Comments (38)
Just another anti-NRA piece. We pays tons and tons of money to protect our politicians, current and former, heads of large corps, celebs but the Dems don't think that our children are worth the price. Bloomberg walks around with 6 taxpayer funded bodyguards but he won't allow us to protect the kids. Obama and Rham Emanuel both send their kids to school with armed security, but you're NOT ALLOWED to do the same. Go figure.— Taxpaying Voter- This comment has been deleted.— Cheese Steak Charlie
Brilliant, just absolutely brilliant answer by the NRA.
the NRA has it exactly right. More guns are always the answer.
guns a schools
guns at church
guns at the movie theaters
guns at the supermarket
guns at day care
guns at Wa Wa
guns at the gas station
Guns at playgrounds
Guns everywhere
guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns
More, faster more powerful guns with huge magazines solves all our problems.
After all we want our children to be safe everywhere. Not just schools.— GOPee_er- LoL - GOPee_er doesn't already realize the illegal guns and police officers with guns are already in ALL these places.
Sadly, because of liberal policy, there was no legal gun at Sandy Hook when one was really needed.
I guess next GOPee_er would say we should not be concerned about North Korea and we dont need a military.— Professor1982 - This comment has been deleted. — Cheese Steak Charlie
- The fact that you think you're an intelligent person is the best part of your post.
About 90% of the public wants some kind of background checks. Which should bother you a little, because if they ever start that, you'll never be able to buy a gun again.— carl and sons - This comment has been deleted. — Cheese Steak Charlie
- "Also, I've never...had any mental problems"
LOL.
— carl and sons - Agreed. Funny how the liberal media dances on the graves of 26 dead people (who were in a "Gun Free" School Zone mind you) and now scoff at the ONLY solution that would have stopped Lanza.
Pathetic. Americans want easy answers to difficult decisions how weak it has become.— Professor1982 - Funny how liberals who spend money like it's going out of style are suddenly worried about the cost of something (when it's something they oppose), LOL!— Strongbow
- From Havard's Study on Gun Control -
"Nations with stringent anti-gun laws generally have substantially higher murder rates than those that do not. The study found that the nine European nations with the lowest rates of gun ownership (5,000 or fewer guns per 100,000 population) have a combined murder rate three times higher than that of the nine nations with the highest rates of gun ownership (at least 15,000 guns per 100,000 population)."
http://theacru.org/acru/harvard_study_gun_control_is_counterproductive/— Professor1982 - If you want a committee to study the quality of education, make it of educators. If you want a committee to study the quality of security in schools, make it of security experts. Just as the security experts know little about teaching, teachers know little about security. This doesn'r seem to make sense to Mr Johnson. I imagine that the next time he meeds a medical opinion, he will go to an orderly at the hospital and ask him. After all, orderlies spend more time in hospitals than doctors do. Right?— DonQ
- I agree with taxpaying voter. Obviously every school child in the country should have their own personal bodyguard who will accompany them during the school day.— pic man
- You have to click on the link at the end to read the full story. The price is $16.3 billion. Why doesn't the article here quote that cost?— phillyboy1961
- I personally can't think of one teacher in my high school who I'd want to be in charge of a gun. Seriously, even with training.— timprov
Classifieds:
Site Services:
Partners: