Ahhh, what a mess we've created for ourselves when it comes to airport security screening. Our political leaders, responding to anguished cries after 9/11 for aviation security at practically any price, created a massive burearacry -- the Transportation Security Administration -- that did what we asked and devised one new way after another to check for bad things bad people might try to carry on a flight. Now we're paying the price, with the choice a full-body scan that reveals everything under your clothes or an "enhanced patdown," or frisking, that some are calling sexual harrassment by government agents.You will find other posts from the last two weeks on these issues if you scroll down.
Here are today's stories and links to the ongoing media coverage of this brouhaha. First, a link to national opt-out day, an effort that could create terrible airport terminal jams on Wednesday Nov. 24, the day before Thanksgiving when airline passenger counts are at their peak for the year. The leaders of the movement are calling for all travelers to ask to "opt out" of use of the body scanner and ask for the more time-consuming patdown. This movement appears to be somewhat nonpartisan, although much of the noise generated so far seems to have come from ultra-conservatives and / or libertarians.
Warning: The www.optoutday.com site is a volunteer effort. Scroll down to see images of what full-body scanning really means. The post starts with the news that a Senate oversight committee will question TSA officials about its efforts at a hearing tomorrow.
The newspaper columnist who has been writing about this the longest, Joe Sharkey of the The New York Times, reported today on the call he got from the head of the TSA, worried about the additional security concerns raised by big jams at checkpoints. Best of luck if you're flying on Nov. 24.