Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
TEXT SIZE: A A A A
email this
print this
reprint or license this
Tara Derby, CEO of the Philadelphia Animal Care and Control Association, checks on a cat that was awaiting adoption on Friday. The nonprofit group is under fire for uncontrollable kennel cough in dogs.
STEVEN M. FALK / Daily News
Tara Derby, CEO of the Philadelphia Animal Care and Control Association, checks on a cat that was awaiting adoption on Friday. The nonprofit group is under fire for uncontrollable kennel cough in dogs.
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment
SAVE AND SHARE


Stu Bykofsky: PACCA dogs suffering through out-of-control kennel cough

MOST OF THE dogs in the Philadelphia Animal Care and Control Association kennel are sick.

Despite three years of improvements in its operations and a steady rise in the number of animals spared from euthanasia, PACCA has failed to control kennel cough among dogs in its Feltonville shelter - and that has serious consequences for both volunteer rescue groups and potential adopters.

"Every dog I have pulled out of there is sick," says Jodi Specter, president of the local American Bulldog Rescue, who stopped taking PACCA dogs home for foster care "because they made my dogs sick."

Another rescue person, the Northeast's Rosemary DiStefano, says a pit bull "had a 105 fever when I took him. I went directly to the emergency room and it cost me $1,000 to treat for pneumonia."

It got to the point that, each time DiStefano went to PACCA to rescue a dog, "I went with doxycycline" - a medicine for kennel cough - "and started treating them right away," she says.

A 2004 Daily News exposé revealed the PACCA operation then to be a "House of Horrors" for animals. Everything from staff indifference to animal cruelty was detailed, resulting in a City Council hearing, followed by a new board and new management. This four-part series is another deep look into PACCA, assessing its successes - and there have been some, since our 2004 report - and its failures.

As someone who has been immersed in animal issues for a decade, I know of no person, no organization, involved in animal welfare that won't be bad-mouthed by some other person who cares about animals. Sadly, animal welfare infighting makes Shia/Sunni warfare seem like a debutante party. (Because of bad blood between PACCA and the Pennsylvania SPCA, which I believe wants to regain the animal-control contract it surrendered in 2002, no one from PSPCA was interviewed for this series.)


 

Several rescuers suspect that PACCA puts up sick animals for adoption to stick someone else with the medical bills. Others believe animals are rushed out the door to avoid the "E-room," where lethal injections are given. Some critics - and supporters - say PACCA will do anything to keep up its "save" rate, which is at a historic high.

"Our commitment is to work toward saving the lives of all the animals who enter our facility," says PACCA Chief Executive Officer Tara Derby, 34. "We consider those lives to be precious."

PACCA takes in 30,000 animals a year, "the vast majority of whom have never seen a veterinarian before entering our facility," Derby says. The city facility can turn no animal away, not even sick ones.

Clearly, PACCA is saving more animal lives: Since 2005, the combined dog/cat "save" rate tripled from less than 20 percent to more than 60 percent today.

With that said, so many dogs in PACCA's shelter have kennel cough, an upper-respiratory infection or URI, that many rescuers call it the "PACCA flu."

Derby admits that close to half the shelter's dogs may have kennel cough when the shelter is not packed, a rate she says rises to 60 percent when the shelter is jammed and airborne transmission is difficult to stop.

A former PACCA manager estimates the average to be more like 80 to 85 percent.

DiStefano used to go to PACCA when called, usually to pick up "special needs" dogs, such as those sick or injured. She hasn't gone in more than six months.

Specter worked with PACCA since it opened in 2002, but rarely goes now. DiStefano and Specter agreed to be quoted. Other rescue people requested anonymity, fearing that they might be barred from the city-financed shelter at 111 West Hunting Park Ave.

The "PACCA flu" charges arise as the city's $2.9 million contract with the agency was to expire on June 30. Health Commissioner Dr. Donald F. Schwarz has offered a six-month extension, which PACCA is weighing. Meanwhile, Dana Spain-Smith, the combative president of PACCA's board of directors since December 2005, resigned in mid-April, replaced by Reed Smith attorney John Martini. Spain-Smith remains on the board.


 

All large-volume shelters have some kennel cough, but PACCA has too much - and no effective way to control it.

One reason: The design of the shelter, which was a warehouse before conversion. It remains too hot in the summer and too cold in the winter.

"The issue is to control [kennel cough] through isolation, vaccinations, facility design, air flow," says John Snyder, vice president for companion animals of the Humane Society of the United States.

PACCA has no isolation room for dogs. It has no space for one - and it would require a separate ventilation system, because URI is airborne.

Having sick dogs in the kennel is a double whammy. First, URI can turn into pneumonia, which can be deadly and is costly to treat. Second, it's bad business to allow people to unknowingly adopt a sick animal and then find themselves saddled with unexpected vet bills.

"We had to hospitalize about four [PACCA dogs] in the last couple of months," said Lorraine Schreiber, director of the Burlington County Animal Alliance. (Her name had been given to me by PACCA as a friend of the shelter.) Despite the sick dogs, Schreiber gives PACCA and its staff good grades for trying hard and for cooperation.

Derby says that when PACCA knows an animal is sick, the adopter is given medicine. But symptoms don't always show at the shelter, and there is not always medicine on hand. PACCA does allow adopters to return animals at no charge, but that's a bad "after the fact" remedy.

"We're having a much harder time this year with upper-respiratory infections," admits Dr. Michael Moyer, PACCA vice president, who teaches shelter medicine at Penn's renowned vet school. There's no budget for "diagnostic surveillance," so dogs are only spot-checked as they arrive, he says.

Even if sick dogs are caught on arrival, it doesn't help. PACCA turns away no animal and since there's no isolation room, the sick dogs go into the kennel to spread whatever they have. As bad as kennel cough and pneumonia are, the shelter lives in fear of parvovirus, an infection so serious it can require a kennel population to be put down.

A new facility would help, or a revamp of the existing one, but the city is not ready to spring for it, Mayor Nutter told me.

While calling PACCA an "important" city service, Nutter won't budge before getting a report on "what the best practices are in the industry, what do other cities do," and what local vets, medical and internal policy staff recommend, he says.

When will he request such a report?

He declined to say, other than: "It's an important issue so I'm going to work on it with a sense of urgency."

Meanwhile, too many dogs suffer with the "PACCA flu." *

E-mail stubyko@phillynews.com or call 215-854-5977. For recent columns:

http://go.philly.com/byko.

Comments
08:20 AM, 05/12/2008
Boy, This is shocking...another city run operation in over it's head and with no solution in sight. Typical...
Posted by Shemp Howard
08:22 AM, 05/12/2008
boy, this is shocking..another city service that is in over its head and can't figure out a solution. Can we admit PACCA is a failure and bring in a REAL NO-KILL GROUP to fix the mess?
Posted by Shemp Howard
10:30 AM, 05/12/2008
I am a volunteer at the shelter and let me tell you this is a DEDICATED staff that does everything they can to save lives. I challenge all of you who are ready to criticize, including "Shemp Howard": PAWS is a 501 3c organization - why don't you make a donation? It's tax deductible. Better yet, why don't you volunteer at the shelter? We could use all of your help. Where is the money going to come for a "Real No-Kill Group?" PAWS/PACCA could be a "Real No-Kill Group" if more people would reach out to help. Period.
Posted by phr
11:13 AM, 05/12/2008
and it begins...bring to light the failures of PACCA and the thin skinned volunteers feel it's a slight against them...here they come out of the woodwork---
Posted by Shemp Howard
11:25 AM, 05/12/2008
It is interesting that it is PACCA's fault that the animals have Kennel cough and are sick, when they are not the people who are dropping off the dogs in the first place, or letting the animals run outside with no food and water. How about the people of Philadelphia who have no concern about animal welfare? All animals that come in to PACCA are examined by the clinic staff, and volunteers also make sure that if they see anything that the staff is alerted. Nine times out of ten the staff already knows and is on top of it, but PACCA/PAWS is working hard to eliminate Kennel cough more everyday.
Posted by alamond
11:28 AM, 05/12/2008
Also, No-kill groups cannot exist in a city where we have people who cannot handle caring for their own animals, and where dog fighting is running rampant. Shemp, do you want to adopt an animal that will bite you because it has been trained to attack humans? How many no-kill facilities do you know of in the city of Philadelphia?
Posted by alamond
11:31 AM, 05/12/2008
I've volunteered at a couple of shelters in different states, and every one had problems with kennel cough, even the plush, state of the art, no-kill shelter in Connecticut. It's like childrens' day care: if one kid gets sick, they all do. If you ever visit PACCA you'll see the problem is the building, NOT the care these animals receive. Despite expert veterinary staff and passionate volunteers, there's only so much PACCA can do with the budget and facilities it gets from the city.
Posted by lupulin
11:41 AM, 05/12/2008
hey alamond...did you even read the article? It says...Most of the dogs at PACCA have kennel cough---and PACCA has failed to control kennel cough among dogs in its Feltonville shelter ----it's obvious they aren't working hard enough or finding constructive ways to remedy the situation---it's their job to fix the problem--not come up with excuses as to why it's happening----I know of zero no kill facilities in philadelphia---what does that have to do with PACCA once again failing to live up to the job they are given? By the way---look up the term no-kill---it has nothing to do with not putting down animals that are dangerous to communities---i'll do the work for ya alamond...check out it--it's not really a novel idea... No Kill means that animals in shelters are given every opportunity to find good permanent homes. No Kill means that no animal is ever killed just to "make room." No Kill means that no animal is killed because it is "difficult to adopt." No Kill is more than just a phrase. It is a call to action through the implementation of life saving programs. No Kill does not mean that animals are never killed. Euthanasia (in the true sense of the word) is practiced when it is the only humane alternative. This occurs only when an animal is too sick or injured to be helped by reasonable medical care. Or, when an animal is a bona fide danger to people or other animals.
Posted by Shemp Howard
11:42 AM, 05/12/2008
It's a crappy system -- they are required by law to accept EVERY animal into a building that the City has not set up to isolate sick dogs. The cats have an isolation unit, and rescues have complimented PACCA on the condition of the cats coming out of that room-- they recover beautifully with a little extra care. But the dogs have the option of the Euth room or foster/rescue . . . which would *you* choose?
Posted by meira
12:39 PM, 05/12/2008
PAWS save rate is the best you are going to see in the city with far less money to work with, that speaks volumes for a dedicated volunteer base and staffing. If you are foolish enough to think other shelters do not have illnesses you are not looking in their freezers or trash cans...pacca tries to save them not kill them. Shemp Howard have you ever volunteered at an animal shelter? Cleaned a cage, bathed or walked a homeless dog, tried like heck to get a senior or disabled dog adopted when a shelter is out of room.
Posted by savecritters
01:30 PM, 05/12/2008
savecritters...to answer all three--yes, yes, and yes...at pacca too..and at other local shelters..but what does that have to do with the article? once again..the volunteers miss the jist---please..read the article again---maybe it's about time PACCA or PAWS or whatever it wants to be called stops making excuses and starts figuring out ways to fix the issues--or let someone else do it---It's obvious Mayor Nutter believes this because he won't just dump money down the pockets of PACCA and see the same half hearted results and excuses. Stop bashing the messenger, the article, the city, the residents --it's everyone else's fault but the group contracted to do the job? these are the same volunteers that bashed the PSPCA on 6ABC website when they got into the spat with PACCA over dumping sick dogs on the PSPCA...PSPCA stated their problem and the PACCA volunteers came out in force to bash the SPCA--it gets old people..start looking at PACCA--before you blame everyone else.
Posted by Shemp Howard
01:35 PM, 05/12/2008
If this agency cannot take care of these dogs/cats/ etc. they need to surrender the ones they have to a responsible agency, yes, even there is bad blood between them, the life of these creatures are way more important than squabbles between agencies. We're talking about lives here, they need to bury the hachet and work together and stop embarressing themselves. People and animals depend on them and this is no way to operate. Shame on PACCA and TARA!
Posted by tulipwalk
02:34 PM, 05/12/2008
shemp I happen to know most of the truth behind the entire long drawn out story from all sides. Yes pacca had a bad problem with kc or a canine flu during the winter. I wrote a long response but it is not showing up. Plain and simple pacca needs better funding for an iso room for dogs and better air quality. The kc is not as prevalent now that new cleaning procedure has been implemented with help from the aspca. The problem in my opinion is multi faceted, the top two problems facing all of Philly's animals is more funding is needed and these ceo's need to work together. If you are involved in animal rescue you know how many egos will get in each others way. Well that needs to end. We need a combined effort of all rescues and shelters to work together and not back stab each other when their feathers get ruffled. Tulipwalk who do you suggest pacca surrender the animals to? Morris has a high kill rate, the pspca deemed cats with ear mites or fleas as unadoptable in the contract they refused to agree upon with pacca. Pacca hate them or love them is the safest place for these animals at this date. Pacca has the highest save rate with the largest intake of all animals not just the cute young highly adoptable ones. Part of this rate is because of a partnership with rescues, the rest is hard work by volunteers and staff. Myself and many other volunteers foster sick animals so they are healthy and then spayed or neutered when they are adopted. We are not hiding from people that an animal is sick. Sometimes an animal may get sick later, I adopted a dog from the Humane Society who became very ill I did not blame them, I took my dog to a vet. Until we as a people demand more money for animal welfare, become responsible to spay and neuter our pets and genuinely care nothing will change. If you say shame on Tara and Pacca I also say shame on the pspca, Howard and every rescue organization who can't see past petty bs and bruised feelings and work for a common goal.
Posted by savecritters
02:37 PM, 05/12/2008
Shemp what exactly do you propose they do?? The article clearly points out that the biggest problem is the building structure and poor ventilation. Unless Tara Derby is secretly a contractor, what is she (PACCA) supposed to do??? Instead of pointing fingers at PACCA, why don't you write the city??? Contact you councilmen and the mayor... The CITY needs to care more about these animals, PACCA is already doing the best they can with what they have to work with... and Tulipwalk the PSPCA has there own issues with Kennel Cough, they take medical emergencies... not dogs with Kennel Cough. Even if PACCA wanted to give them a pit bull with Kennel cough they wouldn't take it. They have their own. bottom line is the issue is the building, the City needs to take care of it, and the only reason Stu is making a big deal about it being "PACCA flu" is because he wouldn't have an article if he didn't. sad.
Posted by PaigeM
02:49 PM, 05/12/2008
PACCA was given a WAREHOUSE! What do you expect them to do? There is no way that the facility is large enough or that PACCA has the money in its tight budget to do a major overhall that is needed to create ISO-rooms for dogs, seperate ventilation systems or anything along those lines. Every dog that is adopted gets three weeks of free vet care that the shelter can provide. Adopters are always being told by volunteers about kennel cough. They routinely tell adopters to bring their newly adopted dog in and they will receive FREE medicine to treat the kennel cough. PACCA is also always telling people to quarintine their dogs for ten days when their is another animal in the home. No matter what organization takes over this contract, this city will never become no kill until its citizens dedicate themselves to volunteering and responsable pet ownership.
Posted by Tiffseagles
36 comments | View All Comments
 
Spotlight Deal
Old City/Society Hill 19106
Spotlight Deal
Coatesville 19320
<