Saturday, April 6, 2013
Saturday, April 6, 2013
@

Terri Schiavo's brother working to help others

Story Highlights
  • Bobby Schindler believes his sister, Terri Schiavo, deserved to live.
  • Schindler now heads a growing foundation to help others in similar situations.
  • Schiavo died in 2005 after 15 years in what doctors termed a persistent vegetative state.
Gallery: Terri Schiavo's brother working to help others

By now, eight years later, after so much debate over his sister's situation - her diagnosis, her prognosis, her wishes, her autopsy - one thought remains dominant for Bobby Schindler: Terri Schiavo deserved to live.

Schindler now heads a growing foundation to help others in similar situations. Every year since her death, they've held a "Terri's Day" of remembrance.

This year, the Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network has moved from Florida to the Philadelphia area, where both the Schindler and Schiavo families are from, and the event has grown.

At 5 p.m. Friday, Archbishop Charles J. Chaput will celebrate a Mass dedicated to Terri Schiavo at the Cathedral Basilica of SS. Peter and Paul. Sarah Palin will speak afterward at a fund-raising dinner at the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown. A ticket is $150, and 350 have been sold; $25,000 gets you a visit with Palin, but no takers so far, Schindler said.

Terri Schiavo died March 31, 2005, after 15 years in what doctors termed a persistent vegetative state. Her case was marked by an excruciating public family battle that traversed the courts, prompted an unprecedented session of Congress, drew the attention of the Vatican, and inspired countless Americans to complete "living wills" spelling out what care they did - or did not - want in the event of severe injury or illness.

Her husband, Michael, said she would not have wanted to live this way. Her parents and siblings said she would have chosen life, no matter what.

It is a decision that daily is facing many families, although rarely in such a public arena. Mostly, it's in a hospital conference room with a box of tissues on the table.

 

'Strong obligation'

Most people - 85 percent to 90 percent - say they would not want to be kept alive in a persistent vegetative state. But when they're deciding for another family member, it's a different story.

"Many families feel a strong obligation to keep a family member alive," said John HansenFlaschen, head of pulmonary and critical care at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.

From the Health Desk
Stay Connected

Often, the simple act of a finger that moves or an eyelid that flutters gives them hope, however faint.

But fiscal concerns are real. "If you ask the question, 'Do you want your money to go to this?' most people say no," HansenFlaschen said. "But if you ask the question about individual rights, people say yes."

He thinks most people don't have a problem with a family caring for a patient in a persistent vegetative state at home. But if the patient is in an acute-care hospital like HUP, where the beds are always full, that amounts to a person who likely will not get better blocking access for a person who likely will.

In the extreme cases where the family wants a persistently vegetative patient who is dying revived, Hansen-Flaschen dislikes the often-invasive measures necessary - "poking holes in people, breaking ribs, causing bruises. It feels very unnatural and wrong to be doing violence to such a person."

Meanwhile, in the nearly 25 years since Terri Schiavo first collapsed, this area of medicine has "changed dramatically," said John Whyte, director of the Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute.

Recovery of consciousness is happening more often than long believed. "There is significant long-term disability," Whyte said. "But in general, the prognosis is more positive than many people thought."

New treatments also are showing promise. Zolpidem, a sleep drug, has helped some in vegetative states regain consciousness, if only for hours. It's no magic bullet, Whyte said. "But it shows us that not everyone who is vegetative," even for a long time, "is irreversibly vegetative."

Schindler, 48, a former math and science teacher in Florida, thinks many patients are being warehoused. Last year, the foundation established a Center for Disability in the Public Square - a data-gathering and information-sharing network. In his office, he has a sketch of a rehab facility he would like the foundation to build, although he concedes it is likely a long way off.

The foundation, begun in 2000, has seen its revenue grow steadily, from less than $20,000 in 2005 to nearly $700,000 in 2011.

That year, contributions were bolstered by a $100,000 prize from the Gerard Health Foundation, a pro-life philanthropy in Natick, Mass., that praised the Schiavo network for helping 1,000 families, and giving them "safe haven amidst the pressure of the so-called 'right to die' movement."

One of them is Sara Harvey, of Horseheads, N.Y., just north of the Pennsylvania line. She has been battling officials over her husband, Gary, who has been in a persistent vegetative state for nearly seven years, after falling down steps and suffering a traumatic brain injury.

A judge had named the county Gary Harvey's guardian in 2007, and in 2009, officials planned to remove his feeding tube. Sara Harvey contacted Schindler, who has petitioned the court to name him a legal guardian.

No decision has been made, but Sara Harvey credits Schindler with saving her husband's life so far. "Bobby's like an angel over my husband."

Schindler said the foundation often can steer people to legal help and other resources. But "sometimes it doesn't work out."

"People call us, and they think that all we have to do is pick up the phone and stop something," he said. "I have to remind people, we lost. We weren't able to defend Terri."

An analysis by the nonprofit clearinghouse GuideStar shows that in 2010, the network dedicated only 40 percent of its spending to program services. Nearly half of expenditures went just to fund-raising, a percentage that dismays Schindler.

 

'Always a struggle'

"I wish there was more to show for it," Schindler said. "Fund-raising is always a struggle, because of the apathy out there. . . . I hate the amount of time I spend to raise funds."

In 2011, the foundation spent nearly $46,000 on travel. Schindler said he often attended 20-plus events a year.

Documents for 2011 list three key employees and their pay: Schindler got $47,062; his mother, Mary, the office administrator, $23,250; and sister, Suzanne Vitadamo, the treasurer, $39,042.

Terri's father, Robert, died in 2009 - brokenhearted that he was unable to save his daughter, Bobby Schindler said.

Schindler believes that questions about the value and quality of a life will only grow, given medicine's increasing ability to keep people alive, despite serious injury.

When the autopsy came out, showing the extent of her injury, he thought people used it as a justification for her death.

"To justify ending the lives of these individuals, we focus on the extent of the injury," he said. "Where in that continuum of brain injury does it become OK to kill them?"

He thinks people like his sister are "blessings." How we care for them "is a way of testing us, a reflection of our culture."

 


Contact Sandy Bauers

at 215-854-5147 or sbauers@phillynews.com, or

follow on Twitter @sbauers.

Read her blog, "GreenSpace,"

at www.philly.com/greenspace.

 

 

Sandy Bauers Inquirer Staff Writer
email
You May Also Like
Comments  (25)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:19 AM, 04/04/2013
    Boy, Philly.com and the left love to dance on other people's despair.

    What's next? Trolling out the families of Sandy Hook?
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:56 AM, 04/04/2013
    Please. You're the biggest troll on these boards, spewing your hateful rhetoric on a daily basis. If you despise Philly.com so much do yourself and everyone else here a huge favor and sod off.
    Jabey
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:53 AM, 04/04/2013
    Oh...and you just cant look away can you.

    Fly in the liberal rhetoric ointment!
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:34 AM, 04/04/2013
    Her husband did the right thing. The family's behavior is appalling, and the inclusion of the Palintwit should certainly underscore it(I am MORE than sure she will tie this to Obama "death panels"). I can't believe they are still milking Terry's death for their own benefit. Fifteen years they forced that woman to suffer! Disgraceful.
    A836
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:28 PM, 04/04/2013
    Agreed, and I find it amusing that the "sanctity of marriage" crowd seems to flock to this case. If marriage really were sacred to these creeps, then why did they do everything they could to interfere with the wishes of those actually in the marriage. Mr Schiavo was making a medical decision on behalf of his spouse. I guess marriage is only sacred to these clods if it's the kind of marriage that they approve of.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:56 AM, 04/04/2013
    There is a reason why the details of his sister's condition are not important to Bobby Schindler: the details of her tragic condition meant that she had no chance of any cognitive existence at all. Ironically, her situation set off a spate of people signing living wills stating that in no event would they want to be kept breathing if they were in Terri Schiavo's condition. It is of course tragic that she went into a persistent vegetative state; she is a tragic figure for that reason alone. She is also a tragic figure, however, not because her treatment was terminated, but because it was not ended sooner. If you would not yourself want to end up spending decades in a coma, how can you wish that fate on someone else?
    BarbaraM
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:36 PM, 04/04/2013
    Her "cognitive existence" doesn't MATTER, Barbara: that's what you people keep missing. You act as though her condition proves that doctors did the right thing, but they don't. A person is still a human being even if she's no longer coherent. Even if she's no longer perfect. It's her call, not yours. And we have no substantive proof that she would have wanted to die.
    bmmg39
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:11 AM, 04/04/2013
    As a father I can't imagine what it would be like to have a man, decide to starve my daughter to death with the force of the state behind him. A father's first duty is to protect his children, particularly his daughter. I have married daughters - all my son in laws know what would happen to them should they kill my daughter. As for all the propaganda about her brains being 'mush', I saw the video of her. She was not in a 'vegetative state' as reported. If she were, that would be different. It may even be different if the father and family were not willing to take care of her. But they were; The husband was free to marry his girlfriend.
    joelombardo
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:50 AM, 04/04/2013
    First of all, he didn't "kill" his wife. Second, what would you do tough guy? So you're making threats against your son-in-laws for no reason? Seek some mental help.
    john_dallas_bowers
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:37 PM, 04/04/2013
    You're right, Joe. People say she was "brain dead," but she was never that (until she was dehyrdrated to death, that is). Brain-damaged, yes, but that's a different classification with different criteria.
    bmmg39
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:47 AM, 04/04/2013
    Well joelombardo, the point you're missing here is that it was her husband's decision. He was married to her. What part of that don't you get? Her father had no legal rights, she was a grown adult married to another grown adult. You must also be a Santorum supporter, the nutjobs like to stay together (ie. Professor nitwit 1982).
    john_dallas_bowers
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:55 AM, 04/04/2013
    Hey knuckles Bowers - I supported the court's decision.

    Bush and the social conservatives were wrong here.

    Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

    BTW, Santorum is a joke.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:39 PM, 04/04/2013
    Did you know that disability-rights groups and Rev. Jesse Jackson also fought against Michael Schiavo's "right" to have his wife killed? Is that fact inconvenient for you?
    bmmg39
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:49 AM, 04/04/2013
    joelombardo - and you are of course in a position within the medical profession to determine whether she was or wasn't in a 'vegetative state'? Ok....
    hvitoloco
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:19 AM, 04/04/2013
    Until it is a person in your own family that is considered to be in a nonrevokable vegetative state or someone who has to make a painful decision, none of us really knows for certain how we would react or what our decision would be. I looked at that picture of Terri as she was in the end and I see the beautiful picture of her in today's article, gutwrenching and heartbreaking. I for one will not offer an opinion of what is or was the right thing concerning this or any such matter, when I think about it, if it were one of my own, I just don't know how I would feel. However, as for me personally, I hope that if I am in such a state that my family lets me pass on, I do not consider them to be killing me but granting me death with dignity. Is there any chance of a meaningful recovery from such a state, is there any chance of me winning one of those large lotteries, yes but look at the odds.
    mother3


View comments: 1  |  2