Wednesday, September 2, 2015

The new old rules on airline security

What a time to take off 10 working days, trying to decompress and avoid being in constant contact with my fellow air travelers! There was no escape from the news bombardment we have all experienced over the failed terrorist plot on Christmas Day that could have destroyed a Northwest A330 widebody as it approached Detroit. (One random thought on the "panty bomber" effort: Unless the flight was on a highly unusual path, it happened in Canadian air space. Would that have made a difference? Likely not.)

The new old rules on airline security


What a time to take off 10 working days, trying to decompress and avoid being in constant contact with my fellow air travelers! There was no escape from the news bombardment we have all experienced over the failed terrorist plot on Christmas Day that could have destroyed a Northwest A330 widebody as it approached Detroit. (One random thought on the "panty bomber" effort: Unless the flight was on a highly unusual path, it happened in Canadian air space. Would that have made a difference? Likely not.)

There would be no point to try to catch up now by posting older stories here about the incident. When I see news you can use from this point on, I will give you links. If you're flying this week, you need to know that after a series of fits and starts, the Transportation Security Administration has settled on some new, yet old, rules about getting on an airline flight -- just as we saw just after 9/11.

For domestic flights, little has changed. For international flights, expect much more scrutiny, including more full-body scans where the equipment is in place, or wanding and pat-downs of passengers (not just the 90-year-olds in wheelchairs). Today's biggest news, found here and on every other news outlet on the planet, is about mandatory use of the screening techniques for travelers from countries considered sponsors of terrorism. The TSA Web site ( has little useful information about the additional procedures beyond what has been posted on the site since Dec. 27.

Domestically, for a Dec. 31 flight, I noticed no change in security checkpoint procedures. The only difference was plenty of time for a sit-down lunch after getting to the airport three hours before the scheduled departure, and taking five minutes to clear security.   

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Tom Belden has been reporting about Philadelphia International Airport and other air travel subjects for more than 20 years, writing columns for The Inquirer's Travel and Business sections. His reporting (with colleague Craig McCoy) on baggage handling problems in Philadelphia have been credited with helping to improve the system. His previous blog was called Road Warrior. He can reached at Reach Tom at

Tom Belden
Also on
letter icon Newsletter