic coronary disease, tending to his far-flung family, and working virtually 24/7 on an historic presidential election - it is easy to overlook this fundamental truth: Those of us who write or broadcast politics for a living are only human.

Our work is, quite often, physically exhausting. One does no favor to the body by working until 2 a.m. on an endless string of primary nights, then getting up at 6 and trying to fire up the brain for another long day and evening. I've been there all too many times, dating back to 1992. I have nodded off in many of America's finest airports. But Russert had us all beaten; one co-worker remarked the other night that, over the course of the protracted Obama-Clinton contest, he repeatedly drove himself to exhaustion...all while shuttling to Buffalo, where he had to re-situate his elderly father; and to Boston for his son's college graduation, and then to Rome for the post-grad celebration, and then back again for Meet the Press, his stints on Morning Joe and evening cable and The Today Show, and his story-planning duties as Washington bureau chief.

I'm not suggesting that such outsize human exertions should therefore protect us all from criticism. That's how the game is played, and we willingly choose this game. Russert, indeed, took a lot of heat. He was rebuked for being too hard on politicians, and rebuked for being too soft. He was maligned in some circles as a mouthpiece for "the liberal media," and assailed by others as an establishment lackey (or, as liberal blogger Glen Greenwald put it not long ago, "a government propagandist").

Whatever. Russert understood that such diverse reactions were inevitable; mostly, he was too busy having fun with his hard work, and working hard at his fun. I met him only twice, but I saw it all on his face. Prior to a debate in New Hampshire five years ago, in the makeshift press workroom, we struck up a quick conversation about the issue of the moment. He asked what I thought. I don't remember my answer - it was nothing profound - but his expression has stayed with me ever since: Unmitigated glee. Glee at the prospect of what the evening might bring. Glee like a kid at the entrance to a ballpark, preparing to pass through the turnstile.

Just hours before his death on Friday, fresh off a plane from Rome, Russert was characteristically enthused about the show he was planning for today: Joe Biden versus Lindsey Graham ("It could be a vice-presidential audition"). He was looking ahead to the '08 finals, and the challenge of how the press should handle the inevitable lies and smears:

"What we hope to do in this campaign is recognize there are big differences on big issues between John McCain and Barack Obama – the war in Iraq, Iran, Social Security, taxes.  You don’t need to get into this other stuff.  If it does surface, then I think the mainstream media has an obligation not to just instinctively put it out there without vetting it.  Or, if it is something that is manufactured as a virus, report on that – who did it and why."

If he had not worked this hard, he would not have been the guy we knew. He even left us some good advice going forward.

He was, only in hindsight, excessive in his pursuits, and indeed there is a hideously human dimension to this tragedy: a father has lost a son, and a son has lost a father, all in the wake of Father's Day. It's surely no consolation to his family if we note that Russert dedicated himself to the pursuit of a noble cause: journalism, the free flow of information, the First Amendment, the need (more than ever) to hold politicians accountable for their words and actions. That, in fact, is more than a noble cause. It is patriotism.

 

Posted by Dick Polman @ 10:20 AM  Permalink | 38 comments
Comments   
Posted 03:07 PM, 06/16/2008
chrissmith
Tim Russert, RIP. That being said, there are real lessons to learn from his death. If Russert did indeed die from over-working, that's pretty sad, isn't it? It's the state of our society: CAREERISM. It used to be that a career SUPPLEMENTED your life. Now, with people in careers, it's all they think or do. Sad. Everyone in high-powered careers is trying to get more money, more fame, more deals. Russert's death is the sad end result. He literally worked himself to death.
Comment removed.
Posted 12:56 PM, 06/16/2008
jack russell
the russert death is a big blow to the obama campaign. russert lost a lot of viewers and respect,he when slanted towards obama in the primaries.
Posted 10:50 AM, 06/16/2008
chazzbo
Bonus points to anyone who can make "Meet The Press" watchable. Like others, I was more heartened to learn that he was a genuinely a good person with his family and friends. Posts here would indicate that he both pleased and angered those from all points on the political spectrum, and that tells me he did his job about as well as can be expected in DC.
Posted 08:54 AM, 06/16/2008
scrooge1
I saw his son on the Today show and was struck how much he looked like his Father. But more importantly, how the Father raised his son. Politics aside, he was a decent human being.
Comment removed.
Posted 11:58 PM, 06/15/2008
tom - wilmington, de
Russert was great on Meet The Press...one of the better journalists out there. But the coverage and columns of his death are way overboard. It is nearly Midnight Sunday night and MSNBC is still covering it...enough already. I even heard a doctor on the radio using his death to help market his heart supplements....talk about inappropriate. Russert lived, did what he loved to do, and died too early....like millions of others that are just less well known.
Posted 10:49 PM, 06/15/2008
yobill626
Sometimes you can be so inside that you can get played --- as Russert probably was by the Administration in 2002. Edward R. Murrow was no different. For example, he came out against McCarthy, but it was very late. Keeping that "edge" (like Russert had in the '90's) that drives musicians, comedians, politicians --- all of us really --- tends to fade a bit over time. Russert continued to do a good, professional job of keeping us informed until he died. What more can you ask? RIP, Tim!
Posted 10:22 PM, 06/15/2008
Swift2001
I don't want to speak ill of the man, but these obloquies get ridiculous. Sacrifice? The man was the ultimate political insider who was hired by Jack Welch, the right-wing billionaire, and he made, by most estimates, about $10 million a year. The press corps is actually comparing the man to Edward R. Murrow, who did risk his career, not once but several times, and ended up fired because he insisted on real news. Russert didn't question Iraq until it was far too late, and his "tough questions" were usually phony and selectively applied. He's just the wrong model for journalism going forward.
Posted 08:23 PM, 06/15/2008
pal
I guess my first comment got rejected even though I agreed with Wayne and am extremely sympathetic for his family. But I cannot agree that his career has been all 'noble' and 'journalistic,' especially in the last few years.
Posted 08:01 PM, 06/15/2008
vc bear
Tim was the Hugh Sidey of our day. Even Steve Forbes wrote a piece to honor him. To bad you will never walk in those shoes Dick. Russert was fair and balanced even for the liberal press. He is a loss to America and yes a patriot and someone who repected the Constitution.
Posted 07:53 PM, 06/15/2008
60th Street
I'll bet Tim Russert can't wait to be buried, so that he can start rolling over in his grave. This is a disgusting media circus the likes of which I have never seen. This article is abhorrent.
Posted 06:56 PM, 06/15/2008
kjuggs77
"The Ultimate Sacrifice"?? How insulting- he died doing want he loved to do...it's no sacrifice to do what you want to do. Going to war on someone else's order and fulfilling your duties even though you might disagree or get killed in order to preserve this nation for yours and someone else's children- that the real ultimate sacrifice.
Posted 06:19 PM, 06/15/2008
pal
Wayne, you said it best. I have enormous sympathy for his family - I think 58 is too young to die, and I had heard from people who met him that he was a really nice and caring guy to know personally. But that said, it is sad that his nobility to his 'journalism' career will always have a notable footnote of conflict of interest, where he failed to do the right thing when Scooter Libby called Russert to discuss CIA Agent Valerie Plame Wilson. Too bad he didn't do anything 'noble' or 'journalistic' back in 2003 when he first learned this treasonous information. Maybe then we would not have had another 4 more disastrous years of bush and cronies. So no, I am not giving his memory any credit for noble journalism.
Posted 06:09 PM, 06/15/2008
Waiting4U
My condolences to Tim Russert's family and friends. While all of the accolades from his media colleagues serve as a forum for their grief, I think that after a month or so when some objective review of Tim's career is done, especially his nearly shameful recent work since 2000, will not be regarded as the beacon of journalism that is echoing around these last few days. That is, if the reviews are honest. The Political media, and thier journalists especially, are nearly incapable of self-evaluaton with any level of integrity. They live and work and socialize with the people they are supposed to be reporting on (Diane Sawyer, anyone?).
Posted 06:05 PM, 06/15/2008
CPTD
"it is easy to overlook this fundamental truth: Those of us who write or broadcast politics for a living are only human."...No Dick, only you and your elitist media types think you are above the rest of us humans. I like Tim Russert, and read two of his books, but the ultimate sacrifice is being made by my brothers and sisters all over the world, not by a journalist returning from a week in Rome, hanging out in DC. Earth to Dick and the rest of the media who are ready to declare a national day of mourning....we all liked Russert, but everyday a kid dies overseas making the ultimate sacrifice, don't cheapen their sacrifice by writing articles like this junk.
Posted 04:11 PM, 06/15/2008
StacyMevoli
Just curious as to why you chose the words "in the WAKE of Father's Day", since Tim's death came on Friday, and Father's Day is TODAY?!
Posted 03:42 PM, 06/15/2008
wagonjak
The full court press of the news media to canonize Russert, which includes this column, is somewhat absurd. The man was entertaining, he seemed like a nice man, but like Matthews, Brokow and others he was one of the enablers of this war. From a comment at Salon: It is sad when anyone dies young. Before Russert is canonized, as a sainted political journalist, however, it is well worth remembering 1) At the Libby trial, Russert made a point at how he treated all his conversations with Administration insiders as off-the-record unless otherwise instructed. Such suck-up stenography is not good political journalism, but it is how Washington journalism works. 2) Testimony at the Libby trial also revealed that far from fearing Russert as a tough interrogator, Cheney's office that he was a pushover: "I suggested we put the vice president on 'Meet the Press,' which was a tactic we often used," Martin testified. "It's our best format." (Daily Kos 1/25/2007). 3) Russert may have been a journalist's journalist, but that is because he epitomized much that is wrong with mainstream political journalism - no that its partisan, but because it is fixated on trivia - flag-pins and other pseudo-issues like candidate's haircuts or whether or not they were sincere when they cried, gotcha quotes - and, above all else, the political horse race. What passes for political discussion is usually vapid and issue free. Russert was just better at this than the other entertainers on Sunday morning TV
Posted 03:04 PM, 06/15/2008
tomdurk
RIP Tim Condolences, Russert family. But this worship is going way overboard. It reminds be of a classic article by Espeland & Halliday on the rise of the American Bar Association. Early in the 20th century they self-consciously started a PR program to make lawyers seem more valuable & yes, patriotic. They took out full page obits extolling the heroism & general wonderfulness of lawyers. Effective PR. Journalists, who have been blind enablers of government corruption & incompetence for at least the last 8 years, are using Russert the same way now. National-esp Beltway--media has become what Colbert described. If you want to give me $5 million a year to spout nonsense w/ the promise of death in 19 years, I would take it. I would even have a lobotomy and ask about flag pins and bowling. And I would not pretend it is a heroic, patriotic sacrifice.
Posted 01:46 PM, 06/15/2008
DAEnnis
I've had mixed feelinggs about the past few days. Tim Russert was always an interesting and well prepared interviewer, and in my opinion at least, quite even-handed and fair in who he critisized and how. His passing was tragic in that it came well before his time should have been up. What truely saddens me though is the way his death has been covered. While I think Russert is most definitly owed his due from the networks, i think he would have been a little miffed that they are concentrating so much on him, and less so on the events happening right now in the world. The empty moderators chair was a nice touch, but I think the best tribute to him would have been to bring in the guests as planned, find a person who is know as a tough interviewer, and grill them on the issues. I'm sure Russert would have looked down from heaven, and sat there listening with that same big grin on his face, now spectator to the legacy he has created.
Posted 01:41 PM, 06/15/2008
LittlePig
>>This post got you a coveted Atrios link. "coveted" only if there is no such thing as bad publicity. Bad form or no, this editorial is way over the top. Working yourself to death is not "the ultimate sacrifice", particularly when pulling down $5 million a year, and saying it is the ultimate sacrifice demeans the troops in Iraq. Tim Russert was very deferential to this Administration, and particularly to Vice President Cheney. He was not "holding politicians accountable for their words and actions" when he uncritically passed along Mr. Cheney's disinformation (see Cathy Martin's comment in the Libby testimony), and he did not push for the free flow of information when he sat on information that in a sane republic would have led to Mr. Cheney's impeachment. Given Mr. Russert's considerable bias for those in power, I don't think he deserves any particular accolades as a journalist. He lacked objectivity. He was an exceptional businessman, an exceptional Catholic, and an exceptional interviewer, but all those things don't make him a journalist anymore than it makes him a brain surgeon. Speak honestly of the dead. Don't aggrandize Mr. Russert so that all media hacks can bask in reflected glory.
Posted 01:03 PM, 06/15/2008
jjcomet
I can't believe my post was censored when it contained not a trace of profanity or slander, yet "mike I" is allowed to post a comment claiming that "Liberal and conservative bloggers are foul-mouthed and invariably wrong.Most print any rumor or hearsay as fact and curse any who have the opposite view." In hindsight, I'm shocked that you posted Wayne's comment, it not being characterized by obsequious fawning to Mr. Russert's mad journalistic and patriotism skillz...
Posted 12:55 PM, 06/15/2008
Djoko Pritza
Russert was probably a great person, so people say, and a hard worker, no doubt. And his death is sad, especially for his family and colleagues. But he was part of a fading empire: the MSM that thinks covering the issues is putting on a representative of one side and a representative of the other and asking them questions that they don't answer. God bless him.
Posted 12:38 PM, 06/15/2008
yobill626
I also thought Tim Russert was a great American, & the fact that he worked so hard at communicating the truth does make him a patriot. However, looking at the amount of coverage his death has generated (all day & night on MSNBC for example), seems to match what we saw when Reagan died. Honestly, its been a bit too much. I'd have to think that he touched so many people in the MSM, that they are just using this opportunity to deal with their own feelings. Sadly, watching Meet The Press today was like watching a group of people on one big psychiatrist's couch purging their feelings for their own benefit, not ours.
Posted 12:37 PM, 06/15/2008
mike l
You are right, wayne, everyone of those who have died for bush's war is important. Howvere, we do not know them for the most part. We know Tim Russert. He was the one asking the questions as to why bush got us into the mess that killed so many. He was theone who could make the neo-cons look foolish on their answers to those questions. He was the one who asked the questions we wanted answered. Did he make Dems look divided and incompetent? No, he only reported on what they were actually doing to each other, embarassing or not. Liberal and conservative bloggers are foul-mouthed and invariably wrong.Most print any rumor or hearsay as fact and curse any who have the opposite view. Russert, though not always on target, gave everyone the chance to their say and then nailed them with either a word or an incredulous look. We don't see the dead of Iraq, bush won't let them be shown.We do see the death of someone like Tim Russert and maybe he will have to stand in for all the others.
Posted 12:36 PM, 06/15/2008
jjcomet
The "ultimate sacrifice?" God, how embarrassingly fulsome and melodramatic - not to mention completely inappropriate. Others have said as well as can I how little Tim Russert ever did to foster "the free flow of information, the First Amendment, the need (more than ever) to hold politicians accountable for their words and actions." He was a high-paid celebrity interviewer whose subjects were politicians. The notion that "Meet the Press" or any of the stage-managed political programs on TV actually inform the public or illuminate important issues is a conceit held almost solely by journalists who like to pat themselves and each other on the back far too heartily for being able to rub shoulders with the powerful. If Russert and other journalists had done their jobs 5 or 6 years ago, perhaps the country would be in much better shape than it is now. The people who have made the ultimate sacrifice are the thousands of young man and women who have died in Iraq because Russert and his cronies were far too close to the subjects they covered to give a damn about trying to discover the truth. I grieve for his family and rejoice in no one's death, but please spare us such maudlin tripe as this. The media has become an embarrassment to this country and, sad to say, Mr. Russert was highly complicit in that turn of events.
Posted 12:24 PM, 06/15/2008
phatti
Wayne, yeah, i'm glad you stayed tactful and didn't recite all that.
Posted 12:15 PM, 06/15/2008
Ryan
i was a big fan of tim russert, but come on people. what about the 4000+ 18 to 22 year old kids that have died for this pointless war in Iraq! each and every one of those deaths is millions of times more tragic and saddening.
Posted 12:07 PM, 06/15/2008
Wayne
I will be tactful at this sad moment and not recite chapter and verse all of the ways Russert, in as obsequious a manner as possible, dutifully communicated the narratives fed to him by his corporate handlers to reinforce the messages that Democrats are hopelessly divided and ultimately incompetent, the Republicans are all knowing and eternally correct, and liberal bloggers are indecent, foul-mouthed louts who are perpetually wrong. Instead, I will only wonder why it took the untimely passing of someone in your inner circle to suddenly feel a shred of sympathy for a child no longer without a parent or a father who has lost a son. There are abundant examples to be found in the casualty list of Dubya's Iraq war, and none of these people ever earned a $5 million salary or owned a $7 million home on Nantucket Island.
Posted 11:53 AM, 06/15/2008
bro5
"Meet the Press" is a political strategist's dream arena for getting votes, slanting news stories and shaping conformist opinions. Whatever honest debate which does occur on this TV show is not patriotic -- it is just part of Russert's job. What's really sad is that all he gets are two wet newspapers, a flag made in China, some 7-11 flowers and a deli menu board? Why publish this image?
Posted 11:40 AM, 06/15/2008
StacyMevoli
sreichgott, nobody's death is "unexpected", untimely, sudden, shocking, maybe, but since we all die, no death is really "unexpected." RIP, Tim, I am proud that YOU were so proud of your faith and your family! You were just a regular guy who never lost that "regular" touch.
Posted 11:30 AM, 06/15/2008
sreichgott
He was a journalist who made millions. His death is horrible and sad and a true loss. But "ultimate sacrifice"? A "patriot sacrificing himself"? That's simply not what happened. He died an unexpected and tragic death. Come on now.
Posted 11:18 AM, 06/15/2008
Ouwachon
it's too bad you have to be dead to finally have nice things said about you.
Posted 11:09 AM, 06/15/2008
ivb
This post got you a coveted Atrios link.
Posted 11:05 AM, 06/15/2008
q2again
rudytbone is right.....enough already. now they are to the point of cheapening this great man's contribution. I thought the man was terrific. But even Russert would be the first to salute the average guy. ENOUGH. The media in it's self importance is making an embarrassment of the man's death.
Posted 11:00 AM, 06/15/2008
JOG
He was like a "friend" I will miss him on Sunday Mornings... I spent it "with" him for 16 yrs...
Posted 10:45 AM, 06/15/2008
rudytbone
I understand the sentiment...but change the headline. Ultimate Sacrifice? Please. Many people work themselves to exhaustion and bad health. Just because Russert was in the media does not make him more important that others; just more widely known. Stop trying to convince us of the "Nobility" of the media with Russet's death.
Comment removed.
38 comments | View All | Paginate Comments