Health and Human Service Secretary Kathleen Sebelius chaired a panel discussion Thursday afternoon at the African American Museum and the focus was the difficulty some women, especially African American women, have in accessing affordable health insurance.
Several told of the struggle they endured and then Dolores McCabe, the retired pastor at Millcreek Baptist Church, asked Sebelius what she and administration could do about the high price of medicine.
McCabe, who uses an asthma inhaler, noted that she was old enough to remember the price controls imposed by President Nixon.
“There has got to be something we can do above the Affordable Care Act that does something about an industry that is immoral,” she said, drawing applause from the crowd. “It is immoral and unethical to charge people to stay alive.”
As head of HHS, Sebelius oversees the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Medicare and Medicaid. She urged the women to call their Congressional representatives and demand such action.
Referring to the now nearly two-year-old health-care law, Sebelius said, “We didn’t get as far as you are suggesting in terms of price controls, but we came some of that distance. It is illegal for us who run Medicare to negotiate for prices. As a former governor, I could negotiate for Medicaid prices and Medicaid drug prices are significantly lower than Medicare drug prices. But that is a change that has to be passed by Congress.”
Sebelius noted the donut hole problem in Medicare drug plans and that the administration's plan closed that by 50 percent right away and will change further. The other fiscal problem with the Medicare Part D drug plan is that there was no funding mechanism created when the law was passed during George W. Bush's administration.
"We're going to continue to work on drug prices," Sebelius said. "This is not over."
As you can imagine, the pharmaceutical industry has fought to keep the restrictions on negotiating drug prices for Medicare and doesn't think it gets enough for some drugs.
An industry trade association, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), was not happy with the proposed budget cuts that reduce what drug companies get in reimbursements from the program.
“Despite President Obama’s many pronouncements to support innovation, advance biomedical research, promote job creation and control health care costs for seniors, his 2013 budget proposal flies in the face of these important goals," PhRMA President and CEO John Castellani said in a statement released Monday after the budget announcement.
“Specifically, proposed mandatory rebates in Medicare Part D are a short-sighted proposition that could destabilize the program and threaten hundreds of thousands of American jobs.
“Recent research from the Battelle Technology Partnership Practice shows that staggering potential job losses would result from undermining the business foundations of biopharmaceutical companies. The report estimates that a $20 billion per year reduction in biopharmaceutical sector revenue would result in 260,000 job losses across the U.S. economy. Government estimates show the Administration’s proposals would have an impact of about this magnitude.
“Medicare Part D is working well for seniors. Due to competition, costs continue to be far below initial projections. We should not disrupt this successful program."
Sebelius oversees the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Is this the same department tracking down interstate raw milk? What a joke. They dont care if drug prices are high. Thats what they want. If not, why did Obama and the FDA make a back room deal after he was elected to disallow the importation of cheaper medicines from Canada. They truely do not care for the sick, just the profit.
OhOkay
Ok, first of all, what the hell is wrong with our country? Do you know that in Europe, if you go to the hospital, they reimbursed you for transportation (both how you got to the hospital- car, bus, subway, et cetera and then how you will be transported home from the hospital). Anyway, drugs prices are way too high. Some doctors refuse to do prescriptions for 90 days because of potential "abuse," but for most people with insurance, the 90 day prescription is much cheaper. Each month, my one medication costs around $1500, insurance covers most of it, but it is still $150, and I still have other prescription medications to BUY! Back to Europe, the most people pay for their prescription drugs is no more than 6 EURO. WTF! I would be a borderline millionaire after years of paying close to $500 a month for all of my medications.
Now, let me attack the big drug company CEOS: you're dead meat. There are children dying of cancer, that can't afford these extreme, costly procedures and the medication that come along with the disease. I don't know how these CEOS can sleep at night. We need to get rid of them and let Health Care be equal for all U.S. citizens. No Money= Dying. Money= whatever you want, to an extent, And some money= better choose what medications you need the most, or you're screwed. I HOPE YOU CEOS GET A BIG BONUS AND DONATE IT TO CHARITIES, ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE UNWORTHY MONEY YOU DON'T DESERVE. THANKS FOR MAKING MY MOMS CANCER GET COSTLY! jerks. Ali Lennox
Hey Ali I support what you says all these Ceos are interested in is lining there pockets with big bonuses and they don't care about anyones health and if they can afford the medication. Carlos C-Los Gordon
some drug prices are too low. specifically off patent drugs and vaccines often have ridiculously low reimbursement rates by government plans. the difference must be made up by private insurers and private care. its a back door tax to help govt plans look cheaper. otoh overly generous patent laws often lead to ridiculous prices for anyone not covered. prices are necessary sp thay people dont consume too much of a thing. the healthcare sys is rife with perverse incentives dreinterests
I attended her townhall meeting at the Constitution Center a few years ago during the healthcare debate. Do not believe anything she said. Lie after lie after lie. Sad.
www.mymedicareadvisor.com www.mymedicareadvisor.com
- Pharmalot
- The Placebo Effect
- New York Times/Prescriptions
- Wall Street Journal/Health blog
- Financial Times
- Cafe Pharma
- Pharma Marketing
- Bio Century
- Bio Space
- Pharma Live
- Monday Morning
- In The Pipeline
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Food and Drug Administration
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
- Office of Inspector General, Health and Human Services
- OIG Most-wanted list of fugitives
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Securities and Exchange Commission/Edgar filings
- U.S. Attorney's Office/Eastern Pennsylvania, health-care fraud
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
- BIO
- Pennsylvania Association of Medical Suppliers
- Jersey Association of Medical Equipment Services
- Science Center
- American Health Lawyers Association
- Drug and Device Law
- Orange Book blog
- Taxpayers Against Fraud
- Adolor
- Almac
- AmerisourceBergen
- AstraZeneca
- Auxilium
- Bayer
- Celgene
- Cephalon
- Endo
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Johnson & Johnson
- Kensey Nash
- Lannett
- Merck
- Pfizer
- Roche
- Sanofi-aventis
- Shire
- Stryker
- Synthes
- Teva
- ViroPharma
- West








David Sell covers the pharmaceutical industry and related topics for The Inquirer’s Business Department. David has been a reporter and editor for more than 20 years. Contact him with tips and suggestions about news from the drug industry and the people who define an industry that touches nearly everyone and employs tens of thousands in the Philadelphia area.
Like David Sell and PhillyPharma