PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
options
 
Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Got this thoughtful letter from King of Prussia reader Ed Campbell, whose child attends a Philadelphia Archdiocesan elementary school. He wrote in response to my column today about the archdiocese' limiting the school-selection choices of families affected by the school closings and mergers slated for June.

Campbell's letter is on the long side, but he makes such compelling points I don't want to edit it. 

Here it is:

"I am a parent of a child who attends Mother of Divine Providence Catholic School in King of Prussia.   Our school has been 'saved”' from outright closure, but is scheduled to reopen next year under a new name and merged with students and families from Conshohocken Catholic.   Because we have been 'saved' I am supposed to be relieved.  The reality is that I struggle to make sense of the Blue Ribbon Commission’s proposal for Catholic elementary schools.  I am not alone.

"Looking closely at the Blue Ribbon Commission’s report, there is a consistent theme among the schools affected.  With few exceptions the schools affected are at or below 50% of their capacity, and on average, require substantial subsidies from their parish.  Looking at that broad picture, the decision to merge and consolidate schools is compelling and inescapable.  However the same cannot be said about which schools are actually merged together.  Those decisions, to many parents, are outright baffling. 

"There is an existing model for regional education that the Blue Ribbon Commission appears to have ignored completely, and that is our regional public school system.   Merging Catholic elementary schools in a way that roughly mirrors the geographic boundaries of our public school systems would provide efficiencies in busing, curriculum and scheduling.  More importantly, our public-school districts give shape to what many of us consider to be our broader communities.  To many families who will be displaced, moving to a school that is in close proximity and/or within the boundaries of their current school system would provide a sense that they are attending a school within their community.  Reordering our Catholic Schools along the geographical lines of our public school systems would also be consistent with the concept of 'school choice.'  If you elect not to send your child to your local public school, there would be a logical alternative located within your own public-school district. Keeping children in Catholic schools located within existing public- school district boundaries seems like a natural fit. 

"So why was that model ignored?  WEell, the Archdiocese of Philadelphia organizes itself into four administrative Regions (Episcopal Regions).  Each region is assigned an Auxiliary Bishop. Each Region is subdivided into multiple Deaneries.  Each Deanery is subdivided into a handful of Parish Planning Areas (“PPAs”).  Each PPA is comprised of 4-8 parishes.  Who knew?  In a world where Episcopal Regions, Deaneries and PPAs are relevant, the reorganization falls together very nicely…… 

"In that world, it makes sense to merge St. Philip Neri in East Greenville, Montgomery County, with schools in Quakertown, Bucks County, because they are in the same Deanery and PPA.  Or, consider the merger proposed between Conshohocken Catholic (Colonial School District) and Mother of Divine Providence in King of Prussia (Upper Merion School District), approximately 7 miles away.  Many children from Conshohocken are already migrating to Catholic schools in Plymouth and Lafayette Hill that are within the Colonial School District.  So it would seem to make sense to send children from Conshohocken to schools located within the same public-school district’s boundaries and where many are already migrating. 

"But if you live in the world of Deaneries, you don’t see the world that way. If you see the world as a Deanery, it makes much more sense to send children from Conshohocken to King of Prussia because they are in the same Deanery and PPA.  Similarly, no consideration is given to sending children from St. Theresa in Trooper to Mother of Divine Providence in King of Prussia (despite their close proximity) because they are in different Deaneries and PPAs.  

"The problem with all of that is obvious.  Episcopal Regions, Deaneries and PPA are irrelevant to most of us showing up in the pews on Sundays and making the sacrifices to send our children to Catholic Schools.  Those arbitrary divisions and territories do not give shape or meaning to our everyday lives.  Using them as a model to reorganize schools results in many merged schools that simply don’t make sense to us down here at the bottom of the ecclesiastical food-chain. 

"One concrete example of the impact of the Archdiocese’ choice policy:

"Conshohocken Catholic has about 200 kids.  They are supposed to go to Mother of Divine Providene  in King of Prussia. The Blue Ribbon Commissions' projection was that Mother of Divine Providence would get about 150-180 of the 200 kids from Conshohocken Catholic.   But the overwhelming majority of Conshohocken Catholic want to go to St. Philip Neri or Epiphany, which are closer and in same public-school district.   The current estimate is that only 35 from Conshohocken will go to Mother of Diviner Providence.  Many think that is wildly optimistic.  The rest will transfer to the pubil- school system. 

"And what about funding that Catholic Schools recieve?  Most programs are administered by school districts and counties.  To the extent that the new regional schools cross school district lines and/or counties, it makes access to the programs that are available much less efficient.

"The Blue Ribbon Commission sent out a survey early on its process.  The Commission knew that they had to close schools, yet they didn’t ask a very simple and fundamental question:  'If your local Catholic elementary school were to close, where would you most likely send your child to school?'  If that question had been asked, I predict that, overwhelmingly, parents would have expressed a desire to send their children to closer Catholic schools and Catholic schools within the public-school catchment area.  More importantly, the Blue Ribbon Commission would have had an invaluable source of information to guide them as they reorganized and regionalized our Catholic schools.   

"Sadly, the failure to ask that simple question, the failure to take into consideration preferences and tendencies of parents with children in Catholic schools and the failure to look at our public-school system’s geographic boundaries as a model will result in many new merged schools that are simply doomed to fail.  The Commission missed an opportunity to create truly sustainable newly merged Catholic schools. It is as if they are setting merged schools up to fail.

"My prayer is that our new Archbishop will have the courage to pause, step back, and look at the need to close and merge elementary schools without regard to Episcopal Regions and Deaneries and instead, look at what mergers might actually work."

 

 

I             

Posted by Ronnie Polaneczky @ 5:09 PM  Permalink | 16 comments
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:21 PM, 01/31/2012
    This guy sounds like he knows what he is talking about. Hope some decision makers will listen.
    couldabeenakenzo
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:30 PM, 01/31/2012
    Mr. Campbell makes some good points about that specific situation, though I would imagine every merger cannot be based soley on public school boundaries, as he suggests. For example, my children's Catholic elementary school has boundaries in portions of three different public school districts.

    But still Polaneczky's hypercritical (as usual) article is still flawed. School selection is not "limited". In general, a child can go to any Catholic elementary school they want, assuming there is space. But if it is not a school that is subsidized by the family's parish, they pay the out-of-parish tuition rate. But they can still attend the school.
    fafafooey
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:08 PM, 01/31/2012
    You are not entirely correct. For a child to attend a Catholic school outside of their home parish, the parents need to get a release letter from their pastor. Good Luck getting that. No pastor will sign that letter and let money walk to another parish. Catholic elementary school choice has always been limited. Just ask the parents of kids whose schools have been closed. They cannot go anywhere but the assigned school. Pastors run their parish kingdoms and spend as they please. Many a parish has been spent dry by pastors who then are reassigned to another parish to do the same thing.
    herbie
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:07 PM, 01/31/2012
    You are right. Using the public school system boundaries might not work in every situation. But the point is that it doesn't appear that they gave any thought on how to make merge schools and make them sustainable. They used the PPA/Deanery model without regard to what mergers might really work.

    What Poaneczyky is reporting has not been picked up by the media. Prior to the Blue Ribbon Commission's report, you are correct. Students could go to any Catholic school that they wanted, and if not subsidezed, they pay the out of parish rate. Now, after the Blue Ribbon Commission, that is no longer permitted. Schools have been directed to refuse admission to students not within the sending region. They are not even allowed to enroll and pay full out of parish tution. I can't image that the ArdD won't revist this, but for the moment, Polaneczky accurately reports the new ArchD policy.
    ejcjrlaw
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:49 PM, 01/31/2012
    As usual, a bureacracy, with each identity trying to build thier own little kingdom, has failed to do the right thing, the most conveinent, and the one that its constituency would approve....;But alas, the church, any church, the governemnt, be it city, state or federal is run not to support the people it is charged to help, but rather , does things to build and justify its own little kingdom.....and that sadly is what any bureacracy does......and the sheep will follow, and those that can will move to different areas and the system fails.......Thank you church hierarchy, govt bureacracies for failing the people miserably...
    nuggett
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:39 PM, 01/31/2012
    Consider real estate. What can the archdiocese sell and get a lot of money for and that will help understand why some schools are opened and others closed. Money is the first priority, the second priority and as the Irish found out -the investigation of Archbishop McQuaid had "no concern for the welfare of children." And we are talking about the 17,000 orphans who were physically, mentally and sexually abused by nuns, brothers and priests. Philadelphia sounds like a sister city. Christ is a Jew, Mary is a Jew, the Wisemen, Jews - and he's nailed to a cross? - or so I'm told to believe. But, I don't.
    Bob Washick
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:34 PM, 01/31/2012
    Under this new plan parents cannot send their children to any other catholic school. So, if their school is forming a new regional school, then they can only send their child to that new regional school. Other Catholic schools will not be allowed to accept them, therefore their only other option will be public school or charter school.
    erooney6
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:12 PM, 01/31/2012
    In this imperfect world that we live in its hard to get things right all the time in any jurisdiction public or private.The public school systems of Phila. Chester Camden are not what they use to be either or for that matter most other places.The Philadelphia parochial school district is no exception.Somehow tuitions will have to come down.It will take a lot of work but can be done.We all had it pretty good in this country back in the 50s and 60s in every which way. Somehow we have to go back to the future. Easier said then done.We dont even make our own tvs anymore if that tells you anything.
    tastycake
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:26 PM, 01/31/2012
    Catholic schools: Here today, gone tomorrow! A hard to swallow reality!
    slugo
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:21 PM, 01/31/2012
    Very insightful thinking from Mr. Campbell. I hope that someone in the Archdiocese reads it.
    SeaMichelle
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:27 PM, 01/31/2012
    to all those above who say we cannot go to another catholic school, that is infact true however there are many schools that accepted families into the parishes WITHOUT the "release" letter that is needed and in our school alone there are 10 families already registered in schools other that the ones we are assigned to go to. So if nobody is going to adhere to the guidelines set then just let us go to the school of our choice anyway without having to leave our parish that some of us truly want to stay at.
    momincatholicschool
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:19 AM, 02/01/2012
    As a parent of a student who's school is closing (merging) I have already spoken to and registered my child in a catholic school that is NOT one that we were told he MUST attend. The priest was very welcoming to us and he is taking students from 2 different school that were slated to go elsewhere.
    It is sad that our parish only subsidizes $30,000 a yr to our school, but now will have to spend $180,000 to send our 180 student to other schools...wouldn't it make more sense to leave us open and save $150,000 and all the jobs of our teachers and staff???
    faith lost
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:22 AM, 02/01/2012
    Good article. The only problem is aligning with the current public school system is short sighted. What happens when the major consolidation of the public schools happen in the near future? Because of school choice, the education system is moving into along the areas' 5 county lines.
    MGuyW
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:23 AM, 02/01/2012
    The PPAS (formerly called clusters) came about late last year on the AD website, although they weren't explained until the fall in the CS&T. In our area, two schools in one PPA merged with two schools in another PPA - makes no sense. I was told the PPA had nothing to do with the schools, just the parishes....how does that make sense when they are now looking to close parishes. As for the public school boundaries, in Montgomery county, may parishes have boundaries covering more than one township therefore more than one school district. There seems to be no rhyme or reason to this whole thing. As for schools not accepting people, there is a school that became regional 2 years ago who is allowing students from the closing schools to shadow there to see if they want to enroll for the new school year. Whether we like the diocese rule or not this is so unfair. When they went through their merge 2 years ago the neighboring parishes respected the diocese rules and would not accept their students in order to give their new school a fighting chance. In this case, the closing schools are merging with schools approx 2 miles apart so they can't even blame it on the distance.
    cathmom
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:49 PM, 02/01/2012
    I had a public school education in middle of the last century on the South Side of Chicago in a neighborhood where the local parish had no elementary school. The Catholic kids in my school got out of school an hour early on Wednesdays to attend to receive religious instruction. What other than religious training do students receive that they cannot get in a public school? If you are gonna tell me it's discipline, discipline should be taught at home.
    puzzler


View comments: 1  |  2
About Ronnie Polaneczky

When my phone rings here at the Daily News, nine times out of ten the caller begins the conversation with, “Yeah, so what happened was…”.

Because this is Philly, the caller doesn’t say, “My name is Bob” – or Mary – “and I wonder if I could have a moment of your time?” Philadelphians are too direct for that. They just say, “Yeah, so what happened was…”, and then tumble into a tale they think oughta be shared with a wider audience. I love getting these calls (even the ones where it becomes clear, after 30 seconds, where the caller sowed the seeds of his own misery), because they give me chance to connect with fellow citizens in a way that no other job allows. Well, okay, no other job for which I’m remotely qualified.

That’s why my blog is titled “So What Happened Was…”. To me, it’s the quintessentially Philly way of saying, “Once upon a time.” When I hear it, I know a good story is coming. And I can’t wait to see how it turns out.

Ronnie Polaneczky has been an award-winning columnist for The Philadelphia Daily News since 1999, offering a front-steps perspective on every aspect of city life, from the sublime to the stupid. In her past life, she was the editor-in-chief of Atlantic City Magazine, associate editor at Philadelphia Magazine and a fulltime freelancer published in Ladies Home Journal, Good Housekeeping, Redbook, Reader's Digest, Men's Health, MarieClaire and others. She lives with her husband, daughter and various pets in the city's Fairmount section, where she dreams of one day singing The National Anthem at an Eagles game. In addition to her column and blog, you can enjoy Ronnie's musings in podcast form here.


Read more from Ronnie Polaneczky at Earth to Philly, the Daily News blog on anything and everything "Green