Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
RELATED STORIES
 
Witnesses: Teen didn't throw that snowball
 
When it comes to 'Capitalism,' Moore gets the money shots
 
Santorum tests the 2012 waters in Iowa
 
What really happened on Wall Street?
 
TD Bank's computer woes
 
La Ronda reduced to rubble
 
N.J. governor candidates clash in first TV debate
 
N.J. man charged in killing of woman and her mother
 
Kidnap victim: I was raped daily
 
What was brewing at the Great American Beer Festival
 
Housing slump looks like it's over, and in a big way
 
Hey, buddy, got $950 mill?
 
Dear Abby: 'Coming out' creates social-networking anxiety with his past friends
 
Letterman sex case
 
Can creditors use IOUs to bid on papers? Judge to rule
 
Blind lawyer says hooker took him for 8G
 
A painful look at autism
 
'Whip It': Empowerment fable on Barbie skates
 
3 accused of stealing diners' credit card IDs
 
9 communities added to 'classic towns' list
 
Comcast, NBC Universal in advanced talks on merger
 
Convicted drug dealer testifies against friend
 
Councilman's employer made loans to contractor
 
Head of city-based drug ring gets 20 years


Think a gun protects you in a fight? Think again

If you have a gun during a fight, think twice about the protection it might offer.

Epidemiologists at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine yesterday announced the findings of a study about whether guns are protective or perilous during an assault.

It found that those possessing a gun in an assault situation were 4 1/2 times more likely to be shot than those not possessing one, according to the study's author, Charles C. Branas, associate professor of epidemiology.

It was released online this month in the American Journal of Public Health and will be printed in the November issue.

"It's a big question that has been asked for years," Branas said of the reason behind the study.

"One that is a very U.S.-oriented question but that also has applications outside the U.S.," Branas said.

Branas said that along with a team of about a dozen people, including colleagues, members of the Philadelphia Police Department and the city Medical Examiner's Office, he conducted a case control study, or an approximation of an experiment.

From 2003 to 2006, the police notified Branas and his team about all shootings that occurred in the city, he said.

"We would then get the data and pass it along to a survey-research firm to find an individual who had not been shot and ask them what they were doing and where they were at the time of the shooting," Branas said.

On average, they found that guns did not protect those who possessed them from being shot in an assault, he said.

"This study was an excellent way to approximate this experiment and begin to get an idea of how it works," Branas said.

He and his team hypothesized reasons as to why guns didn't protect individuals from being shot in an assault, including feeling falsely empowered and overreacting, possibly instigating something with someone, or entering a dangerous situation that one might normally avoid.

"I don't think this study is the end," Branas said. "I think it should help begin to raise awareness about gun possession and begin to question whether an individual is absolutely safe in possession of a firearm or whether it's promoting a false sense of security."

 

  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Real Estate
  • Rentals
 
SEARCH JOBS
Spotlight Deal
Rittenhouse Square 19103
Spotlight Deal
Mount Airy 19119
SEARCH REAL ESTATE
Spotlight Deal
Manayunk 19127
Spotlight Deal
East Falls 19129
SEARCH RENTALS
Daily Headlines
Subscribe now! Daily Headlines Newsletter