Wednesday, February 10, 2016

'Friends With Kids' sounds like 'Friends With Benefits'

About the movie
Friends With Kids
MPAA rating:
for sexual content and language
Running time:
Release date:
Maya Rudolph; Chris O'Dowd; Edward Burns; Megan Fox; Jennifer Westfeldt; Kristen Wiig; Adam Scott; Jon Hamm
Directed by:
Jennifer Westfeldt

"FRIENDS WITH Kids" sounds vaguely like "Friends With Benefits," though in this case nobody confuses children with anything beneficial.

Julie (Jennifer Westfeldt) and Jason (Adam Scott) are platonic BFFs who are quietly appalled by the deterioration that children have wrought among their married friends (Jon Hamm and Kristen Wiig, Maya Rudolph and Chris O'Dowd).

The adults have put on weight, ceased to shave (men and women), they fight each other, they fight their kids, they stay at home, poop with the bathroom door open, and at the end of the day claim, half-heartedly, that it's all worth it.

Julie and Jason are unconvinced, but late-thirties Julie, especially, feels the biological pull to have a child. She has a lousy dating life, dislikes the impersonal idea of in vitro. The only guy she really sees as a suitable father is Jason.

So a pact is struck - she will conceive his child the old-fashioned way, they will share custody, and go merrily on their single, separate ways.

It's all meant to be a cutting- edge examination of changing times, non-traditional breeding/parenting, but to my eyes there wasn't enough here to distinguish Julie and Jason from their co-habitating friends.

The two live in the same apartment building. They seem like a wealthy (tons of money) married couple with separate bedrooms, or a benignly divorced couple who've organized their lives for the benefit of the baby.

More like the latter, since writer-director Westfeldt's script gives Jason a smokin' girlfriend (Megan Fox, who is very good), and Julie a handsome divorcee (Edward Burns).

"Friends," for a liberal-minded movie, also sticks conservatively and obviously to rom-com formula - you know that Julie and Jason will set their pretty placeholders aside and realize they love each other, etc.

This takes FOREVER. Compensating are the generous supporting laughs provided by half the cast of "Bridesmaids," although after a time you may find yourself wondering why Wiig and Hamm were not given the lead roles.

Daily News Film Critic
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
Latest Videos:
Also on
letter icon Newsletter