Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

  

share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment
RELATED STORIES
 
Jobless rate rises to 10.2 percent in October
 
Despite economy, Penn's endowment stays even
 
Ex-Rohm & Haas executive to head FMC Corp.
 
Price war among Walmart, rivals heating up
 
Obama signs tax, jobless stimulus
 
Markets find a silver lining
 
They knew it was coming, but a fix isn't so predictable
 
Business news in brief
 
Two Michigan men convicted of business fraud
 
Brand-new branding
 
Likely delay on health-care vote
 
Jobless rate rises to 10.2 percent in October
 
One bar pickup you won't regret
 
Tentative agreement reached with Local 234
 
Phila. Port enters fray over dredging


Phila. Port enters legal fray over dredging

The Philadelphia Regional Port Authority, saying it is vital that deepening of the Delaware River proceed, yesterday filed a motion to intervene as a defendant with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in an anti-dredging lawsuit filed by Delaware.

The Pennsylvania authority and local sponsor of the project to deepen the main shipping channel of the river to 45 feet asked the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware to let it join with the Corps as a party in the case.

Delaware sued the Corps on Oct. 30 to block the 102.5-mile deepening, just days after the Corps decided to proceed without a permit from Delaware's Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control.

In its motion, the Philadelphia port authority said it stood to lose $30 million already committed by Pennsylvania.

The Philadelphia port authority also said it should be heard because the river deepening is essential to "continued economic vitality" of the port and its ability to compete with other ports, as well as thousands of jobs that will be "significantly diminished" unless the dredging goes forward.

"It is critical that this regional project not be further delayed while other East Coast ports, like the Port of New York/New Jersey dredge to prepare for larger vessels," authority chairman John H. Estey said in a statement.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Tom Corbett will represent the port authority in the case.

U.S. District Judge Sue L. Robinson set Dec. 5 for oral argument on Delaware's motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the project.

The deepening was authorized by Congress in 1991 but has been delayed by political and environmental concerns.

On Monday, New Jersey filed its own lawsuit in federal court in New Jersey, asserting the Corps was going ahead without proper environmental permits.

Gov. Rendell has said many environmental studies show the deepening will have no adverse impact on the environment. Environmental groups strongly disagree.

The Army Corps has said it would proceed unless barred by litigation.

 


Contact staff writer Linda Loyd

at 215-854-2831 or lloyd@phillynews.com.

Comments   
Posted 12:26 PM, 11/07/2009
spider9
The fact that the port will be harmed economically shouldn't influence the court's decision on whether with or without an environmental permit. I think the port should let the Army Corps handle this. I do think the river should be deepened, but I think the port shouldn't get involved in this particular lawsuit.
Posted 01:52 PM, 11/07/2009
tfarnath
Why must it be a major port like other cities. Keep it smaller, cleaner, be different. Yes some jobs will be lost but that's life. The shipping industry is nasty and we don't need 80% of the junk that comes in anyway. Stop imitating
Posted 02:42 PM, 11/07/2009
seanfromnj
Of course Pennsylvania wants to go forward with the deepening. They stand to reap all the rewards and other river states (NJ and Delaware) will be forced to accept all the poisonous spoils.
Posted 06:11 PM, 11/07/2009
Fernando08
Of course NJ does not want the S Jersey/Philadelphia/Wilmington competing. There is a direct rail link and abandoned coal mine ready to accept the dredge which will be remediated by local toxicologist recognized by the Army Corps. The link will go from Phila to PA coal mines. Of course, the new multi billion dollar tunnel under the Hudson from Manhattan to NJ will not present an environmental hazard where construction has begun and Pres Obama gave $200m this year alone to expedite the project. Think about all of the polluted sediment, heavy metals and other chemical leached off from massive mining equipment not to mention tons of particulate rock dust. Dredge the river.
Posted 06:58 PM, 11/07/2009
Centrist
@tfarnath, it is the only INTERNATIONAL seaport for Pennsylvania. The dredging will benefit New Jersey, Delaware and Pennsylvania. New Jersey doesn't want it because it will affect the Port of New York and Newark. The pols from Jersey never want South Jersey to compete. @seanfromNJ, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania already said they would take all the material.
5 comments
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Real Estate
  • Rentals
 
SEARCH JOBS
Spotlight Deal
Northern Liberties 19123
Spotlight Deal
Rittenhouse Square 19103
SEARCH REAL ESTATE
Spotlight Deal
West Chester 19382
Spotlight Deal
Conshohocken 19428
SEARCH RENTALS
PHILLY.COM INDICES WATCH
Business newsletter
Sign up for a free e-mail business update from the Inquirer straight to your inbox every weekday afternoon.

Investors wondering whether it's time to buy or sell stocks might be better off watching the calendar than anything else the next few weeks.
Money traps are mistakes that catch us off guard. Many of us fall into them because of unrealistic expectations, or failing to make a plan. These sites could open your eyes to common pitfalls.