
options
Once a decade, City Council changes something important. It re-draws the maps that dictate which Councilpeople represent which neighborhoods.
For every Philadelphia citizen, redistricting means one important voice that represents your street could change. But it can be a process that's more about politics than good government. Already this year, City Council has been criticized for not having enough public hearings on the process. (They are now having two.)
But a Philly tech firm believes you need a voice in this process - and that you're smart enough to try drawing your own City Council districts. Azavea has built a web site that allows you to propose which neighborhoods should go in which council districts. It even layers in the best practices around redistricting, helping you to build a Council map that distributes the votes fairly and prevents gerrymandering.
Try it out at www.fixphillydistricts.com, a project that is being supported by Azavea, Philly.com, the Philadelphia Daily News, the Penn Project for Civic Engagement and Newsworks. They are hosting a contest for the best-drawn district.
And if you need a little help getting started, Azavea is hosting a webinar tonight at 6:30 p.m. that explains the software. You can sign up for this free webinar here.
Seems like, even when public hearings are scarce, public involvement can happen - especially when Philly's tech community gets involved. Philly.com is proud to participate in this project, and we hope you will, too. If you are joining in, tell us by tweeting @phillydotcom.
0 like this / 0 don't Posted 9:12 AM, 08/12/2011Since there is effectually only one political party in the city, it doesn't need so many councilpersons and council districts. Nor does it need council-persons-at-large. These folks are nothing more than rubber-stamps for the behind the scenes players who run the city. Get rid of as many as possible. BoruSign in to report abuseSign in to report abuseSelect a username to report abuseConfirm your registration to report abuse
0 like this / 0 don't Posted 7:25 PM, 08/13/2011I would probably support fewer districts and fewer at-large seats, but not doing away with at-large altogether. I would make the at-large seats half majority party, half minority by shrinking the number of majority seats... two and two should suffice. That's all pie-in-the-sky, though. For now I would be satisfied with sane, non-gerrymandered districts. SirEdwardSign in to report abusePost your responseConfirm your registration to report abuse
If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" button.
Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.
Edit your account information
Edit your account information
Please note that your registration will not be considered fully complete until you confirm by following the link we have provided in a confirmation email that was just sent to .
Until you follow the link in that confirmation email, you may log in but will not be able to comment, so make sure to check your inbox for a message from register@philly.com.
- News | Sports | Business | What's Happening | Restaurants & Food | Entertainment | Living | Marketplace | Jobs













