Sunday, February 7, 2016

Look who's expanding Medicaid now

Seven Republican governors have broken ranks and declared their support for expanding Medicaid in their states under Obamacare. The latest is Florida's Rick Scott, who made his surprise announcement this week.

Look who’s expanding Medicaid now


Seven Republican governors have broken ranks and declared their support for expanding Medicaid in their states under Obamacare. The latest is Florida’s Rick Scott, who made his surprise announcement this week.

To hear some of them explain their decisions, you might think they had undergone ideological conversions. Rick Scott declared, “I cannot, in good conscience, deny the uninsured access to care.” Gov. John Kasich of Ohio, citing the Bible, called expanding Medicaid a “moral imperative.” New Mexico’s Susana Martinez noted an obligation to provide care “for those most in need in our state.”

But there’s a deeper force at work – money. And the draw is not just money to help the poorest citizens gain access to health care. It is support for the providers that serve those citizens, primarily hospitals. Expanding Medicaid is a financial bonanza for many facilities and a financial lifeline for others.

Expanding Medicaid is a fundamental part of Obamacare. It is as central as the insurance exchanges, the mandate to obtain coverage, or any other provision of the law. It was projected to add 16 million people to coverage rolls – half of the total who will be newly insured.

More coverage
Are doctors in it for the money?
You’re about to find out what health insurance really costs
Doctors die differently than their patients
We’re a lot sicker than we realize
U.S. healthcare costs: It’s time to get worried
Your Health Flexible Spending Account just got a little less flexible

It does this by eliminating variations among states in eligibility rules. It directs all states to cover all residents with incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level. As things now stand, some states set limits for certain categories of the poor as low as 20%, and many of the poorest citizens, including adults without small children, receive no benefits at all.

The carrot to entice states to go along is money – lots of it. The federal government will pick up the entire tab for the added coverage for the first three years and at least 90% after that. That’s millions of dollars each year for states like Pennsylvania and New Jersey to support health care.

As originally designed, the law also included a large stick for federal officials to use against states that declined to go along. They would lose funding for their entire Medicaid programs. With that kind of carrot and stick, it seemed like an offer they couldn’t refuse.

But the Supreme Court decision last summer changed that. The Justices left the carrot in place but ruled that the stick was unconstitutional. That made the offer a good one, but no longer one that states couldn’t necessarily pass up.

Many Republican governors, including Pennsylvania’s Tom Corbett, seized on this newfound opportunity to show their continued displeasure with Obamacare. If enough of them end up going along and declining to expand Medicaid, they could throw a hefty monkey wrench into health reform’s gears.

But money talks, often loud enough to drown out ideology. That’s especially true when a powerful mainstay of a state’s economy is involved. Hospitals are major employers and serve as financial engines for many regions, like Philadelphia. It’s difficult to leave millions of dollars on the table that could support an industry like that. And hospitals have aggressively lobbied to make their case.

Medicaid is about much more than health care for the poor, as important as that is. It is also about supporting a large portion of the entire health care system. Without it, many hospitals in poorer neighborhoods would find it impossible to survive. That’s enough to make most politicians pay attention.

According to the nonprofit Urban Institute, Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion will send almost a trillion dollars to the states over the next 10 years. What fiscally responsible politician would want their state to be left out of that? 

Despite the recent defections, most Republican governors remain opposed to expanding Medicare. (Click here to see where each state stands.) They have made their ideological position clear as they create yet another roadblock to Obamacare. But their states may pay a steep price for their decisions. They will pay it not just in the wellbeing of their poorest citizens but also in the vigor of their health care industries and even of their overall economies.

By Robert I. Field

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Latest Health Videos
Also on
letter icon Newsletter