Friday, July 3, 2015

Thinking about index funds


DEAR HARRY: My wife recently showed me a short article about a man named Charles Ellis who is supposed to be super-knowledgable about the stock market. He is a strong advocate of index funds. He contends that almost no one has been able to beat the market consistently over an extended period of time. Part of this is that all funds have expenses, but the actively managed funds have higher expenses. If this is true, why are there so many advisory letters that claim that they can select funds that beat the market consistently? They even show you a history of their superior performance. Help!

WHAT HARRY SAYS: I don't know much about Charles Ellis except that he has a solid reputation. He is in good company when he talks favorably about index funds. Perhaps their earliest and most famous advocate is John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard Funds. There is a good case for their philosophy, and both men have written extensively to prove their case. Those advisers who show you past results are selective about the period of time they show you. No one can beat the market all the time. No one - not Warren Buffett, not Peter Lynch. A portfolio of carefully selected no-load index funds is the way to go for most investors.


Email Harry Gross at, or write to him at Daily News, 801 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19107.

Daily News Personal Finance Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
Also on
letter icon Newsletter