PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com

email
font size
options
 
Thursday, February 16, 2012

Last month, tests by Consumer Reports revealed significant levels of inorganic arsenic - a carcinogen - in about 10 percent of test samples of apple and grape juices commonly given to young children. Today, Dartmouth College researchers are reporting similarly worrisome levels of arsenic in infant formula and cereal bars, as well as energy bars and "energy shots" marketed for adults.

The apparent culprit: organic brown rice syrup, commonly used as a sweetener in place of high-fructose corn syrup. The study's authors stressed that babies "are especially vulnerable to arsenic's toxic effects," and urged them to check formula ingredients.

Citing an article by the Dartmouth researchers published today in the peer-reviewed Environmental Health Perspectives, Consumer Reports says:

• Two of 17 infant formulas tested listed organic brown rice syrup as the primary ingredient. One had a total arsenic concentration that was six times the federal limit of 10 parts per billion (ppb) for total arsenic in bottled or public drinking water. This is particularly worrisome for babies because they are especially vulnerable to arsenic’s toxic effects due to their small size and the corresponding arsenic consumption per pound of body weight.

• Twenty-two of 29 cereal bars or energy bars tested listed at least one of these four rice products—organic brown rice syrup, rice flour, rice grain or rice flakes - among the top five ingredients. The seven other bars were among the lowest in total arsenic, ranging from 8 to 27 ppb, while those containing syrup or other forms of rice ranged from 23 to 128 ppb.

• Tests of high-energy products known as “energy shots” that are used by endurance athletes and others showed that one of the three gel-like blocks contained 84 ppb of total arsenic, while the other two contained 171 ppb.

Previous Dartmouth studies, as well as other research, have suggested "that many people in the U.S. may be exposed to potentially harmful levels of arsenic through consumption of rice," Consumer Reports says. "Rice is among the plants that are unusually efficient at taking up arsenic from the soil, and much of the rice produced in the U.S. is grown on land formerly used to grow cotton, where arsenical pesticides were widely used for many years, just as they were in orchards and vineyards."

In an email this morning, CR quoted advice from Brian Jackson, lead author of the new study and a member of Dartmouth’s Superfund Research Program: “In the absence of regulations for levels of arsenic in food, I would certainly advise parents who are concerned about their children's exposure to arsenic not to feed them formula where brown rice syrup is the main ingredient.” It says Jackson noted "that infant formulas containing added rice starch did not appear to be a concern in terms of elevated arsenic."

CR says organic-farming methods offer no protection if the soil bears natural arsenic or arsenic from earlier contamination.  “That's because the rice takes up natural arsenic from the soil and when the rice is used to make brown rice syrup, much of that arsenic ends up there,” Jackson told CR, published by Consumers Union. “We focused on organic brown rice syrup because this seems to be a sweetener of choice for some organic food products.”

The study's authors conclude that “there is an urgent need for regulatory limits on As [arsenic] in food."

Posted by Jeff Gelles @ 12:55 PM  Permalink | 9 comments
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:46 PM, 02/16/2012
    If the arsenic is in one ingredient (rice syrup) but then is diluted by the water and other ingredients, the total level of arsenic would be significantly less than the level found in the one ingredient. Be very careful how you read this study.
    tina848
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:55 PM, 02/16/2012
    Whats the big deal? The boxes say 100% "natural ingredients" Arsenic is an element, thats as natural as it gets! Arent health halo buzzwords awesome?
    storebrandmayonnaise
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:30 PM, 02/16/2012
    Storebrand, Did you read the article? Did you do any additional research to bolster your "natural" ingredient comment? If you take the 3 extra minutes to reread the article or follow the link to the dartmouth research or check google or yahoo you will find that the arsenic involved is not naturally occurring but was artificially introduced to the farm land for other crops. And was introduced in levels far in excess of what would occur naturally.

    tina848: Perhaps if the amount of contaminated rice syrup were diluted by gallons instead of just a few ounces of other ingredients then your argument would have a little merit but only a little. BUT: reread teh 4th paragraph. "...infant formula ... with six (6) times teh concentration of arsenic...." It is the apple or grape juice box or infant serving of juice that contains the arsenic well in excess of allowed amounts. Rice syrup is considered the source of the poison. Please continue to feed your young ones this contaminated juice, save the gene pool.
    nebulus
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:49 PM, 02/16/2012
    This comment has been deleted.
    ekw555
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:35 PM, 02/16/2012
    ekw: gotcha! I missed the humor. Perhaps it's a little too subtle. Given big business' proclivity for mis-labeling and people's willingness to accept the bad labels, well... Anyway thanks for pointing out my own mis-read.
    nebulus
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:09 PM, 02/16/2012
    Listen the FDA has its hands full with a couple of farmers moving raw milk across state lines. A lil' arsenic never hurt anyone. you have a choice- a carcinogen or ecoli. Good luck. Raw milk people. raw milk. ooooooooooh!
    OhOkay
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:15 PM, 02/16/2012
    ekw, there are the people that don't get the jokes, and the people that don't get the seriousness.

    Besides, 90% of the comments on here directly contradict what the poster would have actually read, because everyone is attention starved. So can't really blame anyone for thinking someone couldn't actually comprehend what they were reading.

    Aside from all that, let's all put turn on our grown-up apps. I'm sure one of you have to know a baby that's at risk. Now take a deep breath, and care...
    MFPhils
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:37 PM, 02/16/2012
    MFPhils: Thanks
    nebulus
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:02 PM, 02/16/2012
    Can we please put sopme arsenic in Ben Bernanke's stew?
    barneygoogle
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:58 PM, 02/16/2012
    10% in the Consumer Reports study? From China, no doubt. As for Dartmouth, I'd bet they receive funding from the HFCS agribigz and are loath to put their sponsors in a bad light.
    FlapEmEagle


10 comments
About Jeff Gelles
Jeff Gelles covers consumer topics and writes the Consumer 11.0 column for The Inquirer. He welcomes comments from readers about their consumer-related concerns -- either through this blog or by telephone or e-mail. Contact him at 215-854-2776 or jgelles@phillynews.com.