One of better roundups I've read in a long time on how business travelers use high-speed trains in Europe can be found on The Times of London's TimesOnline Web site. Anyone who travels for business or leisure within Europe should find the article helpful in knowing the cities that are now connected, downtown-to-downtown, in less than three or four hours by rail. Just as Amtrak's fairly high-speed trains from Boston to Washington through Philadelphia are competitive with airlines, Europe's system draws travelers away from the skies. And that's despite a plethora of discount airlines and often higher fares on many European rail routes.
As you may know from visting here before, a new administration in Washington has given a boost in its economic stimulus program to development of more high-speed rail lines in this country, as I pointed out in my Feb. 23 Winging It column. Years, probably decades, will pass before we could have a rail network like the one described in the TimesOnline report. We have a tremendous amount of catching up to do, but we can hope, can't we?
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Ok, xi and ark. Keep sucking at the teat of big oil you morons. Dr. Martin von Nostrand
I travel between Philly and NY and Philly and DC weekly. I wouldn't do it if I had to drive. I have a very nice car and love to drive but not in traffic. I rather send emails via my blackberry and use my laptop than share the road with road ragers trying to get into the city. It's probably no coicidence that forward thinking cities NY, Boston, San Fran and Seattle all have great transit systems filled mostly with well paid professionals. phillyylliph
Comment removed.
'Big Oil' isn't the problem, it's the power hungry fascists who want to pick our pockets for these make-work projects. JerryCurlan
I agree, high-speed rail would be "nice to have" but at what cost per mile? Most passenger train lines loose money. Matter of fact, almost every public transit system fixed operating costs cause them to loose money. Without huge...massive, more government stimulus I seriously doubt a high-speed rail system would come close to covering their costs. It would be another drag on taxpayers forced to pay for "good intentions" and failed policies of elected officials. ScottYaw- Requiring public transit to pay for itself is a ridiculous double standard. Without goverment subsidy, any form of transportation would fail. The airlines wouldn't be successful without taxes paying for Air traffic control and airport costs. Public road systems operate with a far greater government subsidy than transit. The vast majority of public roads don't make a dime to pay for themselves, relying entirely on government subsidies. Maybe we should hold Highways to the same ridiculous standard of profitability that so many people want to apply to trains and buses, and see what the toll per mile is. The public would be perfectly fine paying $2/mile to drive to work, because the only thing in this world that matters is profit, right? Pelti
- Philadelphia International Airport
- Air Canada
- Air France
- Air Jamaica
- AirTran Airways
- American Airlines
- British Airways
- Continental Airlines
- Delta Air Lines
- Frontier Airlines
- Midwest Airlines
- Northwest Airlines
- Southwest Airlines
- Spirit Airlines
- United Airlines
- US Airways
- USA 3000 Airlines
- Baggage bungling at PHL
- Local weather updates
- Local traffic updates
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008







