Last year, Barbara’s husband thought it would be fun to learn more about their family’s history, so he bought 23andMe gene-testing kits for himself, Barbara, and their three daughters for Christmas.
Barbara was curious about which countries her relatives had come from, so she loved the idea. She thought she had little to worry about when the company sent her a bonus in the spring: a health-risk report.
Boy, was she wrong.
Once she understood it, she realized the information in that report was devastating. She has a much higher risk than most people of developing Alzheimer’s disease, a deadly form of dementia with no cure and no good treatment. That’s bad news for the whole family. Her husband, who does not have the bad mutation, may have to take care of her. Her daughters will have lower risk than she does because of her husband’s genes, but they have inherited one copy of a gene that raises their risk too.
While she is now “at peace” with the results, Barbara says she probably would not look at them if she had the choice today. “I wish I had known the can of worms I was opening,” she said. A 67-year-old resident of a Philadelphia suburb, she asked that her name be withheld because of the “stigma” of Alzheimer’s. “I’m just not ready,” she said.
23andMe launched its “personal genome service,” which included health-risk data, in 2007. It stopped revealing health risks under orders from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2013, because it had not received proper authorization.
For several years, customers got ancestry information plus reports about relatively benign genetic traits such as whether they have dry or wet earwax. The company returned to telling people whether they were carriers for diseases like sickle-cell anemia in 2015. But earlier this year, the FDA allowed 23andMe, which now has more than three million customers, to release information about genes that increase their personal risk for 10 diseases, including two particularly scary ones: Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.
New customers can choose whether they want only the ancestry reports or are willing to pay more ($199) for ancestry and health-risk reports. Customers who bought the service in previous years can now opt to see reports that weren’t part of the package when they signed up.
Even new customers who purchase the health reports may be blindsided by unexpected information, experts said. They might, for example, be worried about their family history of the eye disease macular degeneration — there’s a report on that too — only to find out they’re at high risk for something more serious that wasn’t on their radar. And particularly savvy consumers can download their raw data and plug it into websites that will tell them more than 23andMe does, another potential source of angst.
On the plus side, the information has the potential to fuel participation in clinical trials that scientists hope will lead to discoveries that will prevent or treat Alzheimer’s and other diseases. More than 85 percent of 23andMe customers say they would like to be part of research. The company makes its trove of de-identified data available to academic and drug-company investigators, often for a fee, and it sometimes notifies customers about trials they can join, including two that are seeking people with the gene variant Barbara has, APOE4. The news also gives people time to make lifestyle changes that may lower their risk. Plus, many people really want this information.
Joyce Tung, vice president of research for 23andMe, said the company’s information not only satisfies customers’ curiosity but has the potential to help “prevent, understand and treat disease.”
But many physicians think it would be better for people to get bad genetic news from an expert who can answer their questions immediately. Some are concerned that ill-prepared customers may wish that they had left Pandora’s box alone. Every time Barbara forgets why she walked into a room — a common experience for people her age — she wonders: “Oh my gosh, is this it? Is it Alzheimer’s?”
Consumers may also have to consider new ethical dilemmas. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 protects people with high-risk genes from discrimination on the job or when buying health insurance, but it does not apply to life, disability, or long-term care insurance. Companies like 23andMe say their information is secure and well-protected from hackers, but customers may face a quandary if an insurer asks about risk.
‘People think of it as the Alzheimer’s test’
Everyone has two copies of the APOE (Apolipoprotein E) gene, which is involved in the transport of fats. It comes in three varieties. APOE2, the rarest, protects against Alzheimer’s. Most people have APOE3, which does not affect Alzheimer’s risk. But APOE4 is the most common genetic factor associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Not everyone who has it gets Alzheimer’s and not everyone who has Alzheimer’s has this gene. However, 23andMe tells customers that 40 to 60 percent of people with Alzheimer’s have one or two copies of APOE4. Doctors say that patients with two copies tend to get the disease earlier than others and their lifetime risk is much higher. About a quarter of the population has at least one copy of the APOE4 type, with 2 to 3 percent having two.
According to 23andMe’s disclosure information, a woman’s chance of having Alzheimer’s at age 85 is 6 to 10 percent if she has no APOE4 variant, 27 to 30 percent if she has one, and 60 percent if she has two. The risk is lower for men: 5 to 8 percent with normal genes, 20 to 23 percent with one copy of APOE4, and 51 percent with two copies.
Three area doctors who specialize in treating dementia — Jason Karlawish, codirector of the Penn Memory Center; Carol Lippa, director of the Cognitive Disorders & Comprehensive Alzheimer’s Disease Center at Jefferson University Hospitals; and David Weisman, a neurologist who does research at Abington Neurological Associates — said small numbers of patients have come to them because they were concerned and confused about 23andMe test results. The company asks customers to read information about Alzheimer’s genes before they click on their results, but the doctors said some patients still misunderstand whether the results mean they have Alzheimer’s or might get it.
“People think of it as the Alzheimer’s test, and I think it’s misleading if they don’t read the small print,” Lippa said. One of Weisman’s patients, who did not have Alzheimer’s but tested positive for APOE4, was already taking Aricept, a dementia drug, when she came to him. (A doctor who specializes in Parkinson’s patients at Penn said she has not seen patients who learned they have the much rarer Parkinson’s-risk genes.)
Weisman, who knows of two patients who killed themselves after getting an Alzheimer’s diagnosis, was so concerned about 23andMe’s decision to release information about APOE4 that he wrote to the FDA to urge it to change its “terrible decision.”
“This is a travesty,” he said in an interview. “The FDA has allowed this private company to release information and potentially drop bombshells into a family with really no control … or professionalism.”
Jessica Langbaum, principal scientist for the Banner Alzheimer’s Institute in Phoenix, said researchers are still in the early days of understanding the psychological impact of learning one has APOE4 genes. She thinks there’s less room for misunderstanding when patients get the bad news in person. “I still believe that learning your APOE tests results should be done in conversation with a medical health provider, like a genetic counselor,” she said.
That’s what happens with the Generation Program, two studies Banner is overseeing that are recruiting people with APOE4 genes for clinical trials. Three local sites, including Penn and Weisman’s practice, are participating.
Langbaum had hoped that the new 23andMe testing would at least lead a lot more people to join the trials. That hasn’t happened.
Studies show most people handle bad news well
Robert Green, a geneticist at Harvard Medical School, and J. Scott Roberts, director of the Genomics, Health & Society Program at the University of Michigan School of Public Health, have been studying the impact of learning about Alzheimer’s risk for several years. They analyzed a variety of ways of delivering the news in person. Mostly, they said, people have handled bad news better than many doctors feared. Distress has been brief.
Roberts and Green surveyed 1,648 23andMe customers about genetic results they got before 2013, a group that received both good and bad news. Two percent regretted getting the report and 1 percent said they suffered harm. A red flag, Roberts said, was that 38 percent hadn’t considered the possibility that they could receive “unwanted” news. Thirteen percent of the group chose not to look at APOE results.
Later the researchers analyzed responses from just the people who learned they had one copy of APOE4 (23 percent) or two (2 percent). They were only slightly more distressed than the group as a whole.
Green said increasingly easy access to genetic information will force people to grapple with what they want to know, in much the way that they can now decide, say, whether they want to watch sexually explicit entertainment. “An awareness of what you might find and whether you want it or not has got to creep out into all of society,” he said.
‘It was scary’
There are, of course, people who want the whole truth. A 77-year-old Philadelphia man, who didn’t want his name used, found out he has two APOE4 genes through 23andMe and went to Jefferson for testing. So far, his results are good. His mother died of Alzheimer’s and his older sister is in the end stages now. He didn’t care about his ancestry. He took the 23andMe test because he wanted to know about Alzheimer’s. “To me, knowledge is power,” he said. “If somebody tells me that, in a year, my mind’s going to be wiped out, at least I can have a pretty good year.”
Julie Gregory signed up for 23andMe in its early days hoping for information about an immunological syndrome but was instead “devastated” to learn that she is APOE4-positive. She is now grateful for the information and is trying to prevent dementia with a healthy lifestyle and anti-inflammatory diet. She started ApoE4.info, an online support group for people who have the APOE4 variant. It has 2,000 members, most of whom are 23andMe customers, she said, and is growing “by leaps and bounds” this year.
“We know the medical community has nothing to offer us,” Gregory, 55, of Long Beach, Ind., said. “We’ve sort of taken our cognitive future into our own hands.”
The group has a Thinking About Testing page. “We wanted people to be aware this is a big decision,” Gregory said. “Don’t just blindly click buttons like I did.”
Amanda Morris, a 33-year-old Herndon, Va., woman, started her genetic journey because of her father’s curiosity about his background. A 23andMe test confirmed their surprising Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.
Then she discovered she could download her raw genetic data on 650,000 gene variants, an option some consumers use to find information that 23andMe does not analyze and does not vouch for. Morris had the raw data analyzed at another site. The results returned with a pink warning box. She had the BRCA1 mutation, which greatly increases the risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
“I am in the knowledge-is-power camp, but it was scary to get that information on a computer screen,” Morris said. She talked to doctors and had more testing with the same result. Because she faced a 60 to 85 percent risk of breast cancer and 40 to 65 percent risk of ovarian cancer, she had a double mastectomy and had her ovaries and fallopian tubes removed. Better to have looked at that data, she said, than to find out that she had BRCA1 after she was diagnosed with breast cancer.
Brianne Kirkpatrick, a genetic counselor who lives near Charlottesville, Va., started her business two years ago when she saw a burgeoning demand for counseling from people who’d gotten frightening genetic information, mostly after analysis of raw data that might not be accurate. “It’s really like the wild, wild west of genetics,” she said.
Kirkpatrick has taken all the tests herself to understand what clients are going through. There have been no land mines so far, but she hasn’t looked at her whole genome. “All of us have things lurking,” she said. “It’s whether we know about them or not.”