Last month, tests by Consumer Reports revealed significant levels of inorganic arsenic - a carcinogen - in about 10 percent of test samples of apple and grape juices commonly given to young children. Today, Dartmouth College researchers are reporting similarly worrisome levels of arsenic in infant formula and cereal bars, as well as energy bars and "energy shots" marketed for adults.
The apparent culprit: organic brown rice syrup, commonly used as a sweetener in place of high-fructose corn syrup. The study's authors stressed that babies "are especially vulnerable to arsenic's toxic effects," and urged them to check formula ingredients.
Citing an article by the Dartmouth researchers published today in the peer-reviewed Environmental Health Perspectives, Consumer Reports says:
• Two of 17 infant formulas tested listed organic brown rice syrup as the primary ingredient. One had a total arsenic concentration that was six times the federal limit of 10 parts per billion (ppb) for total arsenic in bottled or public drinking water. This is particularly worrisome for babies because they are especially vulnerable to arsenic’s toxic effects due to their small size and the corresponding arsenic consumption per pound of body weight.
• Twenty-two of 29 cereal bars or energy bars tested listed at least one of these four rice products—organic brown rice syrup, rice flour, rice grain or rice flakes - among the top five ingredients. The seven other bars were among the lowest in total arsenic, ranging from 8 to 27 ppb, while those containing syrup or other forms of rice ranged from 23 to 128 ppb.
• Tests of high-energy products known as “energy shots” that are used by endurance athletes and others showed that one of the three gel-like blocks contained 84 ppb of total arsenic, while the other two contained 171 ppb.
Previous Dartmouth studies, as well as other research, have suggested "that many people in the U.S. may be exposed to potentially harmful levels of arsenic through consumption of rice," Consumer Reports says. "Rice is among the plants that are unusually efficient at taking up arsenic from the soil, and much of the rice produced in the U.S. is grown on land formerly used to grow cotton, where arsenical pesticides were widely used for many years, just as they were in orchards and vineyards."
In an email this morning, CR quoted advice from Brian Jackson, lead author of the new study and a member of Dartmouth’s Superfund Research Program: “In the absence of regulations for levels of arsenic in food, I would certainly advise parents who are concerned about their children's exposure to arsenic not to feed them formula where brown rice syrup is the main ingredient.” It says Jackson noted "that infant formulas containing added rice starch did not appear to be a concern in terms of elevated arsenic."
CR says organic-farming methods offer no protection if the soil bears natural arsenic or arsenic from earlier contamination. “That's because the rice takes up natural arsenic from the soil and when the rice is used to make brown rice syrup, much of that arsenic ends up there,” Jackson told CR, published by Consumers Union. “We focused on organic brown rice syrup because this seems to be a sweetener of choice for some organic food products.”
The study's authors conclude that “there is an urgent need for regulatory limits on As [arsenic] in food."
If the arsenic is in one ingredient (rice syrup) but then is diluted by the water and other ingredients, the total level of arsenic would be significantly less than the level found in the one ingredient. Be very careful how you read this study. tina848
Whats the big deal? The boxes say 100% "natural ingredients" Arsenic is an element, thats as natural as it gets! Arent health halo buzzwords awesome? storebrandmayonnaise- Storebrand, Did you read the article? Did you do any additional research to bolster your "natural" ingredient comment? If you take the 3 extra minutes to reread the article or follow the link to the dartmouth research or check google or yahoo you will find that the arsenic involved is not naturally occurring but was artificially introduced to the farm land for other crops. And was introduced in levels far in excess of what would occur naturally.
tina848: Perhaps if the amount of contaminated rice syrup were diluted by gallons instead of just a few ounces of other ingredients then your argument would have a little merit but only a little. BUT: reread teh 4th paragraph. "...infant formula ... with six (6) times teh concentration of arsenic...." It is the apple or grape juice box or infant serving of juice that contains the arsenic well in excess of allowed amounts. Rice syrup is considered the source of the poison. Please continue to feed your young ones this contaminated juice, save the gene pool. nebulus - This comment has been deleted.
ekw555 - ekw: gotcha! I missed the humor. Perhaps it's a little too subtle. Given big business' proclivity for mis-labeling and people's willingness to accept the bad labels, well... Anyway thanks for pointing out my own mis-read.
nebulus
Listen the FDA has its hands full with a couple of farmers moving raw milk across state lines. A lil' arsenic never hurt anyone. you have a choice- a carcinogen or ecoli. Good luck. Raw milk people. raw milk. ooooooooooh! OhOkay
ekw, there are the people that don't get the jokes, and the people that don't get the seriousness.
Besides, 90% of the comments on here directly contradict what the poster would have actually read, because everyone is attention starved. So can't really blame anyone for thinking someone couldn't actually comprehend what they were reading.
Aside from all that, let's all put turn on our grown-up apps. I'm sure one of you have to know a baby that's at risk. Now take a deep breath, and care... MFPhils- MFPhils: Thanks
nebulus
Can we please put sopme arsenic in Ben Bernanke's stew? barneygoogle
10% in the Consumer Reports study? From China, no doubt. As for Dartmouth, I'd bet they receive funding from the HFCS agribigz and are loath to put their sponsors in a bad light. FlapEmEagle
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- Read Jeff Gelles' recent columns














